Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1987 Dec;76:9–14. doi: 10.1289/ehp.87769

Preferential DNA repair in expressed genes.

P C Hanawalt 1
PMCID: PMC1474462  PMID: 3447906

Abstract

Potentially deleterious alterations to DNA occur nonrandomly within the mammalian genome. These alterations include the adducts produced by many chemical carcinogens, but not the UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, which may be an exception. Recent studies in our laboratory have shown that the excision repair of pyrimidine dimers and certain other lesions is nonrandom in the mammalian genome, exhibiting a distinct preference for actively transcribed DNA sequences. An important consequence of this fact is that mutagenesis and carcinogenesis may be determined in part by the activities of the relevant genes. Repair may also be processive, and a model is proposed in which excision repair is coupled to transcription at the nuclear matrix. Similar but freely diffusing repair complexes may account for the lower overall repair efficiencies in the silent domains of the genome. Risk assessment in relation to chemical carcinogenesis requires assays that determine effective levels of DNA damage for producing malignancy. The existence of nonrandom repair in the genome casts into doubt the reliability of overall indicators of DNA binding and lesion repair for such determinations. Furthermore, some apparent differences between the intragenomic repair heterogeneity in rodent cells and that in human cells mandate a reevaluation of rodent test systems for human risk assessment. Tissue-specific and cell-specific differences in the coordinate regulation of gene expression and DNA repair may account for corresponding differences in the carcinogenic response.

Full text

PDF
9

Images in this article

11FIGURE 1.
on p.11
11FIGURE 1.
on p.11

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arrand J. E., Murray A. M. Benzpyrene groups bind preferentially to the DNA of active chromatin in human lung cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Mar 11;10(5):1547–1555. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.5.1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben-Ishai R., Peleg L. Excision-repair in primary cultures of mouse embryo cells and its decline in progressive passages and established cell lines. Basic Life Sci. 1975;5B:607–610. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2898-8_29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohr V. A., Okumoto D. S., Hanawalt P. C. Survival of UV-irradiated mammalian cells correlates with efficient DNA repair in an essential gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3830–3833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bohr V. A., Okumoto D. S., Ho L., Hanawalt P. C. Characterization of a DNA repair domain containing the dihydrofolate reductase gene in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem. 1986 Dec 15;261(35):16666–16672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bohr V. A., Smith C. A., Okumoto D. S., Hanawalt P. C. DNA repair in an active gene: removal of pyrimidine dimers from the DHFR gene of CHO cells is much more efficient than in the genome overall. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):359–369. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90150-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ciejek E. M., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Actively transcribed genes are associated with the nuclear matrix. Nature. 1983 Dec 8;306(5943):607–609. doi: 10.1038/306607a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elliott G. C., Johnson R. T. DNA repair in mouse embryo fibroblasts. I. Decline in ultraviolet-induced incision rate accompanies cell transformation. J Cell Sci. 1983 Mar;60:267–288. doi: 10.1242/jcs.60.1.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ganesan A. K., Seawell P. C., Lewis R. J., Hanawalt P. C. Processivity of T4 endonuclease V is sensitive to NaCl concentration. Biochemistry. 1986 Sep 23;25(19):5751–5755. doi: 10.1021/bi00367a060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanawalt P. C., Cooper P. K., Ganesan A. K., Smith C. A. DNA repair in bacteria and mammalian cells. Annu Rev Biochem. 1979;48:783–836. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.48.070179.004031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hanawalt P. C. Intragenomic heterogeneity in DNA damage processing: potential implications for risk assessment. Basic Life Sci. 1986;38:489–498. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9462-8_51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harless J., Hewitt R. R. Intranuclear localization of UV-induced DNA repair in human VA13 cells. Mutat Res. 1987 Mar;183(2):177–184. doi: 10.1016/0167-8817(87)90060-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kantor G. J., Setlow R. B. Rate and extent of DNA repair in nondividing human diploid fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 1981 Mar;41(3):819–825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leadon S. A., Hanawalt P. C. Cell-cycle-dependent repair of damage in alpha and bulk DNA of monkey cells. Mutat Res. 1986 Jul;166(1):71–77. doi: 10.1016/0167-8817(86)90042-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lloyd R. S., Hanawalt P. C., Dodson M. L. Processive action of T4 endonuclease V on ultraviolet-irradiated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Nov 11;8(21):5113–5127. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.21.5113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Madhani H. D., Bohr V. A., Hanawalt P. C. Differential DNA repair in transcriptionally active and inactive proto-oncogenes: c-abl and c-mos. Cell. 1986 May 9;45(3):417–423. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90327-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marshall C. J., Vousden K. H., Phillips D. H. Activation of c-Ha-ras-1 proto-oncogene by in vitro modification with a chemical carcinogen, benzo(a)pyrene diol-epoxide. Nature. 1984 Aug 16;310(5978):586–589. doi: 10.1038/310586a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mayne L. V. Inhibitors of DNA synthesis (aphidicolin and araC/HU) prevent the recovery of RNA synthesis after UV-irradiation. Mutat Res. 1984 May-Jun;131(5-6):187–191. doi: 10.1016/0167-8817(84)90023-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mayne L. V., Lehmann A. R. Failure of RNA synthesis to recover after UV irradiation: an early defect in cells from individuals with Cockayne's syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum. Cancer Res. 1982 Apr;42(4):1473–1478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McCready S. J., Cook P. R. Lesions induced in DNA by ultraviolet light are repaired at the nuclear cage. J Cell Sci. 1984 Aug;70:189–196. doi: 10.1242/jcs.70.1.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mellon I., Bohr V. A., Smith C. A., Hanawalt P. C. Preferential DNA repair of an active gene in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(23):8878–8882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.8878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mullenders L. H., van Kesteren A. C., Bussmann C. J., van Zeeland A. A., Natarajan A. T. Preferential repair of nuclear matrix associated DNA in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C. Mutat Res. 1984 Oct;141(2):75–82. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(84)90014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nose K., Nikaido O. Transcriptionally active and inactive genes are similarly modified by chemical carcinogens or X-ray in normal human fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Apr 5;781(3):273–278. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(84)90093-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Phillips D. H., Grover P. L., Sims P. The covalent binding of polycyclic hydrocarbons to DNA in the skin of mice of different strains. Int J Cancer. 1978 Oct 15;22(4):487–494. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910220419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Phillips D. H., Miller J. A., Miller E. C., Adams B. Structures of the DNA adducts formed in mouse liver after administration of the proximate hepatocarcinogen 1'-hydroxyestragole. Cancer Res. 1981 Jan;41(1):176–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Poirier M. C., True B., Laishes B. A. Formation and removal of (guan-8-yl)-DNA-2-acetylaminofluorene adducts in liver and kidney of male rats given dietary 2-acetylaminofluorene. Cancer Res. 1982 Apr;42(4):1317–1321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Robinson S. I., Nelkin B. D., Vogelstein B. The ovalbumin gene is associated with the nuclear matrix of chicken oviduct cells. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):99–106. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90379-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sauerbier W., Hercules K. Gene and transcription unit mapping by radiation effects. Annu Rev Genet. 1978;12:329–363. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.12.120178.001553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Singer B. N-nitroso alkylating agents: formation and persistence of alkyl derivatives in mammalian nucleic acids as contributing factors in carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979 Jun;62(6):1329–1339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith C. A. DNA repair in specific sequences in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1987;6:225–241. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1984.supplement_6.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sukumar S., Notario V., Martin-Zanca D., Barbacid M. Induction of mammary carcinomas in rats by nitroso-methylurea involves malignant activation of H-ras-1 locus by single point mutations. Nature. 1983 Dec 15;306(5944):658–661. doi: 10.1038/306658a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vos J. M., Hanawalt P. C. Processing of psoralen adducts in an active human gene: repair and replication of DNA containing monoadducts and interstrand cross-links. Cell. 1987 Aug 28;50(5):789–799. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90337-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yagi T. DNA repair ability of cultured cells derived from mouse embryos in comparison with human cells. Mutat Res. 1982 Sep;96(1):89–98. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(82)90019-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zarbl H., Sukumar S., Arthur A. V., Martin-Zanca D., Barbacid M. Direct mutagenesis of Ha-ras-1 oncogenes by N-nitroso-N-methylurea during initiation of mammary carcinogenesis in rats. 1985 May 30-Jun 5Nature. 315(6018):382–385. doi: 10.1038/315382a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zolan M. E., Cortopassi G. A., Smith C. A., Hanawalt P. C. Deficient repair of chemical adducts in alpha DNA of monkey cells. Cell. 1982 Mar;28(3):613–619. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90216-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES