Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1997 Apr;105(Suppl 3):685–687. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s3685

Mechanisms, proof, and unmet needs: the perspective of a cancer activist.

S Steingraber 1
PMCID: PMC1469905  PMID: 9168015

Abstract

Cancer activists who participate with cancer researchers in shaping public health policy provide a different perspective on the question of breast cancer etiology. We place a higher priority on reducing women's exposure to suspected breast carcinogens than in debating the specific biochemical mechanisms by which these agents may operate. As the fruits of AIDS activism and antismoking campaigns illustrate, answers to mechanistic questions have not been and should not be the driving force behind public health policy. As such, cancer activists embrace a form of conservatism that advocates prudence in the face of exposure to estrogenic and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals. This perspective stands in contrast to scientific conservatism, which directs its caution toward the issue of proof. Unmet needs for cancer activists refer not so much to data gaps as to the failure to eliminate ongoing cancer hazards. For this author and activist, unmet needs include ending women's continued exposure to such common estrogenic compounds as detergents, triazine herbicides, plastics, and polychlorinated biphenyls.

Full text

PDF
685

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergeron J. M., Crews D., McLachlan J. A. PCBs as environmental estrogens: turtle sex determination as a biomarker of environmental contamination. Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Sep;102(9):780–781. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biradar D. P., Rayburn A. L. Flow cytogenetic analysis of whole cell clastogenicity of herbicides found in groundwater. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1995 Jan;28(1):13–17. doi: 10.1007/BF00213963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiazze L., Jr, Nichols W. E., Wong O. Mortality among employees of PVC fabricators. J Occup Med. 1977 Sep;19(9):623–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Donna A., Betta P. G., Robutti F., Crosignani P., Berrino F., Bellingeri D. Ovarian mesothelial tumors and herbicides: a case-control study. Carcinogenesis. 1984 Jul;5(7):941–942. doi: 10.1093/carcin/5.7.941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donna A., Crosignani P., Robutti F., Betta P. G., Bocca R., Mariani N., Ferrario F., Fissi R., Berrino F. Triazine herbicides and ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1989 Feb;15(1):47–53. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Garfinkel L. Perspectives on cancer prevention. CA Cancer J Clin. 1995 Jan-Feb;45(1):5–7. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.45.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Infante P. F., Pesák J. A historical perspective of some occupationally related diseases of women. J Occup Med. 1994 Aug;36(8):826–831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Infante P. F., Pohl G. K. Living in a chemical world: actions and reactions to industrial carcinogens. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 1988;8(4):225–249. doi: 10.1002/tcm.1770080406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jobling S., Reynolds T., White R., Parker M. G., Sumpter J. P. A variety of environmentally persistent chemicals, including some phthalate plasticizers, are weakly estrogenic. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Jun;103(6):582–587. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. White R., Jobling S., Hoare S. A., Sumpter J. P., Parker M. G. Environmentally persistent alkylphenolic compounds are estrogenic. Endocrinology. 1994 Jul;135(1):175–182. doi: 10.1210/endo.135.1.8013351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES