Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1998 Oct;193(Pt 3):417–430. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19330417.x

Supraspinal connections and termination patterns of the parabrachial complex determined by the biocytin anterograde tract-tracing technique in the rat

ROSSELLA BIANCHI 1 ,✉, GIOVANNI CORSETTI 1 , LUIGI RODELLA 1 , GIOVANNI TREDICI 2 , MAGDA GIOIA 2
PMCID: PMC1467862  PMID: 9877297

Abstract

We have re-evaluated, using the anterograde tracer biocytin, supraspinal efferent projections from the parabrachial complex (PBN) to gain new information about the nature of its connections and nerve terminal patterns. We selectively injected biocytin into the 3 main regions of the nucleus (lateral PBN, medial PBN and Kölliker-Fuse nucleus). We observed distinct groups of ascending and descending fibres of different calibre from the PBN running throughout the brain and reaching many brain areas involved in the regulation of autonomic function. Here we detected labelled bouton-like terminals and fibres with en-passage varicosities. The ascending efferents from the lateral PBN mainly reached the reticular, raphe and thalamic nuclei, the zona incerta (ZI), central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and lateral area of the periaqueductal grey (PAG). Thin descending efferents reached the ventral region of the solitary tract nucleus (STN). The ascending efferents from the medial PBN were seen in the raphe nuclei, reticular nuclei, ventral and lateral areas of the PAG, thalamic nuclei, and in the medial and lateral nuclei of the amygdala. Descending efferents were seen in the STN and in some reticular nuclei. The ascending projections from the Kölliker-Fuse targeted the ventral area of PAG, CeA, ZI, lateral hypothalamic area, ventromedial thalamic nucleus and, with only a few terminals, the ipsi and contralateral reticular area. A large number of descending efferents reached STN, caudal and paragigantocellular reticular nuclei. The higher sensitivity of biocytin compared with other types of markers allowed us to determine more effectively the distribution, nature and extent of the supraspinal PBN connections. This suggested that in several nerve circuits the PBN probably plays a more important role than previously thought.

Keywords: Brainstem, parabrachial efferents, anterograde labelling

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams J. C. Heavy metal intensification of DAB-based HRP reaction product. J Histochem Cytochem. 1981 Jun;29(6):775–775. doi: 10.1177/29.6.7252134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson W. A., Bruni J. E., Kaufmann A. Afferent connections of the rat's supraoptic nucleus. Brain Res Bull. 1990 Feb;24(2):191–200. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(90)90205-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Behbehani M. M. Functional characteristics of the midbrain periaqueductal gray. Prog Neurobiol. 1995 Aug;46(6):575–605. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(95)00009-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beitz A. J. The midbrain periaqueductal gray in the rat. I. Nuclear volume, cell number, density, orientation, and regional subdivisions. J Comp Neurol. 1985 Jul 22;237(4):445–459. doi: 10.1002/cne.902370403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beitz A. J. The organization of afferent projections to the midbrain periaqueductal gray of the rat. Neuroscience. 1982 Jan;7(1):133–159. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(82)90157-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernard J. F., Carroué J., Besson J. M. Efferent projections from the external parabrachial area to the forebrain: a Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin study in the rat. Neurosci Lett. 1991 Jan 28;122(2):257–260. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90872-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernard J. F., Dallel R., Raboisson P., Villanueva L., Le Bars D. Organization of the efferent projections from the spinal cervical enlargement to the parabrachial area and periaqueductal gray: a PHA-L study in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1995 Mar 20;353(4):480–505. doi: 10.1002/cne.903530403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Block C. H., Estes M. L. The cytoarchitectural organization of the human parabrachial nuclear complex. Brain Res Bull. 1990 Apr;24(4):617–626. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(90)90168-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Block C. H., Schwartzbaum J. S. Ascending efferent projections of the gustatory parabrachial nuclei in the rabbit. Brain Res. 1983 Jan 17;259(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)91061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carrive P., Bandler R. Viscerotopic organization of neurons subserving hypotensive reactions within the midbrain periaqueductal grey: a correlative functional and anatomical study. Brain Res. 1991 Feb 15;541(2):206–215. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chamberlin N. L., Saper C. B. Topographic organization of respiratory responses to glutamate microstimulation of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. J Neurosci. 1994 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):6500–6510. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-11-06500.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cowan W. M., Gottlieb D. I., Hendrickson A. E., Price J. L., Woolsey T. A. The autoradiographic demonstration of axonal connections in the central nervous system. Brain Res. 1972 Feb 11;37(1):21–51. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90344-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Feil K., Herbert H. Topographic organization of spinal and trigeminal somatosensory pathways to the rat parabrachial and Kölliker-Fuse nuclei. J Comp Neurol. 1995 Mar 20;353(4):506–528. doi: 10.1002/cne.903530404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Felder R. B., Mifflin S. W. Modulation of carotid sinus afferent input to nucleus tractus solitarius by parabrachial nucleus stimulation. Circ Res. 1988 Jul;63(1):35–49. doi: 10.1161/01.res.63.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fulwiler C. E., Saper C. B. Subnuclear organization of the efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. Brain Res. 1984 Aug;319(3):229–259. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(84)90012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gerfen C. R., Sawchenko P. E. An anterograde neuroanatomical tracing method that shows the detailed morphology of neurons, their axons and terminals: immunohistochemical localization of an axonally transported plant lectin, Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L). Brain Res. 1984 Jan 9;290(2):219–238. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90940-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gioia M., Bianchi R., Tredici G. Cytoarchitecture of the periaqueductal gray matter in the cat: a quantitative Nissl study. Acta Anat (Basel) 1984;119(2):113–117. doi: 10.1159/000145870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Granata A. R., Kitai S. T. Intracellular study of nucleus parabrachialis and nucleus tractus solitarii interconnections. Brain Res. 1989 Jul 17;492(1-2):281–292. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90911-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Halsell C. B., Frank M. E. Mapping study of the parabrachial taste-responsive area for the anterior tongue in the golden hamster. J Comp Neurol. 1991 Apr 22;306(4):708–722. doi: 10.1002/cne.903060412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hamilton B. L. Cytoarchitectural subdivisions of the periaqueductal gray matter in the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1973 May 1;149(1):1–27. doi: 10.1002/cne.901490102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Holstege G. Anatomical evidence for a strong ventral parabrachial projection to nucleus raphe magnus and adjacent tegmental field. Brain Res. 1988 Apr 26;447(1):154–158. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90977-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hubbard J. W., Buchholz R. A., Keeton T. K., Nathan M. A. Parabrachial lesions increase plasma norepinephrine concentration, plasma renin activity and enhance baroreflex sensitivity in the conscious rat. Brain Res. 1987 Sep 22;421(1-2):226–234. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91292-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Izzo P. N. A note on the use of biocytin in anterograde tracing studies in the central nervous system: application at both light and electron microscopic level. J Neurosci Methods. 1991 Feb;36(2-3):155–166. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(91)90041-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jhamandas J. H., Petrov T., Harris K. H., Vu T., Krukoff T. L. Parabrachial nucleus projection to the amygdala in the rat: electrophysiological and anatomical observations. Brain Res Bull. 1996;39(2):115–126. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(95)02084-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jia H. G., Rao Z. R., Shi J. W. An indirect projection from the nucleus of the solitary tract to the central nucleus of the amygdala via the parabrachial nucleus in the rat: a light and electron microscopic study. Brain Res. 1994 Nov 14;663(2):181–190. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91262-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jones B. E., Moore R. Y. Ascending projections of the locus coeruleus in the rat. II. Autoradiographic study. Brain Res. 1977 May 20;127(1):25–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Katayama Y., Tsubokawa T., Maejima S., Yamamoto T. Responses of raphe-spinal neurons to stimulation of the pontine parabrachial region producing behavioral nociceptive suppression in the cat. Appl Neurophysiol. 1986;49(3):112–120. doi: 10.1159/000100136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Keay K. A., Clement C. I., Owler B., Depaulis A., Bandler R. Convergence of deep somatic and visceral nociceptive information onto a discrete ventrolateral midbrain periaqueductal gray region. Neuroscience. 1994 Aug;61(4):727–732. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90395-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. King M. A., Louis P. M., Hunter B. E., Walker D. W. Biocytin: a versatile anterograde neuroanatomical tract-tracing alternative. Brain Res. 1989 Sep 18;497(2):361–367. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90281-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kolesárová D., Petrovický P. Parabrachial nuclear complex in the rat (nuclei parabrachiales and nucleus Koelliker-Fuse). Detailed cytoarchitectonic division and connections compared. J Hirnforsch. 1987;28(5):517–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Krukoff T. L., Harris K. H., Jhamandas J. H. Efferent projections from the parabrachial nucleus demonstrated with the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. Brain Res Bull. 1993;30(1-2):163–172. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(93)90054-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Meller S. T., Dennis B. J. Efferent projections of the periaqueductal gray in the rabbit. Neuroscience. 1991;40(1):191–216. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90185-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Menescal-de-Oliveira L., Hoffmann A. The parabrachial region as a possible region modulating simultaneously pain and tonic immobility. Behav Brain Res. 1993 Sep 30;56(2):127–132. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90030-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moga M. M., Herbert H., Hurley K. M., Yasui Y., Gray T. S., Saper C. B. Organization of cortical, basal forebrain, and hypothalamic afferents to the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1990 May 22;295(4):624–661. doi: 10.1002/cne.902950408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mraovitch S., Kumada M., Reis D. J. Role of the nucleus parabrachialis in cardiovascular regulation in cat. Brain Res. 1982 Jan 28;232(1):57–75. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90610-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ogawa H., Imoto T., Hayama T. Responsiveness of solitario-parabrachial relay neurons to taste and mechanical stimulation applied to the oral cavity in rats. Exp Brain Res. 1984;54(2):349–358. doi: 10.1007/BF00236236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ricardo J. A., Koh E. T. Anatomical evidence of direct projections from the nucleus of the solitary tract to the hypothalamus, amygdala, and other forebrain structures in the rat. Brain Res. 1978 Sep 15;153(1):1–26. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)91125-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Saper C. B., Loewy A. D. Efferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. Brain Res. 1980 Sep 22;197(2):291–317. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91117-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Saper C. B. Reciprocal parabrachial-cortical connections in the rat. Brain Res. 1982 Jun 17;242(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90493-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shammah-Lagnado S. J., Negrão N., Ricardo J. A. Afferent connections of the zona incerta: a horseradish peroxidase study in the rat. Neuroscience. 1985 May;15(1):109–134. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(85)90127-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Somana R., Walberg F. The cerebellar projection from the parabrachial nucleus in the cat. Brain Res. 1979 Aug 17;172(1):144–149. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90902-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sun M. K. Central neural organization and control of sympathetic nervous system in mammals. Prog Neurobiol. 1995 Oct;47(3):157–233. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(95)00026-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Supple W. F., Jr, Kapp B. S. Anatomical and physiological relationships between the anterior cerebellar vermis and the pontine parabrachial nucleus in the rabbit. Brain Res Bull. 1994;33(5):561–574. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(94)90082-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Takayama K., Miura M. Respiratory responses to microinjection of excitatory amino acid agonists in ventrolateral regions of the lateral parabrachial nucleus in the cat. Brain Res. 1993 Feb 26;604(1-2):217–223. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90372-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Takeuchi Y., McLean J. H., Hopkins D. A. Reciprocal connections between the amygdala and parabrachial nuclei: ultrastructural demonstration by degeneration and axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase in the cat. Brain Res. 1982 May 13;239(2):583–588. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90532-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tribollet E., Armstrong W. E., Dubois-Dauphin M., Dreifuss J. J. Extra-hypothalamic afferent inputs to the supraoptic nucleus area of the rat as determined by retrograde and anterograde tracing techniques. Neuroscience. 1985 May;15(1):135–148. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(85)90128-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Voshart K., van der Kooy D. The organization of the efferent projections of the parabrachial nucleus of the forebrain in the rat: a retrograde fluorescent double-labeling study. Brain Res. 1981 May 18;212(2):271–286. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90462-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ward D. G. Neurons in the parabrachial nuclei respond to hemorrhage. Brain Res. 1989 Jul 3;491(1):80–92. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90089-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES