Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1997 Mar;105(Suppl 2):515–519. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s2515

Empirical approaches for the investigation of toxicant-induced loss of tolerance.

C Miller 1, N Ashford 1, R Doty 1, M Lamielle 1, D Otto 1, A Rahill 1, L Wallace 1
PMCID: PMC1469807  PMID: 9167989

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that sensitivity to low-level chemical exposures develops in two steps: initiation by an acute or chronic chemical exposure, followed by triggering of symptoms by low levels of previously tolerated chemical inhalants, foods, or drugs. The Working Group on Toxicant-induced Loss of Tolerance has formulated a series of research questions to test this hypothesis: Do some individuals experience sensitivity to chemicals at levels of exposure unexplained by classical toxicological thresholds and dose-response relationships, and outside normally expected variation in the population? Do chemically sensitive subjects exhibit masking that may interfere with the reproducibility of their responses to chemical challenges? Does chemical sensitivity develop because of acute, intermittent, or continuous exposure to certain substances? If so, what substances are most likely to initiate this process? An experimental approach for testing directly the relationship between patients' reported symptoms and specific exposures was outlined in response to the first question, which was felt to be a key question. Double-blind, placebo-controlled challenges performed in an environmentally controlled hospital facility (environmental medical unit) coupled with rigorous documentation of both objective and subjective responses are necessary to answer this question and to help elucidate the nature and origins of chemical sensitivity.

Full text

PDF
515

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell I. R., Miller C. S., Schwartz G. E. An olfactory-limbic model of multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: possible relationships to kindling and affective spectrum disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 1992 Aug 1;32(3):218–242. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(92)90105-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cone J. E., Sult T. A. Acquired intolerance to solvents following pesticide/solvent exposure in a building: a new group of workers at risk for multiple chemical sensitivities? Toxicol Ind Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):29–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doty R. L., Shaman P., Dann M. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav. 1984 Mar;32(3):489–502. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90269-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koller W., Vetere-Overfield B., Gray C., Alexander C., Chin T., Dolezal J., Hassanein R., Tanner C. Environmental risk factors in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 1990 Aug;40(8):1218–1221. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.8.1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller C. S., Mitzel H. C. Chemical sensitivity attributed to pesticide exposure versus remodeling. Arch Environ Health. 1995 Mar-Apr;50(2):119–129. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1995.9940889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller C. S. Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance--an emerging theory of disease? Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Mar;105 (Suppl 2):445–453. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s2445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Miller C. S. White paper: Chemical sensitivity: history and phenomenology. Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 Jul-Oct;10(4-5):253–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Olin K. L., Cherr G. N., Rifkin E., Keen C. L. The effects of some redox-active metals and reactive aldehydes on DNA-protein cross-links in vitro. Toxicology. 1996 Jun 17;110(1-3):1–8. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(96)03318-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES