Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Jul;167(3):1493–1505. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.020016

Epistasis of quantitative trait loci under different gene action models.

Rong-Cai Yang 1
PMCID: PMC1470938  PMID: 15280257

Abstract

Modeling and detecting nonallelic (epistatic) effects at multiple quantitative trait loci (QTL) often assume that the study population is in zygotic equilibrium (i.e., genotypic frequencies at different loci are products of corresponding single-locus genotypic frequencies). However, zygotic associations can arise from physical linkages between different loci or from many evolutionary and demographic processes even for unlinked loci. We describe a new model that partitions the two-locus genotypic values in a zygotic disequilibrium population into equilibrium and residual portions. The residual portion is of course due to the presence of zygotic associations. The equilibrium portion has eight components including epistatic effects that can be defined under three commonly used equilibrium models, Cockerham's model, F2-metric, and F(infinity)-metric models. We evaluate our model along with these equilibrium models theoretically and empirically. While all the equilibrium models require zygotic equilibrium, Cockerham's model is the most general, allowing for Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium and arbitrary gene frequencies at individual loci whereas F2-metric and F(infinity)-metric models require gene frequencies of one-half in a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium population. In an F2 population with two unlinked loci, Cockerham's model is reduced to the F2-metric model and thus both have a desirable property of orthogonality among the genic effects; the genic effects under the F(infinity)-metric model are not orthogonal but they can be easily translated into those under the F2-metric model through a simple relation. Our model is reduced to these equilibrium models in the absence of zygotic associations. The results from our empirical analysis suggest that the residual genetic variance arising from zygotic associations can be substantial and may be an important source of bias in QTL mapping studies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (153.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carlborg O., Andersson L., Kinghorn B. The use of a genetic algorithm for simultaneous mapping of multiple interacting quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 2000 Aug;155(4):2003–2010. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cockerham C C. An Extension of the Concept of Partitioning Hereditary Variance for Analysis of Covariances among Relatives When Epistasis Is Present. Genetics. 1954 Nov;39(6):859–882. doi: 10.1093/genetics/39.6.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cockerham C. C., Tachida H. Permanency of response to selection for quantitative characters in finite populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(5):1563–1565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.5.1563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cockerham C. C., Weir B. S. Descent measures for two loci with some applications. Theor Popul Biol. 1973 Sep;4(3):300–330. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(73)90013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cockerham C. C., Zeng Z. B. Design III with marker loci. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1437–1456. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doebley J., Stec A., Gustus C. teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):333–346. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gallais A. Covariances between arbitrary relatives with linkage and epistasis in the case of linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics. 1974 Sep;30(3):429–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodnight C. J. Quantitative trait loci and gene interaction: the quantitative genetics of metapopulations. Heredity (Edinb) 2000 May;84(Pt 5):587–598. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haley C. S., Knott S. A. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Oct;69(4):315–324. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kao Chen-Hung, Zeng Zhao-Bang. Modeling epistasis of quantitative trait loci using Cockerham's model. Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1243–1261. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.3.1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. VAN DER VEEN J. H. Tests of non-allelic interaction and linkage for quantitative characters in generations derived from two diploid pure lines. Genetica. 1959;30:201–232. doi: 10.1007/BF01535675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wright A. J. Covariance of inbred relatives with special reference to selfing. Genetics. 1987 Mar;115(3):545–552. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.3.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang R. C. Zygotic associations and multilocus statistics in a nonequilibrium diploid population. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1449–1458. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang Rong-Cai. Analysis of multilocus zygotic associations. Genetics. 2002 May;161(1):435–445. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.1.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang Rong-Cai. Gametic and zygotic associations. Genetics. 2003 Sep;165(1):447–452. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.1.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yi Nengjun, Xu Shizhong. Mapping quantitative trait loci with epistatic effects. Genet Res. 2002 Apr;79(2):185–198. doi: 10.1017/s0016672301005511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES