Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Jun;167(2):1001–1015. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.025148

Joint effects of self-fertilization and population structure on mutation load, inbreeding depression and heterosis.

Denis Roze 1, François Rousset 1
PMCID: PMC1470918  PMID: 15238548

Abstract

Both the spatial distribution of organisms and their mode of reproduction have important effects on the change in allele frequencies within populations. In this article, we study the combined effect of population structure and the rate of partial selfing of organisms on the efficiency of selection against recurrent deleterious mutations. Assuming an island model of population structure and weak selection, we express the mutation load, the within- and between-deme inbreeding depression, and heterosis as functions of the frequency of deleterious mutants in the metapopulation; we then use a diffusion model to calculate an expression for the equilibrium probability distribution of this frequency of deleterious mutants. This allows us to derive approximations for the average mutant frequency, mutation load, inbreeding depression, and heterosis, the simplest ones being Equations 35-39 in the text. We find that population structure can help to purge recessive deleterious mutations and reduce the load for some parameter values (in particular when the dominance coefficient of these mutations is <0.2-0.3), but that this effect is reversed when the selfing rate is above a given value. Conversely, within-deme inbreeding depression always decreases, while heterosis always increases, with the degree of population subdivision, for all selfing rates.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (191.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bataillon T., Kirkpatrick M. Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genet Res. 2000 Feb;75(1):75–81. doi: 10.1017/s0016672399004048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caballero A., Hill W. G. Effects of partial inbreeding on fixation rates and variation of mutant genes. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):493–507. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheptou P. O., Mathias A. Can varying inbreeding depression select for intermediary selfing rates? Am Nat. 2001 Apr;157(4):361–373. doi: 10.1086/319320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheptou Pierre-Olivier, Schoen Daniel J. The cost of fluctuating inbreeding depression. Evolution. 2002 May;56(5):1059–1062. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01416.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cherry Joshua L., Wakeley John. A diffusion approximation for selection and drift in a subdivided population. Genetics. 2003 Jan;163(1):421–428. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.1.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Glémin Sylvain, Ronfort Joëlle, Bataillon Thomas. Patterns of inbreeding depression and architecture of the load in subdivided populations. Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2193–2212. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ota T., Cockerham C. C. Detrimental genes with partial selfing and effects on a neutral locus. Genet Res. 1974 Apr;23(2):191–200. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300014816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rousset F. Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure? Heredity (Edinb) 2002 May;88(5):371–380. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roze Denis, Rousset François. Selection and drift in subdivided populations: a straightforward method for deriving diffusion approximations and applications involving dominance, selfing and local extinctions. Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2153–2166. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Theodorou Konstantinos, Couvet Denis. Inbreeding depression and heterosis in a subdivided population: influence of the mating system. Genet Res. 2002 Oct;80(2):107–116. doi: 10.1017/s0016672302005785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vitalis R., Couvet D. Two-locus identity probabilities and identity disequilibrium in a partially selfing subdivided population. Genet Res. 2001 Feb;77(1):67–81. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300004833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wakeley John. Polymorphism and divergence for island-model species. Genetics. 2003 Jan;163(1):411–420. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.1.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weir B. S., Cockerham C. C. Mixed self and random mating at two loci. Genet Res. 1973 Jun;21(3):247–262. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300013446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Whitlock M. C., Ingvarsson P. K., Hatfield T. Local drift load and the heterosis of interconnected populations. Heredity (Edinb) 2000 Apr;84(Pt 4):452–457. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Whitlock Michael C. Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. Genetics. 2003 Jun;164(2):767–779. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.2.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Whitlock Michael C. Selection, load and inbreeding depression in a large metapopulation. Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1191–1202. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES