Abstract
This paper explores the use of precaution-based approaches as policy tools when responding to concerns about power-frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF) in community environments. The combination of public concern and scientific uncertainty about potential health impacts from exposure to EMF challenges society to adopt EMF policies that balance the benefits of electric power against the possibility that some aspect of the use of electricity may be harmful. Inappropriate policy responses can undermine the economics of society's use of electricity and have other adverse consequences on public health. These adverse consequences result from the inappropriate diversion of scarce public and private resources. Precaution-based approaches are rooted in individual concepts of common sense and can be an effective component of a comprehensive set of EMF policy options. Precaution-based approaches do not replace science-based policy options and should only be used when the available science-based guidelines are not applicable. The application of these approaches should balance the real and expected costs and benefits of taking or not taking action. Given our current scientific knowledge, actions taken to reduce EMF exposure should necessarily be low cost because the expected benefits are uncertain. Society also needs to avoid adopting EMF policies that could incur high costs from distorting resources from other, more important, personal and public health priorities.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Adair R. K. Constraints of thermal noise on the effects of weak 60-Hz magnetic fields acting on biological magnetite. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):2925–2929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arrow K. J., Cropper M. L., Eads G. C., Hahn R. W., Lave L. B., Noll R. G., Portney P. R., Russell M., Schmalensee R., Smith V. K. Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? Science. 1996 Apr 12;272(5259):221–222. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5259.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardell L., Holmberg B., Malker H., Paulsson L. E. Exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and the risk of malignant diseases--an evaluation of epidemiological and experimental findings. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1995 Sep;4 (Suppl 1):3–107. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199509001-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heath C. W., Jr Electromagnetic field exposure and cancer: a review of epidemiologic evidence. CA Cancer J Clin. 1996 Jan-Feb;46(1):29–44. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.46.1.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hendee W. R., Boteler J. C. The question of health effects from exposure to electromagnetic fields. Health Phys. 1994 Feb;66(2):127–136. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199402000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCann J., Dietrich F., Rafferty C., Martin A. O. A critical review of the genotoxic potential of electric and magnetic fields. Mutat Res. 1993 Jul;297(1):61–95. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(93)90008-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tenforde T. S. Biological interactions and potential health effects of extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields from power lines and other common sources. Annu Rev Public Health. 1992;13:173–196. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.001133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tenforde T. S., Kaune W. T. Interaction of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with humans. Health Phys. 1987 Dec;53(6):585–606. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198712000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood A. W. Possible health effects of 50/60Hz electric and magnetic fields: review of proposed mechanisms. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 1993 Mar;16(1):1–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]