Abstract
The disposable soma theory suggests that longevity is determined through the setting of longevity assurance mechanisms so as to provide an optimal compromise between investments in somatic maintenance (including stress resistance) and in reproduction. A corollary is that species with low extrinsic mortality are predicted to invest relatively more effort in maintenance, resulting in slower intrinsic ageing, than species with high extrinsic mortality. We tested this prediction in a comparative study of stress resistance in primary skin fibroblasts and confirmed that cells from long-lived species are indeed more resistant to a variant of stressors. A widely studied example of within-species variation in lifespan is the rodent calorie restriction model. Food-restricted animals show elevations in a range of stress response mechanisms, and it has been suggested that this is an outcome of natural selection for life history plasticity. We have developed a theoretical model for dynamic optimisation of the allocation of effort to maintenance and reproduction in response to fluctuations in food availability. The model supports the suggestion that the response to calorie restriction may be an evolutionary adaptation, raising interesting questions about the hierarchy of genetic control of multiple stress response systems. The model identifies ecological factors likely to support such an adaptation that may be relevant in considering the likely relevance of a similar response to calorie restriction in other species. Comparative and theoretical studies support the role of somatic maintenance and stress response systems in controlling the rate of ageing.
Keywords: Stress response systems, ageing
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (269.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berry R. J., Bronson F. H. Life history and bioeconomy of the house mouse. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1992 Nov;67(4):519–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1992.tb01192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holliday R. Food, reproduction and longevity: is the extended lifespan of calorie-restricted animals an evolutionary adaptation? Bioessays. 1989 Apr;10(4):125–127. doi: 10.1002/bies.950100408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kapahi P., Boulton M. E., Kirkwood T. B. Positive correlation between mammalian life span and cellular resistance to stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999 Mar;26(5-6):495–500. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00323-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkwood T. B. Evolution of ageing. Nature. 1977 Nov 24;270(5635):301–304. doi: 10.1038/270301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkwood T. B., Franceschi C. Is aging as complex as it would appear? New perspectives in aging research. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992 Nov 21;663:412–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb38685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masoro E. J., Austad S. N. The evolution of the antiaging action of dietary restriction: a hypothesis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996 Nov;51(6):B387–B391. doi: 10.1093/gerona/51a.6.b387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masoro E. J. Dietary restriction and aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Sep;41(9):994–999. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06767.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shanley D. P., Kirkwood T. B. Calorie restriction and aging: a life-history analysis. Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):740–750. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sprott R. L. Diet and calorie restriction. Exp Gerontol. 1997 Jan-Apr;32(1-2):205–214. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(96)00065-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weed J. L., Lane M. A., Roth G. S., Speer D. L., Ingram D. K. Activity measures in rhesus monkeys on long-term calorie restriction. Physiol Behav. 1997 Jul;62(1):97–103. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00147-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu B. P. How diet influences the aging process of the rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1994 Feb;205(2):97–105. doi: 10.3181/00379727-205-43684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]