Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1998 Jan 15;26(2):549–553. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.2.549

Base complementarity in helix 2 of the central pseudoknot in 16S rRNA is essential for ribosome functioning.

R A Poot 1, S H van den Worm 1, C W Pleij 1, J van Duin 1
PMCID: PMC147307  PMID: 9421514

Abstract

Helix 2 of the central pseudoknot structure in Escherichia coli 16S rRNA is formed by a long-distance interaction between nt 17-19 and 918-916, resulting in three base pairs: U17-A918, C18-G917and A19-U916. Previous work has shown that disruption of the central base pair abolishes ribosomal activity. We have mutated the first and last base pairs and tested the mutants for their translational activity in vivo , using a specialized ribosome system. Mutations that disrupt Watson-Crick base pairing result in strongly impaired translational activity. An exception is the mutation U916-->G, creating an A.G pair, which shows almost no decrease in activity. Mutations that maintain base complementarity have little or no impact on translational efficiency. Some of the introduced base pair substitutions substantially alter the stability of helix 2, but this does not influence ribosome functioning, neither at 42 nor at 28 degrees C. Therefore, our results do not support models in which the pseudoknot is periodically disrupted. Rather, the central pseudoknot structure is suggested to function as a permanent structural element necessary for proper organization in the center of the 30S subunit.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (90.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen P. N., Noller H. F. Mutations in ribosomal proteins S4 and S12 influence the higher order structure of 16 S ribosomal RNA. J Mol Biol. 1989 Aug 5;208(3):457–468. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90509-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brimacombe R., Atmadja J., Stiege W., Schüler D. A detailed model of the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA in situ in the 30 S subunit. J Mol Biol. 1988 Jan 5;199(1):115–136. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90383-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brink M. F., Verbeet M. P., de Boer H. A. Formation of the central pseudoknot in 16S rRNA is essential for initiation of translation. EMBO J. 1993 Oct;12(10):3987–3996. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06076.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brink M. F., Verbeet M. P., de Boer H. A. Specialized ribosomes: highly specific translation in vivo of a single targetted mRNA species. Gene. 1995 Apr 24;156(2):215–222. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00030-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Böck A., Petzet A., Piepersberg W. Ribosomal ambiguity (ram) mutations facilitate diyhydrostreptomycin binding to ribosomes. FEBS Lett. 1979 Aug 15;104(2):317–321. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80842-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen E. Y., Seeburg P. H. Supercoil sequencing: a fast and simple method for sequencing plasmid DNA. DNA. 1985 Apr;4(2):165–170. doi: 10.1089/dna.1985.4.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Freier S. M., Kierzek R., Jaeger J. A., Sugimoto N., Caruthers M. H., Neilson T., Turner D. H. Improved free-energy parameters for predictions of RNA duplex stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(24):9373–9377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.24.9373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gutell R. R., Larsen N., Woese C. R. Lessons from an evolving rRNA: 16S and 23S rRNA structures from a comparative perspective. Microbiol Rev. 1994 Mar;58(1):10–26. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.1.10-26.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gutell R. R., Noller H. F., Woese C. R. Higher order structure in ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 1986 May;5(5):1111–1113. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04330.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hui A., de Boer H. A. Specialized ribosome system: preferential translation of a single mRNA species by a subpopulation of mutated ribosomes in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jul;84(14):4762–4766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.14.4762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kunkel T. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):488–492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kössel H., Hoch B., Zeltz P. Alternative base pairing between 5'- and 3'-terminal sequences of small subunit RNA may provide the basis of a conformational switch of the small ribosomal subunit. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jul 25;18(14):4083–4088. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.14.4083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leclerc D., Brakier-Gingras L. A conformational switch involving the 915 region of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA. FEBS Lett. 1991 Feb 25;279(2):171–174. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80141-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lodmell J. S., Dahlberg A. E. A conformational switch in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA during decoding of messenger RNA. Science. 1997 Aug 29;277(5330):1262–1267. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Messing J. New M13 vectors for cloning. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:20–78. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mueller F., Brimacombe R. A new model for the three-dimensional folding of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA. I. Fitting the RNA to a 3D electron microscopic map at 20 A. J Mol Biol. 1997 Aug 29;271(4):524–544. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Neefs J. M., Van de Peer Y., Hendriks L., De Wachter R. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Apr 25;18 (Suppl):2237–2317. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.suppl.2237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pinard R., Payant C., Melançon P., Brakier-Gingras L. The 5' proximal helix of 16S rRNA is involved in the binding of streptomycin to the ribosome. FASEB J. 1993 Jan;7(1):173–176. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.7.1.7678560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pleij C. W., Rietveld K., Bosch L. A new principle of RNA folding based on pseudoknotting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Mar 11;13(5):1717–1731. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.5.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Poot R. A., Brink M. F., Pleij C. W., de Boer H. A., van Duin J. Separation of mutant and wild-type ribosomes based on differences in their anti Shine-Dalgarno sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Nov 25;21(23):5398–5402. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.23.5398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Poot R. A., Jeeninga R. E., Pleij C. W., van Duin J. Acetylation of ribosomal protein S5 affected by defects in the central pseudoknot in 16S ribosomal RNA? FEBS Lett. 1997 Jan 20;401(2-3):175–179. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(96)01467-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Poot R. A., Pleij C. W., van Duin J. The central pseudoknot in 16S ribosomal RNA is needed for ribosome stability but is not essential for 30S initiation complex formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Oct 1;24(19):3670–3676. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.19.3670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Powers T., Noller H. F. A functional pseudoknot in 16S ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 1991 Aug;10(8):2203–2214. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07756.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stern S., Powers T., Changchien L. M., Noller H. F. RNA-protein interactions in 30S ribosomal subunits: folding and function of 16S rRNA. Science. 1989 May 19;244(4906):783–790. doi: 10.1126/science.2658053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Traub W., Sussman J. L. Adenine-guanine base pairing ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Apr 24;10(8):2701–2708. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.8.2701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Van de Peer Y., Van den Broeck I., De Rijk P., De Wachter R. Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Sep;22(17):3488–3494. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.17.3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vila A., Viril-Farley J., Tapprich W. E. Pseudoknot in the central domain of small subunit ribosomal RNA is essential for translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Nov 8;91(23):11148–11152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.23.11148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Woese C. R., Gutell R. R. Evidence for several higher order structural elements in ribosomal RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(9):3119–3122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.9.3119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES