Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1987 Jun;72:169–175. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8772169

The antibody response to methyl isocyanate: experimental and clinical findings.

M H Karol, S Taskar, S Gangal, B F Rubanoff, S R Kamat
PMCID: PMC1474631  PMID: 3622432

Abstract

As a result of the industrial accident in Bhopal, India (December 1984) in which thousands of people were exposed to methyl isocyanate (MIC), concern was raised for possible long-term health effects. The well-recognized immunologic consequences of exposure to other industrial isocyanates prompted investigation of an antibody response to MIC. Using procedures which had been developed in this laboratory to evaluate isocyanate immunotoxicity, animal studies were undertaken to develop and test reagents which could be used to detect antibodies to MIC in the exposed population. Guinea pigs were injected with MIC in its reactive isocyanate form. Three weeks later, blood was drawn and serum evaluated using ELISA. To detect antibodies, an antigen was prepared by reaction of MIC with guinea pig serum albumin. Antibodies were detected in each of the four animals injected with MIC. Titers achieved were 1:5120 to 1:10,240. Inhibition assays revealed antibody specificity directed toward the MIC hapten. Analogous antigens prepared by reaction of MIC with human serum albumin were used to evaluate sera from individuals exposed in Bhopal to MIC. Antibodies were detected in 12 of 144 exposed persons. Antibodies were specific for MIC, as evidenced by inhibition assays, and belonged to the IgG, IgM and IgE classes. However, titers were generally low and transient and were found in persons having had the highest MIC exposures. Total IgE values of sera were not significantly different from those of control sera obtained from Bombay residents. The results indicate that exposure to methyl isocyanate resulted in production of specific antibodies. However, the low titers observed and the transient nature of the response suggest little health consequence should result form the antibody response.

Full text

PDF
169

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernstein I. L. Isocyanate-induced pulmonary diseases: a current perspective. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982 Jul;70(1):24–31. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(82)90197-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks S. M. The evaluation of occupational airways disease in the laboratory and workplace. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982 Jul;70(1):56–66. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(82)90202-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown W. E., Green A. H., Cedel T. E., Cairns J. Biochemistry of protein-isocyanate interactions: a comparison of the effects of aryl vs. alkyl isocyanates. Environ Health Perspect. 1987 Jun;72:5–11. doi: 10.1289/ehp.87725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charles J., Bernstein A., Jones B., Jones D. J., Edwards J. H., Seal R. M., Seaton A. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis after exposure to isocyanates. Thorax. 1976 Apr;31(2):127–136. doi: 10.1136/thx.31.2.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Emmett E. A. Allergic contact dermatitis in polyurethane plastic moulders. J Occup Med. 1976 Dec;18(12):802–804. doi: 10.1097/00043764-197612000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Israeli R., Smirnov V., Sculsky M. Vergiftungserscheinungen bei Dicyclohexyl-Methan-4-4'-Diisocyanat-Exposition. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1981;48(2):179–184. doi: 10.1007/BF00378439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kamat S. R., Patel M. H., Kolhatkar V. P., Dave A. A., Mahashur A. A. Sequential respiratory changes in those exposed to the gas leak at Bhopal. Indian J Med Res. 1987;86 (Suppl):20–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karol M. H. Concentration-dependent immunologic response to toluene diisocyanate (TDI) following inhalation exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1983 Apr;68(2):229–241. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(83)90007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karol M. H., Hauth B. A., Riley E. J., Magreni C. M. Dermal contact with toluene diisocyanate (TDI) produces respiratory tract hypersensitivity in guinea pigs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1981 Apr;58(2):221–230. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(81)90426-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karol M. H., Ioset H. H., Riley E. J., Alarie Y. C. Hapten-specific respiratory hypersensitivity in guinea pigs. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1978 Jul;39(7):546–556. doi: 10.1080/0002889778507807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Karol M. H. Respiratory effects of inhaled isocyanates. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1986;16(4):349–379. doi: 10.3109/10408448609037467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karol M. H., Sandberg T., Riley E. J., Alarie Y. Longitudinal study of tolyl-reactive IgE antibodies in workers hypersensitive to TDI. J Occup Med. 1979 May;21(5):354–358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karol M. H., Stadler J., Magreni C. Immunotoxicologic evaluation of the respiratory system: animal models for immediate- and delayed-onset pulmonary hypersensitivity. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1985 Jun;5(3):459–472. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(85)90093-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Karol M. H. Study of guinea pig and human antibodies to toluene diisocyanate. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 Dec;122(6):965–970. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.122.6.965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Karol M. H. Survey of industrial workers for antibodies to toluene diisocyanate. J Occup Med. 1981 Nov;23(11):741–747. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198111000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee H. K., Alarie Y., Karol M. H. Induction of formaldehyde sensitivity in guinea pigs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1984 Aug;75(1):147–155. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(84)90085-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Malo J. L., Zeiss C. R. Occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis after exposure to diphenylmethane diisocyanate. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Jan;125(1):113–116. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.125.1.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ogburn P. L., Jr, Brenner W. E., Dingfelder J. R., Williams P. P., Siegel M. I., Maynard S., Johnson S., Holman R. T. Arachidonic acid's role in the pathology and physiology of pregnancy and labor. Prog Lipid Res. 1981;20:243–246. doi: 10.1016/0163-7827(81)90046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stadler J., Karol M. H. Experimental delayed hypersensitivity following inhalation of dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate: a concentration-response relationship. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1984 Jun 30;74(2):244–249. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(84)90149-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thorne P. S., Hillebrand J. A., Lewis G. R., Karol M. H. Contact sensitivity by diisocyanates: potencies and cross-reactivities. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1987 Jan;87(1):155–165. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(87)90093-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES