Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
letter
. 1997 Mar;105(3):266–268. doi: 10.1289/ehp.105-1469992

Reply to comments on "A reevaluation of cancer incidence near the Three Mile Island".

S Wing, D Richardson, D Armstrong
PMCID: PMC1469992  PMID: 9171981

Full text

PDF
266

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Greenberg M. The evolution of attitudes to the human hazards of ionizing radiation and to its investigators. Am J Ind Med. 1991;20(6):717–721. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700200602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Greenland S. Randomization, statistics, and causal inference. Epidemiology. 1990 Nov;1(6):421–429. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199011000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hatch M. C., Beyea J., Nieves J. W., Susser M. Cancer near the Three Mile Island nuclear plant: radiation emissions. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Sep;132(3):397–417. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hatch M. C., Wallenstein S., Beyea J., Nieves J. W., Susser M. Cancer rates after the Three Mile Island nuclear accident and proximity of residence to the plant. Am J Public Health. 1991 Jun;81(6):719–724. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.6.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hatch M., Susser M., Beyea J. Comments on "A reevaluation of cancer incidence near the Three Mile Island nuclear plant". Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Jan;105(1):12–12. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9710512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sterling T. D. The health effects of low-dose radiation on atomic workers. A case study of employer-directed research. Int J Health Serv. 1980;10(1):37–46. doi: 10.2190/TEDB-E2YU-5CQQ-01NR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wing S., Richardson D., Armstrong D., Crawford-Brown D. A reevaluation of cancer incidence near the Three Mile Island nuclear plant: the collision of evidence and assumptions. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Jan;105(1):52–57. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9710552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES