Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1997 Oct 15;25(20):4041–4047. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.20.4041

Target choice determinants of the Tc1 transposon of Caenorhabditis elegans.

R F Ketting 1, S E Fischer 1, R H Plasterk 1
PMCID: PMC147011  PMID: 9321655

Abstract

The Tc1 transposon of Caenorhabditis elegans always integrates into the sequence TA, but some TA sites are preferred to others. We investigated a TA target site from the gpa-2 gene of C.elegans that was previously found to be preferred (hot) for Tc1 integration in vivo . This site with its immediate flanks was cloned into a plasmid, and remained hot in vitro , showing that sequences immediately adjacent to the TA dinucleotide determine this target choice. Further deletion mapping and mutagenesis showed that a 4 bp sequence on one side of the TA is sufficient to make a site hot; this sequence nicely fits the previously identified Tc1 consensus sequence for integration. In addition, we found a second type of hot site: this site is only preferred for integration when the target DNA is supercoiled, not when it is relaxed. Excision frequencies were relatively independent of the flanking sequences. The distribution of Tc1 insertions into a plasmid was similar when we used nuclear extracts or purified Tc1 transposase in vitro , showing that the Tc1 transposase is the protein responsible for the target choice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Auge-Gouillou C., Bigot Y., Pollet N., Hamelin M. H., Meunier-Rotival M., Periquet G. Human and other mammalian genomes contain transposons of the mariner family. FEBS Lett. 1995 Jul 24;368(3):541–546. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00735-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bainton R. J., Kubo K. M., Feng J. N., Craig N. L. Tn7 transposition: target DNA recognition is mediated by multiple Tn7-encoded proteins in a purified in vitro system. Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):931–943. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90581-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bender J., Kleckner N. IS10 transposase mutations that specifically alter target site recognition. EMBO J. 1992 Feb;11(2):741–750. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05107.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bender J., Kleckner N. Tn10 insertion specificity is strongly dependent upon sequences immediately adjacent to the target-site consensus sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):7996–8000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.7996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casadesus J., Roth J. R. Absence of insertions among spontaneous mutants of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Apr;216(2-3):210–216. doi: 10.1007/BF00334358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Craig N. L. Tn7: a target site-specific transposon. Mol Microbiol. 1991 Nov;5(11):2569–2573. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01964.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Craigie R. Hotspots and warm spots: integration specificity of retroelements. Trends Genet. 1992 Jun;8(6):187–190. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90223-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Curcio M. J., Morse R. H. Tying together integration and chromatin. Trends Genet. 1996 Nov;12(11):436–438. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)30107-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies C. J., Hutchison C. A., 3rd Insertion site specificity of the transposon Tn3. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Feb 11;23(3):507–514. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.3.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eide D., Anderson P. Insertion and excision of Caenorhabditis elegans transposable element Tc1. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):737–746. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellison M. J., Fenton M. J., Ho P. S., Rich A. Long-range interactions of multiple DNA structural transitions within a common topological domain. EMBO J. 1987 May;6(5):1513–1522. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02394.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Freund R., Meselson M. Long terminal repeat nucleotide sequence and specific insertion of the gypsy transposon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(14):4462–4464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.14.4462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hallet B., Rezsöhazy R., Mahillon J., Delcour J. IS231A insertion specificity: consensus sequence and DNA bending at the target site. Mol Microbiol. 1994 Oct;14(1):131–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Halling S. M., Kleckner N. A symmetrical six-base-pair target site sequence determines Tn10 insertion specificity. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):155–163. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90385-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heierhorst J., Lederis K., Richter D. Presence of a member of the Tc1-like transposon family from nematodes and Drosophila within the vasotocin gene of a primitive vertebrate, the Pacific hagfish Eptatretus stouti. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):6798–6802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.6798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henikoff S. Detection of Caenorhabditis transposon homologs in diverse organisms. New Biol. 1992 Apr;4(4):382–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ikenaga H., Saigo K. Insertion of a movable genetic element, 297, into the T-A-T-A box for the H3 histone gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jul;79(13):4143–4147. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.13.4143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Inouye S., Yuki S., Saigo K. Sequence-specific insertion of the Drosophila transposable genetic element 17.6. 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1Nature. 310(5975):332–333. doi: 10.1038/310332a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Isberg R. R., Syvanen M. DNA gyrase is a host factor required for transposition of Tn5. Cell. 1982 Aug;30(1):9–18. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kelley M. R., Kidd S., Berg R. L., Young M. W. Restriction of P-element insertions at the Notch locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Apr;7(4):1545–1548. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.4.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Korswagen H. C., Durbin R. M., Smits M. T., Plasterk R. H. Transposon Tc1-derived, sequence-tagged sites in Caenorhabditis elegans as markers for gene mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10;93(25):14680–14685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lampe D. J., Churchill M. E., Robertson H. M. A purified mariner transposase is sufficient to mediate transposition in vitro. EMBO J. 1996 Oct 1;15(19):5470–5479. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu L. F., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lodge J. K., Berg D. E. Mutations that affect Tn5 insertion into pBR322: importance of local DNA supercoiling. J Bacteriol. 1990 Oct;172(10):5956–5960. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.10.5956-5960.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lodge J. K., Weston-Hafer K., Berg D. E. Transposon Tn5 target specificity: preference for insertion at G/C pairs. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):645–650. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Marlor R. L., Parkhurst S. M., Corces V. G. The Drosophila melanogaster gypsy transposable element encodes putative gene products homologous to retroviral proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;6(4):1129–1134. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.4.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McKinnon R. D., Waye J. S., Bautista D. S., Graham F. L. Nonrandom insertion of Tn5 into cloned human adenovirus DNA. Gene. 1985;40(1):31–38. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mizuuchi K., Craigie R. Mechanism of bacteriophage mu transposition. Annu Rev Genet. 1986;20:385–429. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.002125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Morgan G. T. Identification in the human genome of mobile elements spread by DNA-mediated transposition. J Mol Biol. 1995 Nov 17;254(1):1–5. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mori I., Benian G. M., Moerman D. G., Waterston R. H. Transposable element Tc1 of Caenorhabditis elegans recognizes specific target sequences for integration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Feb;85(3):861–864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.3.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. O'Hare K., Rubin G. M. Structures of P transposable elements and their sites of insertion and excision in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Cell. 1983 Aug;34(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90133-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Oosumi T., Belknap W. R., Garlick B. Mariner transposons in humans. Nature. 1995 Dec 14;378(6558):672–672. doi: 10.1038/378672a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pryciak P. M., Sil A., Varmus H. E. Retroviral integration into minichromosomes in vitro. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):291–303. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05052.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pryciak P. M., Varmus H. E. Nucleosomes, DNA-binding proteins, and DNA sequence modulate retroviral integration target site selection. Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):769–780. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90289-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Reiter L. T., Murakami T., Koeuth T., Pentao L., Muzny D. M., Gibbs R. A., Lupski J. R. A recombination hotspot responsible for two inherited peripheral neuropathies is located near a mariner transposon-like element. Nat Genet. 1996 Mar;12(3):288–297. doi: 10.1038/ng0396-288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Robertson H. M. The mariner transposable element is widespread in insects. Nature. 1993 Mar 18;362(6417):241–245. doi: 10.1038/362241a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Savilahti H., Rice P. A., Mizuuchi K. The phage Mu transpososome core: DNA requirements for assembly and function. EMBO J. 1995 Oct 2;14(19):4893–4903. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00170.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shibagaki Y., Chow S. A. Central core domain of retroviral integrase is responsible for target site selection. J Biol Chem. 1997 Mar 28;272(13):8361–8369. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.13.8361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sprous D., Harvey S. C. Action at a distance in supercoiled DNA: effects of sequence on slither, branching, and intramolecular concentration. Biophys J. 1996 Apr;70(4):1893–1908. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79754-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tenzen T., Matsutani S., Ohtsubo E. Site-specific transposition of insertion sequence IS630. J Bacteriol. 1990 Jul;172(7):3830–3836. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.7.3830-3836.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tsubota S., Ashburner M., Schedl P. P-element-induced control mutations at the r gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Oct;5(10):2567–2574. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.10.2567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tudor M., Lobocka M., Goodell M., Pettitt J., O'Hare K. The pogo transposable element family of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Mar;232(1):126–134. doi: 10.1007/BF00299145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Vos J. C., De Baere I., Plasterk R. H. Transposase is the only nematode protein required for in vitro transposition of Tc1. Genes Dev. 1996 Mar 15;10(6):755–761. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.6.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wolkow C. A., DeBoy R. T., Craig N. L. Conjugating plasmids are preferred targets for Tn7. Genes Dev. 1996 Sep 1;10(17):2145–2157. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.17.2145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zwaal R. R., Broeks A., van Meurs J., Groenen J. T., Plasterk R. H. Target-selected gene inactivation in Caenorhabditis elegans by using a frozen transposon insertion mutant bank. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 15;90(16):7431–7435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. van Luenen H. G., Colloms S. D., Plasterk R. H. The mechanism of transposition of Tc3 in C. elegans. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):293–301. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90198-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. van Luenen H. G., Plasterk R. H. Target site choice of the related transposable elements Tc1 and Tc3 of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Feb 11;22(3):262–269. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.3.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES