The presence of a prominent notch in the action potential of ventricular epicardium but not endocardium gives rise to a transmural voltage gradient during ventricular activation that manifests as a late delta wave following the QRS or what is commonly referred to as a J wave1 or Osborn wave. The J wave and elevated J point have been described in the ECG of animals and humans for more than five decades, since Osborn's observation in the early 1950s.2 In humans, the appearance of a prominent J wave on the ECG is considered pathognomonic of hypothermia,3-6 hypercalcemia,7,8 or sudden death syndromes, including idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF),9 ischemia/reperfusion-induced VF,10 and the Brugada syndrome.11 A distinct J wave is commonly observed in the ECG of some animal species, including baboons and dogs, under baseline conditions and is greatly amplified under hypothermic conditions.12-14 An elevated J point is commonly encountered in humans and some animal species under normal conditions.
A transmural gradient in the contribution of the transient outward current (Ito) is responsible for the transmural gradient in the magnitude of phase 1 and action potential notch, which in turn inscribes the J-wave or J-point elevation in the ECG.1,15-18
The presence of a prominent Ito-mediated notch predisposes canine ventricular epicardium to all-or-none repolarization and phase 2 reentry. Under pathophysiologic conditions (e.g., ischemia, metabolic inhibition, genetic defects in SCN5A) and with some pharmacologic interventions (e.g., INa or ICa blockers or IK-ATP activators), canine ventricular epicardium exhibits an accentuation of the notch leading to loss of the action potential dome secondary to a rebalancing of currents flowing at the end of phase 1 of the action potential. The dome fails to develop when the outward currents (principally Ito) overwhelm the inward currents (chiefly ICa), resulting in a remarkable (40–70%) abbreviation of the action potential. Loss of the action potential dome is seldom homogeneous. The action potential dome usually is abolished at some epicardial sites but not others, causing a marked dispersion of repolarization within the epicardium. Conduction of the action potential dome from sites at which it is maintained to sites at which it is abolished can cause local reexcitation of the preparation. This mechanism, termed phase 2 reentry, produces closely coupled extrasystolic beats capable of initiating circus movement reentry.19 It is termed phase 2 reentry because phase 2 (dome) of the action potential reenters to reexcite the myocardium.
Electrical heterogeneity has been shown to give rise to phase 2 reentry in canine epicardium exposed to (1) K+ channel openers such as pinacidil20; (2) sodium channel blockers such as flecainide21; (3) combined sodium and calcium channel block, as with terfenadine22; (4) increased [Ca2+]o23; (5) metabolic inhibition15; and (6) ischemic conditions.10,19 Block of Ito restores the action potential dome, thus restoring electrical homogeneity and abolishing reentrant activity in all cases.
Accentuation of the epicardial action potential notch and/or loss of the action potential dome can appear in the ECG as an elevated J point, accentuated J wave, or ST-segment elevation, all manifestations of the pronounced transmural voltage gradient.
In this issue of Heart Rhythm, Thomsen et al24 provide for the first time evidence supporting the hypothesis that a phase 2 reentrant mechanism underlies arrhythmic activity arising from the right ventricle, often the right ventricular outflow tract. The authors demonstrate J-point elevation, ST-segment elevation, and T-wave changes in the sinus beat preceding ventricular extrasystoles and/or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 15 of the 18 patients (83%) studied. Although indirect, the evidence is compatible with phase 2 reentry as the mechanism responsible for ventricular extrasystoles and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in man, a mechanism previously described only in experimental models.
The mean coupling interval of the extrasystoles ranged from 300 to 505 ms, with half of the patients showing relatively long coupling intervals of 400 ms or longer. Although phase 2 reentrant beats are expected to manifest relatively short coupling intervals in the ECG, the initial phase 2 reentry often is buried and therefore concealed in the T wave of the preceding sinus beat.22 Under these conditions, only the second beat (first epicardial or intramural circus movement reentrant beat) is clearly discernible in the ECG, accounting for the longer apparent coupling interval for the phase 2 reentrant beat.22
These characteristics of the J wave and ST segment have been linked to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and the Brugada syndrome.25-28 The Brugada syndrome is characterized by ST-segment elevation (or exaggerated J wave) in the right precordial leads, leads V1 to V3 (unrelated to ischemia, electrolyte abnormalities, or structural heart disease), normal QT interval, and a high incidence of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachycardia or VF.25
In experimental models of the Brugada syndrome, loss of the epicardial action potential dome is caused by an outward shift in the balance of currents active during the early phases of the action potential, principally Ito and ICa. Autonomic neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine facilitate loss of the action potential dome29 by suppressing ICa and/or augmenting potassium current. Beta-adrenergic agonists restore the dome by augmenting ICa. Sodium channel blockers also facilitate loss of the canine right ventricular action potential dome via a negative shift in the voltage at which phase 1 begins.21,30 These findings are consistent with clinical reports of accentuation of ST-segment elevation in patients with Brugada syndrome following vagal maneuvers or administration of class I antiarrhythmic agents and of normalization of the ST-segment elevation following beta-adrenergic agents.1,31 The appearance of ST-segment elevation only in the right precordial leads in Brugada patients is consistent with the finding that loss of the action potential dome is encountered much more commonly in right vs left canine ventricular epicardium.15,32 The Brugada syndrome is a right ventricular disease because Ito density is intrinsically much greater in right vs left ventricular epicardium.33 This observation is consistent with the finding by Thomsen et al that arrhythmic activity associated with J-point or ST-segment elevation generally arises from the right ventricle.
Because a prominent Ito is pivotal to this arrhythmogenic mechanism, agents that inhibit Ito, including quinidine, are effective in restoring the action potential dome, thus restoring electrical homogeneity and aborting all arrhythmic activity in experimental models of the Brugada syndrome34 and in the clinic.35-37 Future studies might be directed at examining the effectiveness of quinidine or more specific Ito blockers, as they become available, on the extrasystolic activity characterized by Thomsen et al as a further test of the hypothesis that phase 2 reentry underlies this activity and as an alternative approach to therapy.
Footnotes
Supported by Grants HL47678 from the National Institutes of Health, American Heart Association, NYS Affiliate, and the Masons of New York State and Florida.
References
- 1.Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the electrocardiographic J wave. Circulation. 1996;93:372–379. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.2.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Osborn JJ. Experimental hypothermia: respiratory and blood pH changes in relation to cardiac function. Am J Physiol. 1953;175:389–398. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1953.175.3.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clements SD, Hurst JW. Diagnostic value of ECG abnormalities observed in subjects accidentally exposed to cold. Am J Cardiol. 1972;29:729–734. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(72)90178-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thompson R, Rich J, Chmelik F, Nelson WL. Evolutionary changes in the electrocardiogram of severe progressive hypothermia. J Electrocardiol. 1977;10:67–70. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(77)80034-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Corbin LV, Scher AM. The canine heart as an electrocardiographic generator. Dependence on cardiac cell orientation. Circ Res. 1977;41:58–67. doi: 10.1161/01.res.41.1.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eagle K. Images in clinical medicine. Osborn waves of hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 1994;10:680. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199403103301005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kraus F. Ueber die wirkung des kalziums auf den kreislauf. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1920;46:201–203. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sridharan MR, Horan LG. Electrocardiographic J wave of hypercalcemia. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:672–673. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90273-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yan GX, Lankipalli RS, Burke JF, Musco S, Kowey PR. Ventricular repolarization components on the electrocardiogram: cellular basis and clinical significance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:401–409. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00713-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yan GX, Joshi A, Guo D, Hlaing T, Martin J, Xu X, Kowey PR. Phase 2 reentry as a trigger to initiate ventricular fibrillation during early acute myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2004;100:1036–1041. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140258.09964.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Antzelevitch C, Brugada P, Brugada J, Brugada R. The Brugada Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside. Blackwell Futura; Oxford: 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hugo N, Dormehl IC, Van Gelder AL. A positive wave at the J-point of electrocardiograms of anaesthetized baboons. J Med Primatol. 1988;17:347–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.West TC, Frederickson EL, Amory DW. Single fiber recording of the ventricular response to induced hypothermia in the anesthetized dog. Correlation with multicellular parameters. Circ Res. 1959;7:880–888. doi: 10.1161/01.res.7.6.880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santos EM, Frederick KC. Electrocardiographic changes in the dog during hypothermia. Am Heart J. 1957;55:415–420. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Antzelevitch C, Sicouri S, Lukas A, Di Diego JM, Nesterenko VV, Liu DW, Roubache JF, Zygmunt AC, Zhang ZQ, Iodice A. Clinical implications of electrical heterogeneity in the heart: the electrophysiology and pharmacology of epicardial, M, and endocardial cells. In: Podrid PJ, Kowey PR, editors. Cardiac Arrhythmia: Mechanism, Diagnosis and Management. William & Wilkins; Baltimore: 1995. pp. 88–107. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Antzelevitch C, Sicouri S, Lukas A, Nesterenko VV, Liu DW, Di Diego JM. Regional differences in the electrophysiology of ventricular cells: physiological and clinical implications. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Second edition WB Saunders; Philadelphia: 1994. pp. 228–245. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Litovsky SH, Antzelevitch C. Transient outward current prominent in canine ventricular epicardium but not endocardium. Circ Res. 1988;62:116–126. doi: 10.1161/01.res.62.1.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu DW, Gintant GA, Antzelevitch C. Ionic bases for electrophysiological distinctions among epicardial, midmyocardial, and endocardial myocytes from the free wall of the canine left ventricle. Circ Res. 1993;72:671–687. doi: 10.1161/01.res.72.3.671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lukas A, Antzelevitch C. Phase 2 reentry as a mechanism of initiation of circus movement reentry in canine epicardium exposed to simulated ischemia. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;32:593–603. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Di Diego JM, Antzelevitch C. Pinacidil-induced electrical heterogeneity and extrasystolic activity in canine ventricular tissues. Does activation of ATP-regulated potassium current promote phase 2 reentry? Circulation. 1993;88:1177–1189. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.3.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krishnan SC, Antzelevitch C. Flecainide-induced arrhythmia in canine ventricular epicardium. Phase 2 reentry? Circulation. 1993;87:562–572. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.2.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fish JM, Antzelevitch C. Role of sodium and calcium channel block in unmasking the Brugada syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1:210–217. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.03.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Di Diego JM, Antzelevitch C. High [Ca2+]-induced electrical heterogeneity and extrasystolic activity in isolated canine ventricular epicardium. Phase 2 reentry. Circulation. 1994;89:1839–1850. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.4.1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thomsen PEB, Joergensen RM, Kanters JK, Jensen JT, Haarbo J, Hagemann A, Vestergaard A, Saermark K. Phase 2 reentry in man. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2:797–803. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brugada P, Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome: a multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1391–1396. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90253-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Aizawa Y, Tamura M, Chinushi M, Naitoh N, Uchiyama H, Kusano Y, Hosono H, Shibata A. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and bradycardia-dependent intraventricular block. Am Heart J. 1993;126:1473–1474. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90550-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Aizawa Y, Tamura M, Chinushi M, Niwano S, Kusano Y, Naitoh N, Shibata A, Tohjoh T, Ueda Y, Joho K. An attempt at electrical catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic area in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Am Heart J. 1992;123:257–260. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90786-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bjerregaard P, Gussak I, Kotar Sl, Gessler JE. Recurrent syncope in a patient with prominent J-wave. Am Heart J. 1994;127:1426–1430. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90070-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Litovsky SH, Antzelevitch C. Differences in the electrophysiological response of canine ventricular subendocardium and subepicardium to acetylcholine and isoproterenol. A direct effect of acetylcholine in ventricular myocardium. Circ Res. 1990;67:615–627. doi: 10.1161/01.res.67.3.615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Krishnan SC, Antzelevitch C. Sodium channel block produces opposite electrophysiological effects in canine ventricular epicardium and endocardium. Circ Res. 1991;69:277–291. doi: 10.1161/01.res.69.2.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Miyazaki T, Mitamura H, Miyoshi S, Soejima K, Aizawa Y, Ogawa S. Autonomic and antiarrhythmic drug modulation of ST segment elevation in patients with Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1061–1070. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00613-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lukas A, Antzelevitch C. Differences in the electrophysiological response of canine ventricular epicardium and endocardium to ischemia: role of the transient outward current. Circulation. 1993;88:2903–2915. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Di Diego JM, Sun ZQ, Antzelevitch C. Ito and action potential notch are smaller in left vs. right canine ventricular epicardium. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H548–H561. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.2.H548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the Brugada syndrome and other mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis associated with ST segment elevation. Circulation;1999;100:1660–1666. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.15.1660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Belhassen B, Glick A, Viskin S. Efficacy of quinidine in high-risk patients with Brugada Syndrome. Circulation. 2004;110:1731–1737. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143159.30585.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Alings M, Dekker L, Sadee A, Wilde A. Quinidine induced electrocardiographic normalization in two patients with Brugada syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24(9 pt 1):1420–1422. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hermida JS, Denjoy I, Clerc J, Extramiana F, Jarry G, Milliez P, Guicheney P, Di Fusco S, Rey JL, Cauchemez B, Leenhardt A. Hydroquinidine therapy in Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1853–1860. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]