Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Mar;166(3):1165–1176. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1165

A dnaC mutation in Escherichia coli that affects copy number of ColE1-like plasmids and the PriA-PriB (but not Rep-PriC) pathway of chromosomal replication restart.

R Harinarayanan 1, J Gowrishankar 1
PMCID: PMC1470795  PMID: 15082538

Abstract

Escherichia coli nusG and rho mutants, which are defective in transcription termination, are killed following transformation with several ColE1-like plasmids that lack the plasmid-encoded copy-number regulator gene rom because of uncontrolled plasmid replication within the cells. In this study, a mutation [dnaC1331(A84T)] in the dnaC gene encoding the replicative helicase-loading protein was characterized as a suppressor of this plasmid-mediated lethality phenotype. The mutation also reduced the copy number of the plasmids in otherwise wild-type strains. In comparison with the isogenic dnaC(+) strain, the dnaC mutant was largely unaffected for (i) growth on rich or minimal medium, (ii) tolerance to UV irradiation, or (iii) survival in the absence of the PriA, RecA, or RecB proteins. However, it was moderately SOS-induced and was absolutely dependent on both the Rep helicase and the PriC protein for its viability. A dnaC1331(A84T) dam mutant, but not its mutH derivative, exhibited sensitivity to growth on rich medium, suggestive of a reduced capacity in the dnaC1331(A84T) strains to survive chromosomal double-strand breaks. We propose that DnaC-A84T is proficient in the assembly of replication forks for both initiation of chromosome replication (at oriC) and replication restart via the Rep-PriC pathway, but that it is specifically defective for replication restart via the PriA-PriB pathway (and consequently also for replication of the Rom(-) ColE1-like plasmids).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (259.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergès H., Oreglia J., Joseph-Liauzun E., Fayet O. Isolation and characterization of a priB mutant of Escherichia coli influencing plasmid copy number of delta rop ColE1-type plasmids. J Bacteriol. 1997 Feb;179(3):956–958. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.3.956-958.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blattner F. R., Plunkett G., 3rd, Bloch C. A., Perna N. T., Burland V., Riley M., Collado-Vides J., Glasner J. D., Rode C. K., Mayhew G. F. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 1997 Sep 5;277(5331):1453–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blue A. Food in its Relation to the Distribution of Wealth. Public Health Pap Rep. 1886;12:145–155. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolivar F., Rodriguez R. L., Greene P. J., Betlach M. C., Heyneker H. L., Boyer H. W., Crosa J. H., Falkow S. Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. II. A multipurpose cloning system. Gene. 1977;2(2):95–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cesareni G., Helmer-Citterich M., Castagnoli L. Control of ColE1 plasmid replication by antisense RNA. Trends Genet. 1991 Jul;7(7):230–235. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90370-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang A. C., Cohen S. N. Construction and characterization of amplifiable multicopy DNA cloning vehicles derived from the P15A cryptic miniplasmid. J Bacteriol. 1978 Jun;134(3):1141–1156. doi: 10.1128/jb.134.3.1141-1156.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Covarrubias L., Bolivar F. Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. VI. Plasmid pBR329, a new derivative of pBR328 lacking the 482-base-pair inverted duplication. Gene. 1982 Jan;17(1):79–89. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90103-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cox M. M., Goodman M. F., Kreuzer K. N., Sherratt D. J., Sandler S. J., Marians K. J. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature. 2000 Mar 2;404(6773):37–41. doi: 10.1038/35003501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cox M. M. Recombinational DNA repair of damaged replication forks in Escherichia coli: questions. Annu Rev Genet. 2001;35:53–82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Flores Maria Jose, Ehrlich S. Dusko, Michel Bénédicte. Primosome assembly requirement for replication restart in the Escherichia coli holDG10 replication mutant. Mol Microbiol. 2002 May;44(3):783–792. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02913.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gowrishankar J. Identification of osmoresponsive genes in Escherichia coli: evidence for participation of potassium and proline transport systems in osmoregulation. J Bacteriol. 1985 Oct;164(1):434–445. doi: 10.1128/jb.164.1.434-445.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gregg Amanda V., McGlynn Peter, Jaktaji Razieh P., Lloyd Robert G. Direct rescue of stalled DNA replication forks via the combined action of PriA and RecG helicase activities. Mol Cell. 2002 Feb;9(2):241–251. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00455-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grompone Gianfranco, Ehrlich S. Dusko, Michel Bénédicte. Replication restart in gyrB Escherichia coli mutants. Mol Microbiol. 2003 May;48(3):845–854. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harinarayanan R., Gowrishankar J. Host factor titration by chromosomal R-loops as a mechanism for runaway plasmid replication in transcription termination-defective mutants of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 2003 Sep 5;332(1):31–46. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00753-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jaktaji Razieh P., Lloyd Robert G. PriA supports two distinct pathways for replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells. Mol Microbiol. 2003 Feb;47(4):1091–1100. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim S., Dallmann H. G., McHenry C. S., Marians K. J. Coupling of a replicative polymerase and helicase: a tau-DnaB interaction mediates rapid replication fork movement. Cell. 1996 Feb 23;84(4):643–650. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81039-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kleckner N., Bender J., Gottesman S. Uses of transposons with emphasis on Tn10. Methods Enzymol. 1991;204:139–180. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)04009-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kohara Y., Akiyama K., Isono K. The physical map of the whole E. coli chromosome: application of a new strategy for rapid analysis and sorting of a large genomic library. Cell. 1987 Jul 31;50(3):495–508. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90503-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuzminov A. Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Dec;63(4):751-813, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.4.751-813.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee E. H., Kornberg A. Replication deficiencies in priA mutants of Escherichia coli lacking the primosomal replication n' protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 15;88(8):3029–3032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lerner C. G., Inouye M. Low copy number plasmids for regulated low-level expression of cloned genes in Escherichia coli with blue/white insert screening capability. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Aug 11;18(15):4631–4631. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.15.4631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin-Chao S., Chen W. T., Wong T. T. High copy number of the pUC plasmid results from a Rom/Rop-suppressible point mutation in RNA II. Mol Microbiol. 1992 Nov;6(22):3385–3393. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb02206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu J., Marians K. J. PriA-directed assembly of a primosome on D loop DNA. J Biol Chem. 1999 Aug 27;274(35):25033–25041. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.35.25033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Maisnier-Patin S., Nordström K., Dasgupta S. Replication arrests during a single round of replication of the Escherichia coli chromosome in the absence of DnaC activity. Mol Microbiol. 2001 Dec;42(5):1371–1382. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Marinus M. G. Recombination is essential for viability of an Escherichia coli dam (DNA adenine methyltransferase) mutant. J Bacteriol. 2000 Jan;182(2):463–468. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.2.463-468.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McGlynn Peter, Lloyd Robert G. Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Nov;3(11):859–870. doi: 10.1038/nrm951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Michel B. Replication fork arrest and DNA recombination. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000 Apr;25(4):173–178. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01560-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miranda Anabel, Kuzminov Andrei. Chromosomal lesion suppression and removal in Escherichia coli via linear DNA degradation. Genetics. 2003 Apr;163(4):1255–1271. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.4.1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nakayama N., Bond M. W., Miyajima A., Kobori J., Arai K. Structure of Escherichia coli dnaC. Identification of a cysteine residue possibly involved in association with dnaB protein. J Biol Chem. 1987 Aug 5;262(22):10475–10480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nichols B. P., Shafiq O., Meiners V. Sequence analysis of Tn10 insertion sites in a collection of Escherichia coli strains used for genetic mapping and strain construction. J Bacteriol. 1998 Dec;180(23):6408–6411. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.23.6408-6411.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nurse P., Zavitz K. H., Marians K. J. Inactivation of the Escherichia coli priA DNA replication protein induces the SOS response. J Bacteriol. 1991 Nov;173(21):6686–6693. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.21.6686-6693.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Radman M., Wagner R. Mismatch repair in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Genet. 1986;20:523–538. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.002515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rangarajan Savithri, Woodgate Roger, Goodman Myron F. Replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli involving pols II, III, V, PriA, RecA and RecFOR proteins. Mol Microbiol. 2002 Feb;43(3):617–628. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Reddy M., Gowrishankar J. Characterization of the uup locus and its role in transposon excisions and tandem repeat deletions in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2000 Apr;182(7):1978–1986. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.7.1978-1986.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. SaiSree L., Reddy M., Gowrishankar J. lon incompatibility associated with mutations causing SOS induction: null uvrD alleles induce an SOS response in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2000 Jun;182(11):3151–3157. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.11.3151-3157.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sandler S. J., Marians K. J. Role of PriA in replication fork reactivation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2000 Jan;182(1):9–13. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.1.9-13.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sandler S. J., Marians K. J., Zavitz K. H., Coutu J., Parent M. A., Clark A. J. dnaC mutations suppress defects in DNA replication- and recombination-associated functions in priB and priC double mutants in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1999 Oct;34(1):91–101. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sandler S. J. Multiple genetic pathways for restarting DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):487–497. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sandler S. J., Samra H. S., Clark A. J. Differential suppression of priA2::kan phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC. Genetics. 1996 May;143(1):5–13. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Seigneur M., Bidnenko V., Ehrlich S. D., Michel B. RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell. 1998 Oct 30;95(3):419–430. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81772-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tougu K., Marians K. J. The interaction between helicase and primase sets the replication fork clock. J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 30;271(35):21398–21405. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.35.21398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang T. C., Smith K. C. Inviability of dam recA and dam recB cells of Escherichia coli is correlated with their inability to repair DNA double-strand breaks produced by mismatch repair. J Bacteriol. 1986 Mar;165(3):1023–1025. doi: 10.1128/jb.165.3.1023-1025.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wechsler J. A. Genetic and phenotypic characterization of dnaC mutations. J Bacteriol. 1975 Feb;121(2):594–599. doi: 10.1128/jb.121.2.594-599.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Xu Liewei, Marians Kenneth J. PriA mediates DNA replication pathway choice at recombination intermediates. Mol Cell. 2003 Mar;11(3):817–826. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00061-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yanisch-Perron C., Vieira J., Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33(1):103–119. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. del Solar G., Giraldo R., Ruiz-Echevarría M. J., Espinosa M., Díaz-Orejas R. Replication and control of circular bacterial plasmids. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Jun;62(2):434–464. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.2.434-464.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES