Abstract
Sustainable development is being approached component by component--socioeconomic, sustainable agriculture, transportation, forestry, energy use, cities, and the like--but, leaving a habitable planet for future generations will require the development of a widely shared paradigm. Further, the paradigm should be ecological from a scientific point of view. This development will be facilitated by a discussion of goals and those conditions necessary to meet them. The presently shared paradigm is that economic growth is the cure for all of society's problems, such as poverty, overpopulation, environmental degradation, and the increasing gap between rich and poor. A paradigm shift from growth to sustainability might result either from suffering painful consequences of continuing to follow out-moded paradigms or by discussing what sort of ecosystems will be available to future generations. The purpose of this paper is to help initiate such a discussion.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cairns J., Jr, Bidwell J. R., Arnegard M. E. Toxicity testing with communities: microcosms, mesocosms, and whole-system manipulations. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996;147:45–69. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4058-7_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cairns J., Jr, Bidwell J. R. The modification of human society by natural systems: discontinuities caused by the exploitation of endemic species and the introduction of exotics. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Nov;104(11):1142–1145. doi: 10.1289/ehp.961041142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holdren J. P., Ehrlich P. R. Human population and the global environment. Am Sci. 1974 May-Jun;62(3):282–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Westman W. E. How Much Are Nature's Services Worth? Science. 1977 Sep 2;197(4307):960–964. doi: 10.1126/science.197.4307.960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]