Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 2000 May;196(Pt 4):587–596. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19640587.x

Dopamine and synaptic plasticity in the neostriatum

G W ARBUTHNOTT 1 ,✉, C A INGHAM 1 , J R WICKENS 2
PMCID: PMC1468099  PMID: 10923989

Abstract

After the unilateral destruction of the dopamine input to the neostriatum there are enduring changes in rat behaviour. These have been ascribed to the loss of dopamine and the animals are often referred to as ‘hemiparkinsonian’. In the denervated neostriatum, we have shown that not only are the tyrosine hydroxylase positive boutons missing, but also the medium sized densely spiny output cells have fewer spines. Spines usually have asymmetric synapses on their heads. In a recent stereological study we were able to show that there is a loss of approximately 20% of asymmetric synapses in the lesioned neostriatum by 1 mo after the lesion. Current experiments are trying to establish the specificity of this loss. So far we have evidence suggesting that there is no obvious preferential loss of synapses from either D1 or D2 receptor immunostained dendrites in the neostriatum with damaged dopamine innervation. These experiments suggest that dopamine is somehow necessary for the maintenance of corticostriatal synapses in the neostriatum. In a different series of experiments slices of cortex and neostriatum were maintained in vitro in such a way as to preserve at least some of the corticostriatal connections. In this preparation we have been able to show that cortical stimulation results in robust excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) recorded from inside striatal neurons. Using stimulation protocols derived from the experiments on hippocampal synaptic plasticity we have shown that the usual consequence of trains of high frequency stimulation of the cortex is the depression of the size of EPSPs in the striatal cell. In agreement with similar experiments by others, the effect seems to be influenced by NMDA receptors since the unblocking of these receptors with low Mg++ concentrations in the perfusate uncovers a potentiation of the EPSPs after trains of stimulation. Dopamine applied in the perfusion fluid round the slices has no effect but pulsatile application of dopamine, close to the striatal cell being recorded from, and in temporal association with the cortical trains, leads to a similar LTP like effect. The reduction of K+ channel conductance in the bath with TEA also has the effect of making cortical trains induce potentiation of corticostriatal transmission. TEA applied only to the cell being recorded from has no similar effect; the cortical stimulation again depresses the EPSP amplitude, so the site of action of TEA may well be presynaptic to the striatal cell. The morphological and physiological experiments may not necessarily be related but it is tempting to suggest that dopamine protects some corticostriatal synapses by potentiating them but that in the absence of dopamine others simply disconnect and are no longer detectable on electron microscopy.

Keywords: Corticostriatal pathways, long-term synaptic potentiation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (699.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arbuthnott G. W., Ingham C. A. The thorny problem of what dopamine does in psychiatric disease. Prog Brain Res. 1993;99:341–350. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61356-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bargas J., Ayala G. X., Vilchis C., Pineda J. C., Galarraga E. Ca2+-activated outward currents in neostriatal neurons. Neuroscience. 1999 Jan;88(2):479–488. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00211-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bargas J., Howe A., Eberwine J., Cao Y., Surmeier D. J. Cellular and molecular characterization of Ca2+ currents in acutely isolated, adult rat neostriatal neurons. J Neurosci. 1994 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):6667–6686. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-11-06667.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bouyer J. J., Park D. H., Joh T. H., Pickel V. M. Chemical and structural analysis of the relation between cortical inputs and tyrosine hydroxylase-containing terminals in rat neostriatum. Brain Res. 1984 Jun 8;302(2):267–275. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90239-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buchs P. A., Muller D. Induction of long-term potentiation is associated with major ultrastructural changes of activated synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 23;93(15):8040–8045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.8040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Calabresi P., Maj R., Pisani A., Mercuri N. B., Bernardi G. Long-term synaptic depression in the striatum: physiological and pharmacological characterization. J Neurosci. 1992 Nov;12(11):4224–4233. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-11-04224.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Calabresi P., Mercuri N., Stanzione P., Stefani A., Bernardi G. Intracellular studies on the dopamine-induced firing inhibition of neostriatal neurons in vitro: evidence for D1 receptor involvement. Neuroscience. 1987 Mar;20(3):757–771. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(87)90239-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calabresi P., Pisani A., Mercuri N. B., Bernardi G. Long-term Potentiation in the Striatum is Unmasked by Removing the Voltage-dependent Magnesium Block of NMDA Receptor Channels. Eur J Neurosci. 1992;4(10):929–935. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1992.tb00119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell K., Björklund A. Prefrontal corticostriatal afferents maintain increased enkephalin gene expression in the dopamine-denervated rat striatum. Eur J Neurosci. 1994 Aug 1;6(8):1371–1383. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1994.tb00328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cepeda C., Buchwald N. A., Levine M. S. Neuromodulatory actions of dopamine in the neostriatum are dependent upon the excitatory amino acid receptor subtypes activated. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9576–9580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cowan R. L., Wilson C. J. Spontaneous firing patterns and axonal projections of single corticostriatal neurons in the rat medial agranular cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jan;71(1):17–32. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Crow T. J., Arbuthnott G. W. Function of catecholamine-containing neurones in mammalian central nervous system. Nat New Biol. 1972 Aug 23;238(86):245–246. doi: 10.1038/newbio238245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunnett S. B., Björklund A. Prospects for new restorative and neuroprotective treatments in Parkinson's disease. Nature. 1999 Jun 24;399(6738 Suppl):A32–A39. doi: 10.1038/399a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fifková E., Van Harreveld A. Long-lasting morphological changes in dendritic spines of dentate granular cells following stimulation of the entorhinal area. J Neurocytol. 1977 Apr;6(2):211–230. doi: 10.1007/BF01261506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Freund T. F., Powell J. F., Smith A. D. Tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive boutons in synaptic contact with identified striatonigral neurons, with particular reference to dendritic spines. Neuroscience. 1984 Dec;13(4):1189–1215. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(84)90294-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Garcia-Munoz M., Young S. J., Groves P. M. Presynaptic long-term changes in excitability of the corticostriatal pathway. Neuroreport. 1992 Apr;3(4):357–360. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199204000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Garcia-Munoz M., Young S. J., Groves P. M. Terminal excitability of the corticostriatal pathway. I. Regulation by dopamine receptor stimulation. Brain Res. 1991 Jun 14;551(1-2):195–206. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90933-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Groves P. M., Linder J. C., Young S. J. 5-hydroxydopamine-labeled dopaminergic axons: three-dimensional reconstructions of axons, synapses and postsynaptic targets in rat neostriatum. Neuroscience. 1994 Feb;58(3):593–604. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90084-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Harris N. C. Sensitivity of transient outward rectification to ion channel blocking agents in guinea-pig substantia nigra pars compacta neurones in vitro. Brain Res. 1992 Nov 20;596(1-2):325–329. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91566-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ingham C. A., Hood S. H., Arbuthnott G. W. A light and electron microscopical study of enkephalin-immunoreactive structures in the rat neostriatum after removal of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway. Neuroscience. 1991;42(3):715–730. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90040-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ingham C. A., Hood S. H., Arbuthnott G. W. Spine density on neostriatal neurones changes with 6-hydroxydopamine lesions and with age. Brain Res. 1989 Dec 4;503(2):334–338. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91686-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ingham C. A., Hood S. H., Taggart P., Arbuthnott G. W. Plasticity of synapses in the rat neostriatum after unilateral lesion of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway. J Neurosci. 1998 Jun 15;18(12):4732–4743. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-12-04732.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ingham C. A., Hood S. H., van Maldegem B., Weenink A., Arbuthnott G. W. Morphological changes in the rat neostriatum after unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine injections into the nigrostriatal pathway. Exp Brain Res. 1993;93(1):17–27. doi: 10.1007/BF00227776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kemp J. M., Powell T. P. The termination of fibres from the cerebral cortex and thalamus upon dendritic spines in the caudate nucleus: a study with the Golgi method. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1971 Sep 30;262(845):429–439. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1971.0105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kendall A. L., Rayment F. D., Torres E. M., Baker H. F., Ridley R. M., Dunnett S. B. Functional integration of striatal allografts in a primate model of Huntington's disease. Nat Med. 1998 Jun;4(6):727–729. doi: 10.1038/nm0698-727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Levey A. I., Hersch S. M., Rye D. B., Sunahara R. K., Niznik H. B., Kitt C. A., Price D. L., Maggio R., Brann M. R., Ciliax B. J. Localization of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in brain with subtype-specific antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):8861–8865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.8861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ljungberg T., Apicella P., Schultz W. Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions. J Neurophysiol. 1992 Jan;67(1):145–163. doi: 10.1152/jn.1992.67.1.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lovinger D. M., Tyler E. C., Merritt A. Short- and long-term synaptic depression in rat neostriatum. J Neurophysiol. 1993 Nov;70(5):1937–1949. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.5.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mirenowicz J., Schultz W. Importance of unpredictability for reward responses in primate dopamine neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1994 Aug;72(2):1024–1027. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nisenbaum L. K., Kitai S. T., Crowley W. R., Gerfen C. R. Temporal dissociation between changes in striatal enkephalin and substance P messenger RNAs following striatal dopamine depletion. Neuroscience. 1994 Jun;60(4):927–937. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90272-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Raisman G. Neuronal plasticity in the septal nuclei of the adult rat. Brain Res. 1969 Jun;14(1):25–48. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(69)90029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Reinoso B. S., Undie A. S., Levitt P. Dopamine receptors mediate differential morphological effects on cerebral cortical neurons in vitro. J Neurosci Res. 1996 Feb 15;43(4):439–453. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19960215)43:4<439::AID-JNR5>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rutherford A., Garcia-Munoz M., Arbuthnott G. W. An afterhyperpolarization recorded in striatal cells 'in vitro': effect of dopamine administration. Exp Brain Res. 1988;71(2):399–405. doi: 10.1007/BF00247499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schultz W. Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1998 Jul;80(1):1–27. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Segal M. Dendritic spines for neuroprotection: a hypothesis. Trends Neurosci. 1995 Nov;18(11):468–471. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)92765-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Smith Y., Bennett B. D., Bolam J. P., Parent A., Sadikot A. F. Synaptic relationships between dopaminergic afferents and cortical or thalamic input in the sensorimotor territory of the striatum in monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1994 Jun 1;344(1):1–19. doi: 10.1002/cne.903440102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Spencer G. E., Lukowiak K., Syed N. I. Dopamine regulation of neurite outgrowth from identified Lymnaea neurons in culture. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 1996 Oct;16(5):577–589. doi: 10.1007/BF02152058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Voorn P., Roest G., Groenewegen H. J. Increase of enkephalin and decrease of substance P immunoreactivity in the dorsal and ventral striatum of the rat after midbrain 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Brain Res. 1987 Jun 2;412(2):391–396. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91149-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Walsh J. P. Depression of excitatory synaptic input in rat striatal neurons. Brain Res. 1993 Apr 9;608(1):123–128. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90782-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wickens J. R., Begg A. J., Arbuthnott G. W. Dopamine reverses the depression of rat corticostriatal synapses which normally follows high-frequency stimulation of cortex in vitro. Neuroscience. 1996 Jan;70(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00436-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wickens J. R., Mckenzie D., Costanzo E., Arbuthnott G. W. Effects of potassium channel blockers on synaptic plasticity in the corticostriatal pathway. Neuropharmacology. 1998 Apr-May;37(4-5):523–533. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(98)00054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wright A. K., Norrie L., Ingham C. A., Hutton E. A., Arbuthnott G. W. Double anterograde tracing of outputs from adjacent "barrel columns" of rat somatosensory cortex. Neostriatal projection patterns and terminal ultrastructure. Neuroscience. 1999 Jan;88(1):119–133. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00186-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Young W. S., 3rd, Bonner T. I., Brann M. R. Mesencephalic dopamine neurons regulate the expression of neuropeptide mRNAs in the rat forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(24):9827–9831. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.24.9827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES