Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Jan;166(1):33–42. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.33

Chl1p, a DNA helicase-like protein in budding yeast, functions in sister-chromatid cohesion.

Robert V Skibbens 1
PMCID: PMC1470669  PMID: 15020404

Abstract

From the time of DNA replication until anaphase onset, sister chromatids remain tightly paired along their length. Ctf7p/Eco1p is essential to establish sister-chromatid pairing during S-phase and associates with DNA replication components. DNA helicases precede the DNA replication fork and thus will first encounter chromatin sites destined for cohesion. In this study, I provide the first evidence that a DNA helicase is required for proper sister-chromatid cohesion. Characterizations of chl1 mutant cells reveal that CHL1 interacts genetically with both CTF7/ECO1 and CTF18/CHL12, two genes that function in sister-chromatid cohesion. Consistent with genetic interactions, Chl1p physically associates with Ctf7p/Eco1p both in vivo and in vitro. Finally, a functional assay reveals that Chl1p is critical for sister-chromatid cohesion. Within the budding yeast genome, Chl1p exhibits the highest degree of sequence similarity to human CHL1 isoforms and BACH1. Previous studies revealed that human CHLR1 exhibits DNA helicase-like activities and that BACH1 is a helicase-like protein that associates with the tumor suppressor BRCA1 to maintain genome integrity. Our findings document a novel role for Chl1p in sister-chromatid cohesion and provide new insights into the possible mechanisms through which DNA helicases may contribute to cancer progression when mutated.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (274.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altschul S. F., Madden T. L., Schäffer A. A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D. J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amann J., Kidd V. J., Lahti J. M. Characterization of putative human homologues of the yeast chromosome transmission fidelity gene, CHL1. J Biol Chem. 1997 Feb 7;272(6):3823–3832. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.6.3823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aris J. P., Blobel G. Identification and characterization of a yeast nucleolar protein that is similar to a rat liver nucleolar protein. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jul;107(1):17–31. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer G. A., Burgers P. M. Molecular cloning, structure and expression of the yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jan 25;18(2):261–265. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.2.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bochar D. A., Wang L., Beniya H., Kinev A., Xue Y., Lane W. S., Wang W., Kashanchi F., Shiekhattar R. BRCA1 is associated with a human SWI/SNF-related complex: linking chromatin remodeling to breast cancer. Cell. 2000 Jul 21;102(2):257–265. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00030-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bogerd A. M., Hoffman J. A., Amberg D. C., Fink G. R., Davis L. I. nup1 mutants exhibit pleiotropic defects in nuclear pore complex function. J Cell Biol. 1994 Oct;127(2):319–332. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.2.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brosh Robert M., Jr, Bohr Vilhelm A. Roles of the Werner syndrome protein in pathways required for maintenance of genome stability. Exp Gerontol. 2002 Apr;37(4):491–506. doi: 10.1016/s0531-5565(01)00227-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cantor S. B., Bell D. W., Ganesan S., Kass E. M., Drapkin R., Grossman S., Wahrer D. C., Sgroi D. C., Lane W. S., Haber D. A. BACH1, a novel helicase-like protein, interacts directly with BRCA1 and contributes to its DNA repair function. Cell. 2001 Apr 6;105(1):149–160. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00304-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ciosk R., Shirayama M., Shevchenko A., Tanaka T., Toth A., Shevchenko A., Nasmyth K. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol Cell. 2000 Feb;5(2):243–254. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80420-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen-Fix O., Peters J. M., Kirschner M. W., Koshland D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev. 1996 Dec 15;10(24):3081–3093. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.24.3081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Deming P. B., Cistulli C. A., Zhao H., Graves P. R., Piwnica-Worms H., Paules R. S., Downes C. S., Kaufmann W. K. The human decatenation checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 2;98(21):12044–12049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221430898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Furuya K., Takahashi K., Yanagida M. Faithful anaphase is ensured by Mis4, a sister chromatid cohesion molecule required in S phase and not destroyed in G1 phase. Genes Dev. 1998 Nov 1;12(21):3408–3418. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.21.3408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guacci V., Koshland D., Strunnikov A. A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1997 Oct 3;91(1):47–57. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)80008-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haber J. E. Bisexual mating behavior in a diploid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence for genetically controlled non-random chromosome loss during vegetative growth. Genetics. 1974 Nov;78(3):843–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.3.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanna J. S., Kroll E. S., Lundblad V., Spencer F. A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol. 2001 May;21(9):3144–3158. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3144-3158.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hartman T., Stead K., Koshland D., Guacci V. Pds5p is an essential chromosomal protein required for both sister chromatid cohesion and condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 2000 Oct 30;151(3):613–626. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.3.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ivanov D., Kwak Y. T., Guo J., Gaynor R. B. Domains in the SPT5 protein that modulate its transcriptional regulatory properties. Mol Cell Biol. 2000 May;20(9):2970–2983. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.9.2970-2983.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kenna Margaret A., Skibbens Robert V. Mechanical link between cohesion establishment and DNA replication: Ctf7p/Eco1p, a cohesion establishment factor, associates with three different replication factor C complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Apr;23(8):2999–3007. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.8.2999-3007.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Koshland D. E., Guacci V. Sister chromatid cohesion: the beginning of a long and beautiful relationship. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000 Jun;12(3):297–301. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00092-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kouprina N., Kroll E., Kirillov A., Bannikov V., Zakharyev V., Larionov V. CHL12, a gene essential for the fidelity of chromosome transmission in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1067–1079. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krause S. A., Loupart M. L., Vass S., Schoenfelder S., Harrison S., Heck M. M. Loss of cell cycle checkpoint control in Drosophila Rfc4 mutants. Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Aug;21(15):5156–5168. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.15.5156-5168.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lamb J. R., Michaud W. A., Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A. Cdc16p, Cdc23p and Cdc27p form a complex essential for mitosis. EMBO J. 1994 Sep 15;13(18):4321–4328. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06752.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li R., Murray A. W. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):519–531. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liras P., McCusker J., Mascioli S., Haber J. E. Characterization of a mutation in yeast causing nonrandom chromosome loss during mitosis. Genetics. 1978 Apr;88(4 Pt 1):651–671. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Longtine M. S., McKenzie A., 3rd, Demarini D. J., Shah N. G., Wach A., Brachat A., Philippsen P., Pringle J. R. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1998 Jul;14(10):953–961. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<953::AID-YEA293>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mayer M. L., Gygi S. P., Aebersold R., Hieter P. Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell. 2001 May;7(5):959–970. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nasmyth K., Peters J. M., Uhlmann F. Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids. Science. 2000 May 26;288(5470):1379–1385. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5470.1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Panizza S., Tanaka T., Hochwagen A., Eisenhaber F., Nasmyth K. Pds5 cooperates with cohesin in maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Curr Biol. 2000 Dec 14;10(24):1557–1564. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00854-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schiestl R. H., Gietz R. D. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr Genet. 1989 Dec;16(5-6):339–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00340712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Scully R., Chen J., Ochs R. L., Keegan K., Hoekstra M., Feunteun J., Livingston D. M. Dynamic changes of BRCA1 subnuclear location and phosphorylation state are initiated by DNA damage. Cell. 1997 Aug 8;90(3):425–435. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80503-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Skibbens R. V., Corson L. B., Koshland D., Hieter P. Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev. 1999 Feb 1;13(3):307–319. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.3.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Spencer F., Gerring S. L., Connelly C., Hieter P. Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1990 Feb;124(2):237–249. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Strunnikov A. V., Larionov V. L., Koshland D. SMC1: an essential yeast gene encoding a putative head-rod-tail protein is required for nuclear division and defines a new ubiquitous protein family. J Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;123(6 Pt 2):1635–1648. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.6.1635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thompson Larry H., Schild David. Recombinational DNA repair and human disease. Mutat Res. 2002 Nov 30;509(1-2):49–78. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00224-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tóth A., Ciosk R., Uhlmann F., Galova M., Schleiffer A., Nasmyth K. Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 1999 Feb 1;13(3):320–333. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.3.320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Venkitaraman Ashok R. Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell. 2002 Jan 25;108(2):171–182. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00615-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang Z., Castaño I. B., De Las Peñas A., Adams C., Christman M. F. Pol kappa: A DNA polymerase required for sister chromatid cohesion. Science. 2000 Aug 4;289(5480):774–779. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5480.774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Weiler K. S., Szeto L., Broach J. R. Mutations affecting donor preference during mating type interconversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1995 Apr;139(4):1495–1510. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.4.1495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES