Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1997 Aug 1;25(15):3026–3033. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.15.3026

DNA binding and transactivation properties of Fos variants with homodimerization capacity.

D Porte 1, P Oertel-Buchheit 1, M John 1, M Granger-Schnarr 1, M Schnarr 1
PMCID: PMC146843  PMID: 9304112

Abstract

The mammalian Fos and Fos-related proteins are unable to form homodimers and to bind DNA in the absence of a second protein, like c-Jun for example. In order to study the implications of hydrophobic point mutations in the c-Fox leucine zipper on DNA binding of the entire c-Fos protein, we have constructed and purified a set of Fos mutant proteins harboring one or several isoleucine or leucine residues in the five Fos zipper a positions. We show that a single point mutation in the hydrophobic interface of the c-Fos leucine zipper enables the c-Fos mutant protein to bind specifically to an oligonucleotide duplex harboring the TRE consensus sequence TGA(C/G)TCA. This point mutation (Thr196-->Ile) is situated in the a position of the second heptade (a2) of the Fos zipper. The introduction of additional isoleucine residues in the other a positions progressively increases the DNA binding affinity of these homodimerizing Fos zipper variants. Heterodimerization of these c-Fos variants with c-Jun reveals a complex behavior, in that the DNA binding affinity of these heterodimers does not simply increase with the number of isoleucine side chains in position a. For example, a c-Fos variant harboring a wild-type Thr in position a1 aad Ile in the four other a positions (c-Fos4I) interacts more tightly with c-Jun than a variant harboring Ile in all five a positions (c-Fos5I). The same holds true for the corresponding leucine variants, suggesting that the wild-type a1 residue of the Fox zipper (Thr162) is thermodynamically relevant for Fos-Jun heterodimer formations and DNA binding. The c-Fos4I variant forms heterodimers with c-Jun slightly better than the wild-type zipper protein, suggesting that the driving force for Fos-Jun heterodimerization is not the simple fact that the Fos protein is unable to form homodimers. These c-Fos variants were further tested for their transactivation properties in F9 and NIH3T3 cells. At low expression levels the most efficiently homodimerizing variant (c-Fos5I) activates transcription in F9 cells about 6-fold. However part of this activation may be due to the formation of heterodimers with a member of the Jun family (like JunD for example), since a wild type c-Fos expression vector confers a 3-fold activation under these conditions. In the case of the homodimerizing c-Fos variants however, this activation is abrogated at higher expression levels due to a strong inhibition of basal transcription activity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (401.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abate C., Luk D., Curran T. A ubiquitous nuclear protein stimulates the DNA-binding activity of fos and jun indirectly. Cell Growth Differ. 1990 Oct;1(10):455–462. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Angel P., Smeal T., Meek J., Karin M. Jun and v-jun contain multiple regions that participate in transcriptional activation in an interdependent manner. New Biol. 1989 Oct;1(1):35–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown H. J., Sutherland J. A., Cook A., Bannister A. J., Kouzarides T. An inhibitor domain in c-Fos regulates activation domains containing the HOB1 motif. EMBO J. 1995 Jan 3;14(1):124–131. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb06982.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Galien R., Emanoil-Ravier R., Mercier G. Differential effects of c-jun and CREB on c-AMP response element activation by Ha-ras. Oncogene. 1994 Apr;9(4):1101–1108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gius D., Cao X. M., Rauscher F. J., 3rd, Cohen D. R., Curran T., Sukhatme V. P. Transcriptional activation and repression by Fos are independent functions: the C terminus represses immediate-early gene expression via CArG elements. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;10(8):4243–4255. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.8.4243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Glover J. N., Harrison S. C. Crystal structure of the heterodimeric bZIP transcription factor c-Fos-c-Jun bound to DNA. Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):257–261. doi: 10.1038/373257a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Graham F. L., van der Eb A. J. Transformation of rat cells by DNA of human adenovirus 5. Virology. 1973 Aug;54(2):536–539. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(73)90163-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Green S., Issemann I., Sheer E. A versatile in vivo and in vitro eukaryotic expression vector for protein engineering. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jan 11;16(1):369–369. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.1.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Halazonetis T. D., Georgopoulos K., Greenberg M. E., Leder P. c-Jun dimerizes with itself and with c-Fos, forming complexes of different DNA binding affinities. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):917–924. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90147-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harbury P. B., Zhang T., Kim P. S., Alber T. A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants. Science. 1993 Nov 26;262(5138):1401–1407. doi: 10.1126/science.8248779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hirai S., Bourachot B., Yaniv M. Both Jun and Fos contribute to transcription activation by the heterodimer. Oncogene. 1990 Jan;5(1):39–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hurst H. C. Transcription factors. 1: bZIP proteins. Protein Profile. 1994;1(2):123–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. John M., Briand J. P., Granger-Schnarr M., Schnarr M. Two pairs of oppositely charged amino acids from Jun and Fos confer heterodimerization to GCN4 leucine zipper. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jun 10;269(23):16247–16253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. John M., Leppik R., Busch S. J., Granger-Schnarr M., Schnarr M. DNA binding of Jun and Fos bZip domains: homodimers and heterodimers induce a DNA conformational change in solution. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Nov 15;24(22):4487–4494. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.22.4487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kryszke M. H., Piette J., Yaniv M. Induction of a factor that binds to the polyoma virus A enhancer on differentiation of embryonal carcinoma cells. Nature. 1987 Jul 16;328(6127):254–256. doi: 10.1038/328254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. König H., Ponta H., Rahmsdorf U., Büscher M., Schönthal A., Rahmsdorf H. J., Herrlich P. Autoregulation of fos: the dyad symmetry element as the major target of repression. EMBO J. 1989 Sep;8(9):2559–2566. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08394.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lech K., Anderson K., Brent R. DNA-bound Fos proteins activate transcription in yeast. Cell. 1988 Jan 29;52(2):179–184. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90506-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lucibello F. C., Lowag C., Neuberg M., Müller R. trans-repression of the mouse c-fos promoter: a novel mechanism of Fos-mediated trans-regulation. Cell. 1989 Dec 22;59(6):999–1007. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90756-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McBride K., Robitaille L., Tremblay S., Argentin S., Nemer M. fos/jun repression of cardiac-specific transcription in quiescent and growth-stimulated myocytes is targeted at a tissue-specific cis element. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jan;13(1):600–612. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.1.600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nakabeppu Y., Nathans D. The basic region of Fos mediates specific DNA binding. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 1;8(12):3833–3841. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08561.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nicklin M. J., Casari G. A single site mutation in a truncated Fos protein allows it to interact with the TRE in vitro. Oncogene. 1991 Jan;6(1):173–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. O'Shea E. K., Rutkowski R., Kim P. S. Mechanism of specificity in the Fos-Jun oncoprotein heterodimer. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):699–708. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90145-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. O'Shea E. K., Rutkowski R., Stafford W. F., 3rd, Kim P. S. Preferential heterodimer formation by isolated leucine zippers from fos and jun. Science. 1989 Aug 11;245(4918):646–648. doi: 10.1126/science.2503872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ofir R., Dwarki V. J., Rashid D., Verma I. M. Phosphorylation of the C terminus of Fos protein is required for transcriptional transrepression of the c-fos promoter. Nature. 1990 Nov 1;348(6296):80–82. doi: 10.1038/348080a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Perkins K. K., Admon A., Patel N., Tjian R. The Drosophila Fos-related AP-1 protein is a developmentally regulated transcription factor. Genes Dev. 1990 May;4(5):822–834. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.5.822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Piette J., Hirai S., Yaniv M. Constitutive synthesis of activator protein 1 transcription factor after viral transformation of mouse fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 May;85(10):3401–3405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.10.3401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Porte D., Oertel-Buchheit P., Granger-Schnarr M., Schnarr M. Fos leucine zipper variants with increased association capacity. J Biol Chem. 1995 Sep 29;270(39):22721–22730. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.39.22721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ryder K., Lanahan A., Perez-Albuerne E., Nathans D. jun-D: a third member of the jun gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(5):1500–1503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sassone-Corsi P., Sisson J. C., Verma I. M. Transcriptional autoregulation of the proto-oncogene fos. Nature. 1988 Jul 28;334(6180):314–319. doi: 10.1038/334314a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmidt-Dörr T., Oertel-Buchheit P., Pernelle C., Bracco L., Schnarr M., Granger-Schnarr M. Construction, purification, and characterization of a hybrid protein comprising the DNA binding domain of the LexA repressor and the Jun leucine zipper: a circular dichroism and mutagenesis study. Biochemistry. 1991 Oct 8;30(40):9657–9664. doi: 10.1021/bi00104a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Turner R., Tjian R. Leucine repeats and an adjacent DNA binding domain mediate the formation of functional cFos-cJun heterodimers. Science. 1989 Mar 31;243(4899):1689–1694. doi: 10.1126/science.2494701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilson T., Treisman R. Fos C-terminal mutations block down-regulation of c-fos transcription following serum stimulation. EMBO J. 1988 Dec 20;7(13):4193–4202. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03316.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Xanthoudakis S., Curran T. Analysis of c-Fos and c-Jun redox-dependent DNA binding activity. Methods Enzymol. 1994;234:163–174. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(94)34086-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES