Skip to main content
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 2001 Sep;199(Pt 3):273–287. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19930273.x

Frequency variations of discrete cranial traits in major human populations. IV. Vessel and nerve related variations

TSUNEHIKO HANIHARA 1 ,, HAJIME ISHIDA 2
PMCID: PMC1468330  PMID: 11554505

Abstract

This concludes a series of descriptive statistical reports on discrete cranial traits in 81 human populations from around the world. Four variants classified as vessel and nerve related characters were investigated: patent condylar canal; supraorbital foramen; accessory infraorbital foramen; and accessory mental foramen. A significant asymmetric occurrence without any side preference was detected for the accessory mental foramen. Significant intertrait associations were found between the accessory infraorbital and supraorbital foramina in the panPacific region and Subsaharan African samples. The intertrait associations between the accessory infraorbital foramen and some traits classified as hypostotic were found mainly in the samples from the western part of the Old World, and those as hyperostotic traits in the samples from eastern Asian and the related population samples. With a few exceptions, the occurrence of a patent condylar canal and a supraorbital foramen was predominant in females, but the accessory infraorbital and accessory mental foramina were predominant in males. The frequency distributions of the traits showed interregional clinality and intraregional discontinuity. A temporal trend was found in the Northeast Asian region in the frequencies of the accessory infraorbital and accessory mental foramina. The diversity of modern human discrete cranial traits may at least in part be attributable to differential retention or intensification from an ancestral pattern.

Keywords: Osteology, geographic variation, nonmetric cranial traits

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carolineberry A., Berry R. J. Epigenetic variation in the human cranium. J Anat. 1967 Apr;101(Pt 2):361–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Corruccini R. S. An examination of the meaning of cranial discrete traits for human skeletal biological studies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1974 May;40(3):425–445. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330400315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gershenson A., Nathan H., Luchansky E. Mental foramen and mental nerve: changes with age. Acta Anat (Basel) 1986;126(1):21–28. doi: 10.1159/000146181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hanihara T., Ishida H. Frequency variations of discrete cranial traits in major human populations. I. Supernumerary ossicle variations. J Anat. 2001 Jun;198(Pt 6):689–706. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19860689.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hanihara T., Ishida H. Frequency variations of discrete cranial traits in major human populations. II. Hypostotic variations. J Anat. 2001 Jun;198(Pt 6):707–725. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19860707.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hanihara T., Ishida H. Frequency variations of discrete cranial traits in major human populations. III. Hyperostotic variations. J Anat. 2001 Sep;199(Pt 3):251–272. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19930251.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Korey K. A. The incidence of bilateral nonmetric skeletal traits: a reanalysis of sampling procedures. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1980 Jul;53(1):19–23. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330530105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Livshits G., Kobyliansky E. Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: a review. Hum Biol. 1991 Aug;63(4):441–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MURPHY T. The chin region of the Australian aboriginal mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1957 Dec;15(4):517–535. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330150404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Manzi G., Gracia A., Arsuaga J. L. Cranial discrete traits in the middle pleistocene humans from Sima de los Huesos (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). Does hypostosis represent any increase in "ontogenetic stress" along the Neanderthal lineage? J Hum Evol. 2000 Mar;38(3):425–446. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Turner C. G., 2nd Major features of Sundadonty and Sinodonty, including suggestions about East Asian microevolution, population history, and late Pleistocene relationships with Australian aboriginals. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990 Jul;82(3):295–317. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330820308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. WARWICK R. The relation of the direction of the mental foramen to the growth of the human mandible. J Anat. 1950 Apr;84(2):116–120. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES