Abstract
The mechanics of mammalian intervertebral joints are complicated by the viscoelastic nature of the connective tissues joining vertebrae, and by multiple vertebral articulations and complex morphologies. Further, interspecific variation in these structures can greatly compound their functional variation between species, making comparative mechanical analyses even more difficult. Despite these sources of variation however, mammalian intervertebral joints universally exhibit a creep relaxation behaviour based on the viscoelastic nature of the soft tissue joint. We have evaluated, in 6 degrees of freedom, the mechanical signature of a novel mammalian lumbar intervertebral joint found in the Scutisorex spine, and compared it with a more typical mammalian joint in the Rattus (rat) lumbar spine. Scutisorex, the hero shrew, is an East African species of shrew with what is likely the most highly modified vertebral morphology in the entire history of mammals. Thus we decided to evaluate the mechanical behaviour of the intervertebral joint of this species, comparing it with a more representative mammal species in Rattus. We built a custom, 6 degrees of freedom, intervertebral joint transducer and a combined axial moment and load application system in order to quantify and compare the complex mechanical behaviour of these joints. Our results suggest that the Scutisorex joint is 5 times more resilient to simple axial torsion per body mass unit than Rattus, and that the complex load (combined axial compression and torsion) mechanical signature of Scutisorex is probably novel among all mammalian intervertebral joints. Under significant but physiological axial compression the Scutisorex intervertebral joint demonstrates no creep relaxation behaviour, simulating the mechanical behaviour of a rigid construct rather than a viscoelastic joint. The purpose of this rigid intervertebral joint in the ecology of Scutisorex remains unknown.
Keywords: Osteology, joints, biomechanics, spine
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BROWN T., HANSEN R. J., YORRA A. J. Some mechanical tests on the lumbosacral spine with particular reference to the intervertebral discs; a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957 Oct;39-A(5):1135–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodwin R. R., James K. S., Daniels A. U., Dunn H. K. Distraction and compression loads enhance spine torsional stiffness. J Biomech. 1994 Aug;27(8):1049–1057. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gould S. J., Lewontin R. C. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):581–598. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gál J. M. Mammalian spinal biomechanics. I. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of intact intervertebral joints. J Exp Biol. 1993 Jan;174:247–280. doi: 10.1242/jeb.174.1.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HIRSCH C., NACHEMSON A. New observations on the mechanical behavior of lumbar discs. Acta Orthop Scand. 1954;23(4):254–283. doi: 10.3109/17453675408991217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hazlett J. W., Kinnard P. Lumbar apophyseal process excision and spinal instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1982 Mar-Apr;7(2):171–176. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198203000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- VIRGIN W. J. Experimental investigations into the physical properties of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951 Nov;33-B(4):607–611. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.33B4.607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]