Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Apr;166(4):1631–1640. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1631

RuvAB and RecG are not essential for the recovery of DNA synthesis following UV-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli.

Janet R Donaldson 1, Charmain T Courcelle 1, Justin Courcelle 1
PMCID: PMC1470822  PMID: 15126385

Abstract

Ultraviolet light induces DNA lesions that block the progression of the replication machinery. Several models speculate that the resumption of replication following disruption by UV-induced DNA damage requires regression of the nascent DNA or migration of the replication machinery away from the blocking lesion to allow repair or bypass of the lesion to occur. Both RuvAB and RecG catalyze branch migration of three- and four-stranded DNA junctions in vitro and are proposed to catalyze fork regression in vivo. To examine this possibility, we characterized the recovery of DNA synthesis in ruvAB and recG mutants. We found that in the absence of either RecG or RuvAB, arrested replication forks are maintained and DNA synthesis is resumed with kinetics that are similar to those in wild-type cells. The data presented here indicate that RecG- or RuvAB-catalyzed fork regression is not essential for DNA synthesis to resume following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage in vivo.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (201.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beam Cynthia E., Saveson Catherine J., Lovett Susan T. Role for radA/sms in recombination intermediate processing in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2002 Dec;184(24):6836–6844. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.24.6836-6844.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolt Edward L., Lloyd Robert G. Substrate specificity of RusA resolvase reveals the DNA structures targeted by RuvAB and RecG in vivo. Mol Cell. 2002 Jul;10(1):187–198. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00560-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chow Kin-Hoe, Courcelle Justin. RecO acts with RecF and RecR to protect and maintain replication forks blocked by UV-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2003 Nov 18;279(5):3492–3496. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311012200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Connolly B., Parsons C. A., Benson F. E., Dunderdale H. J., Sharples G. J., Lloyd R. G., West S. C. Resolution of Holliday junctions in vitro requires the Escherichia coli ruvC gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 15;88(14):6063–6067. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.14.6063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Courcelle J., Carswell-Crumpton C., Hanawalt P. C. recF and recR are required for the resumption of replication at DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 15;94(8):3714–3719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Courcelle J., Crowley D. J., Hanawalt P. C. Recovery of DNA replication in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli requires both excision repair and recF protein function. J Bacteriol. 1999 Feb;181(3):916–922. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.3.916-922.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Courcelle J., Ganesan A. K., Hanawalt P. C. Therefore, what are recombination proteins there for? Bioessays. 2001 May;23(5):463–470. doi: 10.1002/bies.1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Courcelle J., Hanawalt P. C. Participation of recombination proteins in rescue of arrested replication forks in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli need not involve recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(15):8196–8202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121008898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Courcelle J., Hanawalt P. C. RecQ and RecJ process blocked replication forks prior to the resumption of replication in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1999 Oct;262(3):543–551. doi: 10.1007/s004380051116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Courcelle Justin, Donaldson Janet R., Chow Kin-Hoe, Courcelle Charmain T. DNA damage-induced replication fork regression and processing in Escherichia coli. Science. 2003 Jan 23;299(5609):1064–1067. doi: 10.1126/science.1081328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cox M. M., Goodman M. F., Kreuzer K. N., Sherratt D. J., Sandler S. J., Marians K. J. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature. 2000 Mar 2;404(6773):37–41. doi: 10.1038/35003501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cox Michael M. The nonmutagenic repair of broken replication forks via recombination. Mutat Res. 2002 Dec 29;510(1-2):107–120. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00256-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. De Lucia P., Cairns J. Isolation of an E. coli strain with a mutation affecting DNA polymerase. Nature. 1969 Dec 20;224(5225):1164–1166. doi: 10.1038/2241164a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dillingham M. S., Kowalczykowski S. C. A step backward in advancing DNA replication: rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG. Mol Cell. 2001 Oct;8(4):734–736. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00358-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gregg Amanda V., McGlynn Peter, Jaktaji Razieh P., Lloyd Robert G. Direct rescue of stalled DNA replication forks via the combined action of PriA and RecG helicase activities. Mol Cell. 2002 Feb;9(2):241–251. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00455-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hackett P., Jr, Hanawalt P. Selectivity for thymine over 5-bromouracil by a thymine-requiring bacterium. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Aug 17;123(2):356–363. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(66)90288-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanawalt Philip C. Subpathways of nucleotide excision repair and their regulation. Oncogene. 2002 Dec 16;21(58):8949–8956. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hegde S., Sandler S. J., Clark A. J., Madiraju M. V. recO and recR mutations delay induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Jan 20;246(2):254–258. doi: 10.1007/BF00294689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Higgins N. P., Kato K., Strauss B. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol. 1976 Mar 5;101(3):417–425. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90156-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Higuchi Kumiko, Katayama Tsutomu, Iwai Shigenori, Hidaka Masumi, Horiuchi Takashi, Maki Hisaji. Fate of DNA replication fork encountering a single DNA lesion during oriC plasmid DNA replication in vitro. Genes Cells. 2003 May;8(5):437–449. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Howard-Flanders P., Rupp W. D., Wilkins B. M., Cole R. S. DNA replication and recombination after UV irradiation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1968;33:195–207. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1968.033.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Howard-Flanders P., Theriot L., Stedeford J. B. Some properties of excision-defective recombination-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1969 Mar;97(3):1134–1141. doi: 10.1128/jb.97.3.1134-1141.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jaktaji Razieh P., Lloyd Robert G. PriA supports two distinct pathways for replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells. Mol Microbiol. 2003 Feb;47(4):1091–1100. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Khidhir M. A., Casaregola S., Holland I. B. Mechanism of transient inhibition of DNA synthesis in ultraviolet-irradiated E. coli: inhibition is independent of recA whilst recovery requires RecA protein itself and an additional, inducible SOS function. Mol Gen Genet. 1985;199(1):133–140. doi: 10.1007/BF00327522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuzminov A. DNA replication meets genetic exchange: chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(15):8461–8468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151260698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Little J. W. The effect of 5-bromouracil on recombination of phage lambda. Virology. 1976 Jul 15;72(2):530–535. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(76)90184-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lloyd R. G., Benson F. E., Shurvinton C. E. Effect of ruv mutations on recombination and DNA repair in Escherichia coli K12. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;194(1-2):303–309. doi: 10.1007/BF00383532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lombardo M. J., Rosenberg S. M. radC102 of Escherichia coli is an allele of recG. J Bacteriol. 2000 Nov;182(22):6287–6291. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.22.6287-6291.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lusetti Shelley L., Cox Michael M. The bacterial RecA protein and the recombinational DNA repair of stalled replication forks. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001 Nov 9;71:71–100. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.083101.133940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mandal T. N., Mahdi A. A., Sharples G. J., Lloyd R. G. Resolution of Holliday intermediates in recombination and DNA repair: indirect suppression of ruvA, ruvB, and ruvC mutations. J Bacteriol. 1993 Jul;175(14):4325–4334. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.14.4325-4334.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McGlynn P., Lloyd R. G., Marians K. J. Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(15):8235–8240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121007798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McGlynn P., Lloyd R. G. Modulation of RNA polymerase by (p)ppGpp reveals a RecG-dependent mechanism for replication fork progression. Cell. 2000 Mar 31;101(1):35–45. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80621-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McGlynn P., Lloyd R. G. Rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG: simultaneous translocation on the leading and lagging strand templates supports an active DNA unwinding model of fork reversal and Holliday junction formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(15):8227–8234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111008698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McGlynn Peter, Lloyd Robert G. Genome stability and the processing of damaged replication forks by RecG. Trends Genet. 2002 Aug;18(8):413–419. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(02)02720-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Michel B., Ehrlich S. D., Uzest M. DNA double-strand breaks caused by replication arrest. EMBO J. 1997 Jan 15;16(2):430–438. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.2.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Michel B., Flores M. J., Viguera E., Grompone G., Seigneur M., Bidnenko V. Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(15):8181–8188. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111008798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Murphy K. C., Campellone K. G., Poteete A. R. PCR-mediated gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Gene. 2000 Apr 4;246(1-2):321–330. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00071-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Otsuji N., Iyehara H., Hideshima Y. Isolation and characterization of an Escherichia coli ruv mutant which forms nonseptate filaments after low doses of ultraviolet light irradiation. J Bacteriol. 1974 Feb;117(2):337–344. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.2.337-344.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pagès Vincent, Fuchs Robert P. Uncoupling of leading- and lagging-strand DNA replication during lesion bypass in vivo. Science. 2003 May 23;300(5623):1300–1303. doi: 10.1126/science.1083964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Parsons C. A., Tsaneva I., Lloyd R. G., West S. C. Interaction of Escherichia coli RuvA and RuvB proteins with synthetic Holliday junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 15;89(12):5452–5456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Parsons C. A., West S. C. Formation of a RuvAB-Holliday junction complex in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jul 20;232(2):397–405. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Postow L., Ullsperger C., Keller R. W., Bustamante C., Vologodskii A. V., Cozzarelli N. R. Positive torsional strain causes the formation of a four-way junction at replication forks. J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 30;276(4):2790–2796. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006736200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rangarajan Savithri, Woodgate Roger, Goodman Myron F. Replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli involving pols II, III, V, PriA, RecA and RecFOR proteins. Mol Microbiol. 2002 Feb;43(3):617–628. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ryder L., Whitby M. C., Lloyd R. G. Mutation of recF, recJ, recO, recQ, or recR improves Hfr recombination in resolvase-deficient ruv recG strains of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1994 Mar;176(6):1570–1577. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.6.1570-1577.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. SETLOW R. B., SWENSON P. A., CARRIER W. L. THYMINE DIMERS AND INHIBITION OF DNA SYNTHESIS BY ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION OF CELLS. Science. 1963 Dec 13;142(3598):1464–1466. doi: 10.1126/science.142.3598.1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Seigneur M., Bidnenko V., Ehrlich S. D., Michel B. RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell. 1998 Oct 30;95(3):419–430. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81772-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sharples G. J., Benson F. E., Illing G. T., Lloyd R. G. Molecular and functional analysis of the ruv region of Escherichia coli K-12 reveals three genes involved in DNA repair and recombination. Mol Gen Genet. 1990 Apr;221(2):219–226. doi: 10.1007/BF00261724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Storm P. K., Hoekstra W. P., de Haan P. G., Verhoef C. Genetic recombination in Escherichia coli. IV. Isolation and characterization of recombination-deficiency mutants of Escherichia coli K12. Mutat Res. 1971 Sep;13(1):9–17. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(71)90121-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Thoms B., Wackernagel W. Regulatory role of recF in the SOS response of Escherichia coli: impaired induction of SOS genes by UV irradiation and nalidixic acid in a recF mutant. J Bacteriol. 1987 Apr;169(4):1731–1736. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.4.1731-1736.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES