Abstract
A theoretical model of the gramicidin A channel is presented and the kinetic behavior of the model is derived and compared with previous experimental results. The major assumption of the model is that the only interaction between ions in a multiply-occupied channel is electrostatic. The electrostatic calculations indicate in a multiply-occupied channel is electrostatic. The electrostatic calculations indicate that there will be potential wells at each end of the channel and, at high concentrations, that both wells can be occupied. The kinetics are based on two reaction steps: movement of the ion from the bulk solution to the well and movement between the two wells. The kinetics for this reaction rate approach are identical to those based on the Nernst-Planck equation in the limit where the movement between the two wells is rate limiting. The experimental results for sodium and potassium are consistent with a maximum of two ions per channel. To explain the thallium results it is necessary to allow three ions per channel. It is shown that this case is compatible with the electrostatic calculations if the presence of an anion is included. The theoretical kinetics are in reasonable quantitative agreement with the following experimental measurements: single channel conductance of sodium, potassium, and thallium; bi-ionic potential and permeability ratio between sodium-potassium and potassium-thallium; the limiting conductance of potassium and thallium at high applied voltages; current-voltage curves for sodium and potassium at low (but not high) concentrations; and the inhibition of sodium conductance by thallium. The results suggest that the potential well is located close to the channel mouth and that the conductance is partially limited by the rate going from the bulk solution to the well. For thallium, this entrance rate is probably diffusion limited.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chizmadjev Y. A., Aityan S. K. Ion transport across sodium channels in biological membranes. J Theor Biol. 1977 Feb 7;64(3):429–453. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90281-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heckmann K., Lindemann B., Schnakenberg J. Current-voltage curves of porous membranes in the presence of pore-blocking ions. I. Narrow pores containing no more than one moving ion. Biophys J. 1972 Jun;12(6):683–702. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86112-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hille B. Ionic selectivity, saturation, and block in sodium channels. A four-barrier model. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Nov;66(5):535–560. doi: 10.1085/jgp.66.5.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hladky S. B., Haydon D. A. Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. I. Studies of the unit conductance channel. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Aug 9;274(2):294–312. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90178-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levitt D. G. Electrostatic calculations for an ion channel. I. Energy and potential profiles and interactions between ions. Biophys J. 1978 May;22(2):209–219. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85485-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Läuger P. Diffusion-limited ion flow through pores. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Dec 2;455(2):493–509. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90320-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Läuger P. Ion transport through pores: a rate-theory analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Jul 6;311(3):423–441. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90323-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myers V. B., Haydon D. A. Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. II. The ion selectivity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Aug 9;274(2):313–322. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90179-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandblom J., Eisenman G., Neher E. Ionic selectivity, saturation and block in gramicidin A channels: I. Theory for the electrical properties of ion selective channels having two pairs of binding sites and multiple conductance states. J Membr Biol. 1977 Mar 23;31(4):383–347. doi: 10.1007/BF01869414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]