Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Jul;167(3):1425–1443. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.018986

The effects of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a polygenic trait.

Reinhard Bürger 1, Alexander Gimelfarb 1
PMCID: PMC1470964  PMID: 15280253

Abstract

The equilibrium properties of an additive multilocus model of a quantitative trait under frequency- and density-dependent selection are investigated. Two opposing evolutionary forces are assumed to act: (i) stabilizing selection on the trait, which favors genotypes with an intermediate phenotype, and (ii) intraspecific competition mediated by that trait, which favors genotypes whose effect on the trait deviates most from that of the prevailing genotypes. Accordingly, fitnesses of genotypes have a frequency-independent component describing stabilizing selection and a frequency- and density-dependent component modeling competition. We study how the equilibrium structure, in particular, number, degree of polymorphism, and genetic variance of stable equilibria, is affected by the strength of frequency dependence, and what role the number of loci, the amount of recombination, and the demographic parameters play. To this end, we employ a statistical and numerical approach, complemented by analytical results, and explore how the equilibrium properties averaged over a large number of genetic systems with a given number of loci and average amount of recombination depend on the ecological and demographic parameters. We identify two parameter regions with a transitory region in between, in which the equilibrium properties of genetic systems are distinctively different. These regions depend on the strength of frequency dependence relative to pure stabilizing selection and on the demographic parameters, but not on the number of loci or the amount of recombination. We further study the shape of the fitness function observed at equilibrium and the extent to which the dynamics in this model are adaptive, and we present examples of equilibrium distributions of genotypic values under strong frequency dependence. Consequences for the maintenance of genetic variation, the detection of disruptive selection, and models of sympatric speciation are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (284.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Asmussen M. A., Basnayake E. Frequency-dependent selection: the high potential for permanent genetic variation in the diallelic, pairwise interaction model. Genetics. 1990 May;125(1):215–230. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.1.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asmussen M. A. Density-dependent selection incorporating intraspecific competition. II. A diploid model. Genetics. 1983 Feb;103(2):335–350. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bürger R., Gimelfarb A. Genetic variation maintained in multilocus models of additive quantitative traits under stabilizing selection. Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):807–820. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.2.807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bürger Reinhard. Additive genetic variation under intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection: a two-locus study. Theor Popul Biol. 2002 Mar;61(2):197–213. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bürger Reinhard, Gimelfarb Alexander. Fluctuating environments and the role of mutation in maintaining quantitative genetic variation. Genet Res. 2002 Aug;80(1):31–46. doi: 10.1017/s0016672302005682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bürger Reinhard. On a genetic model of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection. Am Nat. 2002 Nov;160(5):661–682. doi: 10.1086/342813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clarke B. C. The evolution of genetic diversity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):453–474. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dieckmann U., Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature. 1999 Jul 22;400(6742):354–357. doi: 10.1038/22521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gavrilets S., Hastings A. Intermittency and transient chaos from simple frequency-dependent selection. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Aug 22;261(1361):233–238. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gavrilets S., Hastings A. Maintenance of genetic variability under strong stabilizing selection: a two-locus model. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):377–386. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gavrilets Sergey. Perspective: models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution. 2003 Oct;57(10):2197–2215. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00233.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kingsolver J. G., Hoekstra H. E., Hoekstra J. M., Berrigan D., Vignieri S. N., Hill C. E., Hoang A., Gibert P., Beerli P. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat. 2001 Mar;157(3):245–261. doi: 10.1086/319193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Loeschcke V., Christiansen F. B. Evolution and intraspecific exploitative competition. II. A two-locus model for additive gene effects. Theor Popul Biol. 1984 Oct;26(2):228–264. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(84)90031-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mani G. S., Clarke B. C., Shelton P. R. A model of quantitative traits under frequency-dependent balancing selection. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990 May 22;240(1297):15–28. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1990.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nagylaki T. Dynamics of density- and frequency-dependent selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):438–441. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nagylaki T. The maintenance of genetic variability in two-locus models of stabilizing selection. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):235–248. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Seger J. Dynamics of some simple host-parasite models with more than two genotypes in each species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988 Jul 6;319(1196):541–555. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1988.0064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Slatkin M. Frequency- and density-dependent selection on a quantitative character. Genetics. 1979 Nov;93(3):755–771. doi: 10.1093/genetics/93.3.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Spencer H. G., Marks R. W. The maintenance of single-locus polymorphism. IV. Models with mutation from existing alleles. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):211–221. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Willensdorfer Martin, Bürger Reinhard. The two-locus model of Gaussian stabilizing selection. Theor Popul Biol. 2003 Aug;64(1):101–117. doi: 10.1016/s0040-5809(03)00049-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang Xu-Sheng, Hill William G. Joint effects of pleiotropic selection and stabilizing selection on the maintenance of quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance. Genetics. 2002 Sep;162(1):459–471. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.1.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES