Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1978 Dec;24(3):869–875. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85426-5

Discrete membrane surface charge distributions. Effect of fluctuations near individual channels.

D Attwell, D Eisner
PMCID: PMC1473490  PMID: 737290

Abstract

Each gating mechanism controlling permeability in a membrane may be influenced by only a few charge binding sites on the membrane surface, so that fluctuations in the occupancy of these sites are important. Tow extreme cases arise. (a) The time scale of these fluctuations is much shorter than the gating time constant. Then the gating mechanisms are subject to a rapidly varying electric field. If the gating in the absence of these fluctuations obeys exponential kinetics, so does the gating in the presence of the fluctuations. Changes in surface charge do not simply shift the gating variable curves on the voltage axis, but also change their shape. Such effects are seen experimentally and cannot be explained in terms of conventional surface charge theory. If the activation curve in the absence of any surface charge binding is symmetric about the half-activation point, when some of the surface charge sites are occupied the activation curve is in general asymmetric. (b) The fluctuations occur much more slowly than the gating reaction. There are several pools of channels present with different time constant and activation curves. Again the activation curve is asymmetric about the half-activation point, and its shape is changed by alterations in the surface charge. The kinetics of gating of the whole population of channels are multiexponential.

Full text

PDF
869

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brismar T., Frankenhaeuser B. Effects of ionic concentration on sodium permeability properties of myelinated nerve fibres of Xenopus laevis. J Physiol. 1975 Aug;249(3):549–559. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown R. H., Jr Membrane surface charge: discrete and uniform modelling. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1974;28:341–370. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(74)90021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L., Meves H. The effect of changing the internal solution on sodium inactivation and related phenomena in giant axons. J Physiol. 1965 Oct;180(4):821–836. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiu S. Y. Inactivation of sodium channels: second order kinetics in myelinated nerve. J Physiol. 1977 Dec;273(3):573–596. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cole K. S. Zeta potential and discrete vs. uniform surface charges. Biophys J. 1969 Mar;9(3):465–469. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86397-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ehrenstein G., Gilbert D. L. Evidence for membrane surface from measurement of potassium kinetics as a function of external divalent cation concentration. Biophys J. 1973 May;13(5):495–497. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)86002-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FRANKENHAEUSER B., HODGKIN A. L. The action of calcium on the electrical properties of squid axons. J Physiol. 1957 Jul 11;137(2):218–244. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FRANKENHAEUSER B., HUXLEY A. F. THE ACTION POTENTIAL IN THE MYELINATED NERVE FIBER OF XENOPUS LAEVIS AS COMPUTED ON THE BASIS OF VOLTAGE CLAMP DATA. J Physiol. 1964 Jun;171:302–315. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilbert D. L., Ehrenstein G. Effect of divalent cations on potassium conductance of squid axons: determination of surface charge. Biophys J. 1969 Mar;9(3):447–463. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86396-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):500–544. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hille B. Charges and potentials at the nerve surface. Divalent ions and pH. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Feb;51(2):221–236. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.2.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moore L. E. Effect of temperature and calcium ions on rate constants of myelinated nerve. Am J Physiol. 1971 Jul;221(1):131–137. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1971.221.1.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rojas E., Rudy B. Destruction of the sodium conductance inactivation by a specific protease in perfused nerve fibres from Loligo. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(2):501–531. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shoukimas J. J. Effect of calcium upon sodium inactivation in the giant axon of Loligo pealei. J Membr Biol. 1978 Jan 18;38(3):271–289. doi: 10.1007/BF01871926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vogel W. Calcium and lanthanum effects at the nodal membrane. Pflugers Arch. 1974;350(1):25–39. doi: 10.1007/BF00586736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES