Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 2000 Oct;197(Pt 3):383–391. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19730383.x

Intact myelinated fibres in biopsies of ventral spinal roots after preganglionic traction injury to the brachial plexus. A proof that Sherrington's ‘wrong way afferents’ exist in man?

MICHAEL SCHENKER 1, ROLFE BIRCH 1,✉
PMCID: PMC1468140  PMID: 11117625

Abstract

Bell-Magendie's law of separation of spinal function states that afferent and efferent fibres join the spinal cord separately in ventral and dorsal spinal nerve roots. For over 100 years there have been reports that challenge the exclusiveness of this law in mammals; very few studies have referred to man. We conducted a prospective morphological study in patients with preganglionic traction injuries of the brachial plexus to address this question. Avulsed ventral and dorsal roots were examined after variable intervals from the injury for histological and ultrastructural evidence for myelinated afferent fibres entering the cord via the ventral roots. Intact myelinated fibres were found in all ventral root specimens, but the majority of fibres in later biopsies are regenerative. A small number of fibres could be demonstrated that are likely to be ‘wrong way ventral afferents’. Their number is falsely low due to wallerian degeneration of dorsal and ventral afferents following the mechanical and ischaemic effects of traction injury. Our findings are the first morphological evidence in human material that Bell-Magendie's law might not entirely be correct and they underline the difficulties in comparing traumatic with experimental rhizotomy.

Keywords: Brachial plexus injury, ventral root afferents

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (795.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abernethy D. A., Rud A., Thomas P. K. Neurotropic influence of the distal stump of transected peripheral nerve on axonal regeneration: absence of topographic specificity in adult nerve. J Anat. 1992 Jun;180(Pt 3):395–400. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BONNEY G. The value of axon responses in determining the site of lesion in traction injuries of the brachial plexus. Brain. 1954 Dec;77(4):588–609. doi: 10.1093/brain/77.4.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berman J. S., Birch R., Anand P. Pain following human brachial plexus injury with spinal cord root avulsion and the effect of surgery. Pain. 1998 Apr;75(2-3):199–207. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00220-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Birch R. Brachial plexus injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Nov;78(6):986–992. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x78b6.14190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brindley G. S. The Ferrier lecture, 1986. The actions of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerves in human micturition, erection and seminal emission, and their restoration in paraplegic patients by implanted electrical stimulators. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988 Nov 22;235(1279):111–120. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1988.0066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chung J. M., Lee K. H., Endo K., Coggeshall R. E. Activation of central neurons by ventral root afferents. Science. 1983 Nov 25;222(4626):934–935. doi: 10.1126/science.6635665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coggeshall R. E., Applebaum M. L., Fazen M., Stubbs T. B., 3rd, Sykes M. T. Unmyelinated axons in human ventral roots, a possible explanation for the failure of dorsal rhizotomy to relieve pain. Brain. 1975 Mar;98(1):157–166. doi: 10.1093/brain/98.1.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coggeshall R. E., Coulter J. D., Willis W. D., Jr Unmyelinated axons in the ventral roots of the cat lumbosacral enlargement. J Comp Neurol. 1974 Jan 1;153(1):39–58. doi: 10.1002/cne.901530105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coggeshall R. E. Law of separation of function of the spinal roots. Physiol Rev. 1980 Jul;60(3):716–755. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1980.60.3.716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fawcett J. W., Keynes R. J. Peripheral nerve regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:43–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ide C. Peripheral nerve regeneration. Neurosci Res. 1996 Jun;25(2):101–121. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(96)01042-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Loeb G. E. Ventral root projections of myelinated dorsal root ganglion cells in the cat. Brain Res. 1976 Apr 16;106(1):159–165. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90081-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Phillips L. H., 2nd, Park T. S., Shaffrey M. E., Shaffrey C. L. Electrophysiological evidence for afferent nerve fibers in human ventral roots. Muscle Nerve. 2000 Mar;23(3):410–415. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(200003)23:3<410::aid-mus13>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Risling M., Dalsgaard C. J., Cukierman A., Cuello A. C. Electron microscopic and immunohistochemical evidence that unmyelinated ventral root axons make u-turns or enter the spinal pia mater. J Comp Neurol. 1984 May 1;225(1):53–63. doi: 10.1002/cne.902250107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sherrington C. S. On the Anatomical Constitution of Nerves of Skeletal Muscles; with Remarks on Recurrent Fibres in the Ventral Spinal Nerve-root. J Physiol. 1894 Oct 15;17(3-4):210.2–21258. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1894.sp000528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vergara I., Oberpaur B., Alvarez J. Ventral root nonmedullated fibers: proportion, calibers, and microtubular content. J Comp Neurol. 1986 Jun 22;248(4):550–554. doi: 10.1002/cne.902480407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES