Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Mar;166(3):1303–1311. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1303

Do quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and intraspecific QTL?

Jennifer M Gleason 1, Michael G Ritchie 1
PMCID: PMC1470780  PMID: 15082549

Abstract

The genetic architecture of traits influencing sexual isolation can give insight into the evolution of reproductive isolation and hence speciation. Here we report a quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of the difference in mean interpulse interval (IPI), an important component of the male courtship song, between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Using a backcross analysis, we find six QTL that explain a total of 40.7% of the phenotypic variance. Three candidate genes are located in the intervals bounded by two of the QTL and there are no significant QTL on the X chromosome. The values of mean IPI for hybrid individuals imply the presence of dominant alleles or epistasis. Because unisexual hybrid sterility prevents an F(2) analysis, we cannot distinguish dominant from additive genetic effects at the scale of QTL. A comparison with a study of QTL for intraspecific variation in D. melanogaster shows that, for these strains, the QTL we have identified for interspecific variation cannot be those that contribute to intraspecific variation. We find that the QTL have bidirectional effects, which indicates that the genetic architecture is compatible with divergence due to genetic drift, although other possibilities are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradshaw H. D., Jr, Otto K. G., Frewen B. E., McKay J. K., Schemske D. W. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):367–382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campesan S., Dubrova Y., Hall J. C., Kyriacou C. P. The nonA gene in Drosophila conveys species-specific behavioral characteristics. Genetics. 2001 Aug;158(4):1535–1543. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.4.1535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Churchill G. A., Doerge R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963–971. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colson I., Goldstein D. B. Evidence for complex mutations at microsatellite loci in Drosophila. Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):617–627. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coyne J. A., Crittenden A. P., Mah K. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science. 1994 Sep 2;265(5177):1461–1464. doi: 10.1126/science.8073292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doi M., Matsuda M., Tomaru M., Matsubayashi H., Oguma Y. A locus for female discrimination behavior causing sexual isolation in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 5;98(12):6714–6719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091421598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fishman Lila, Kelly Alan J., Willis John H. Minor quantitative trait loci underlie floral traits associated with mating system divergence in Mimulus. Evolution. 2002 Nov;56(11):2138–2155. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldstein D. B., Clark A. G. Microsatellite variation in North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Oct 11;23(19):3882–3886. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.19.3882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haag E. S., True J. R. Perspective: From mutants to mechanisms? Assessing the candidate gene paradigm in evolutionary biology. Evolution. 2001 Jun;55(6):1077–1084. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00627.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Henry Charles S., Martínez Wells Marta Lucía, Holsinger Kent E. The inheritance of mating songs in two cryptic, sibling lacewing species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Genetica. 2002 Nov;116(2-3):269–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huttunen Susanna, Vieira Jorge, Hoikkala Anneli. Nucleotide and repeat length variation at the nonA gene of the Drosophila virilis group species and its effects on male courtship song. Genetica. 2002 Jun;115(2):159–167. doi: 10.1023/a:1020102602268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jansen R. C., Stam P. High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1447–1455. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Joly D., Bazin C., Zeng L. W., Singh R. S. Genetic basis of sperm and testis length differences and epistatic effect on hybrid inviability and sperm motility between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Heredity (Edinb) 1997 Apr;78(Pt 4):354–362. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim S. C., Rieseberg L. H. Genetic architecture of species differences in annual sunflowers: implications for adaptive trait introgression. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):965–977. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kopp Artyom, Graze Rita M., Xu Shizhong, Carroll Sean B., Nuzhdin Sergey V. Quantitative trait loci responsible for variation in sexually dimorphic traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2003 Feb;163(2):771–787. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.2.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kulkarni S. J., Steinlauf A. F., Hall J. C. The dissonance mutant of courtship song in Drosophila melanogaster: isolation, behavior and cytogenetics. Genetics. 1988 Feb;118(2):267–285. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.2.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kyriacou C. P., Hall J. C. Circadian rhythm mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect short-term fluctuations in the male's courtship song. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6729–6733. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kyriacou Charalambos P. Single gene mutations in Drosophila: what can they tell us about the evolution of sexual behaviour? Genetica. 2002 Nov;116(2-3):197–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lai C., Lyman R. F., Long A. D., Langley C. H., Mackay T. F. Naturally occurring variation in bristle number and DNA polymorphisms at the scabrous locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 1994 Dec 9;266(5191):1697–1702. doi: 10.1126/science.7992053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lander E. S., Green P., Abrahamson J., Barlow A., Daly M. J., Lincoln S. E., Newberg L. A., Newburg L. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987 Oct;1(2):174–181. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Laurie C. C., True J. R., Liu J., Mercer J. M. An introgression analysis of quantitative trait loci that contribute to a morphological difference between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics. 1997 Feb;145(2):339–348. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Macdonald S. J., Goldstein D. B. A quantitative genetic analysis of male sexual traits distinguishing the sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics. 1999 Dec;153(4):1683–1699. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.4.1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Michalakis Y., Veuille M. Length variation of CAG/CAA trinucleotide repeats in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and its relation to the recombination rate. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1713–1725. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nuzhdin S. V., Reiwitch S. G. Are the same genes responsible for intra- and interspecific variability for sex comb tooth number in Drosophila? Heredity (Edinb) 2000 Jan;84(Pt 1):97–102. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Orr H. A. Testing natural selection vs. genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data. Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):2099–2104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.2099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Panhuis T. M., Butlin R., Zuk M., Tregenza T. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):364–371. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02160-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pugh A. R., Ritchie M. G. Polygenic control of a mating signal in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1996 Oct;77(Pt 4):378–382. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1996.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ritchie M. G., Kyriacou C. P. Reproductive isolation and the period gene of Drosophila. Mol Ecol. 1994 Dec;3(6):595–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ritchie M. G., Yate V. H., Kyriacou C. P. Genetic variability of the interpulse interval of courtship song among some European populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity (Edinb) 1994 May;72(Pt 5):459–464. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ritchie MG, Halsey EJ, Gleason JM. Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song. Anim Behav. 1999 Sep;58(3):649–657. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ritchie MG, Townhill RM, Hoikkala A. Female preference for fly song: playback experiments confirm the targets of sexual selection. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):713–717. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schug M. D., Mackay T. F., Aquadro C. F. Low mutation rates of microsatellite loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet. 1997 Jan;15(1):99–102. doi: 10.1038/ng0197-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schug M. D., Wetterstrand K. A., Gaudette M. S., Lim R. H., Hutter C. M., Aquadro C. F. The distribution and frequency of microsatellite loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Ecol. 1998 Jan;7(1):57–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shaw Kerry L., Parsons Yvonne M. Divergence of mate recognition behavior and its consequences for genetic architectures of speciation. Am Nat. 2002 Mar;159 (Suppl 3):S61–S75. doi: 10.1086/338373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shorey H. H. Nature of the Sound Produced by Drosophila melanogaster during Courtship. Science. 1962 Aug 31;137(3531):677–678. doi: 10.1126/science.137.3531.677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stanewsky R., Fry T. A., Reim I., Saumweber H., Hall J. C. Bioassaying putative RNA-binding motifs in a protein encoded by a gene that influences courtship and visually mediated behavior in Drosophila: in vitro mutagenesis of nonA. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):259–275. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sucena E., Stern D. L. Divergence of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling species caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 25;97(9):4530–4534. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Takahashi A., Tsaur S. C., Coyne J. A., Wu C. I. The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 20;98(7):3920–3925. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061465098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Villella A., Gailey D. A., Berwald B., Ohshima S., Barnes P. T., Hall J. C. Extended reproductive roles of the fruitless gene in Drosophila melanogaster revealed by behavioral analysis of new fru mutants. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1107–1130. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Villella A., Hall J. C. Courtship anomalies caused by doublesex mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):331–344. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Von Schilcher F. The behavior of cacophony, a courtship song mutant in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Biol. 1976 Jun;17(2):187–196. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6773(76)90444-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wheeler D. A., Fields W. L., Hall J. C. Spectral analysis of Drosophila courtship songs: D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and their interspecific hybrid. Behav Genet. 1988 Nov;18(6):675–703. doi: 10.1007/BF01066850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Williams M. A., Blouin A. G., Noor M. A. Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences. Heredity (Edinb) 2001 Jan;86(Pt 1):68–77. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00811.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yamada Hirokazu, Matsuda Muneo, Oguma Yuzuru. Genetics of sexual isolation based on courtship song between two sympatric species: Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa. Genetica. 2002 Nov;116(2-3):225–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yokokura T., Ueda R., Yamamoto D. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of croaker, a new mating behavior mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Jpn J Genet. 1995 Feb;70(1):103–117. doi: 10.1266/jjg.70.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zeng Z. B., Liu J., Stam L. F., Kao C. H., Mercer J. M., Laurie C. C. Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species. Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):299–310. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.1.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zeng Z. B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1457–1468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. von Schilcher F. A mutation which changes courtship song in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1977 May;7(3):251–259. doi: 10.1007/BF01066278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES