Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1998 Apr 15;26(8):1906–1926. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.8.1906

DNA bending: the prevalence of kinkiness and the virtues of normality.

R E Dickerson 1
PMCID: PMC147491  PMID: 9518483

Abstract

DNA bending in 86 complexes with sequence-specific proteins has been examined using normal vector plots, matrices of normal vector angles between all base pairs in the helix, and one-digit roll/slide/twist tables. FREEHELIX, a new program especially designed to analyze severely bent and kinked duplexes, generates the foregoing quantities plus local roll, tilt, twist, slide, shift and rise parameters that are completely free of any assumptions about an overall helix axis. In nearly every case, bending results from positive roll at pyrimidine-purine base pair steps: C-A (= T-G), T-A, or less frequently C-G, in a direction that compresses the major groove. Normal vector plots reveal three well-defined types of bending among the 86 examples: (i) localized kinks produced by positive roll at one or two discrete base pairs steps, (ii) three-dimensional writhe resulting from positive roll at a series of adjacent base pairs steps, or (iii) continuous curvature produced by alternations of positive and negative roll every 5 bp, with side-to-side zig-zag roll at intermediate position. In no case is tilt a significant component of the bending process. In sequences with two localized kinks, such as CAP and IHF, the dihedral angle formed by the three helix segments is a linear function of the number of base pair steps between kinks: dihedral angle = 36 degrees x kink separation. Twenty-eight of the 86 examples can be described as major bends, and significant elements in the recognition of a given base sequence by protein. But even the minor bends play a role in fine-tuning protein/DNA interactions. Sequence-dependent helix deformability is an important component of protein/DNA recognition, alongside the more generally recognized patterns of hydrogen bonding. The combination of FREEHELIX, normal vector plots, full vector angle matrices, and one-digit roll/slide/twist tables affords a rapid and convenient method for assessing bending in DNA.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (849.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aggarwal A. K., Rodgers D. W., Drottar M., Ptashne M., Harrison S. C. Recognition of a DNA operator by the repressor of phage 434: a view at high resolution. Science. 1988 Nov 11;242(4880):899–907. doi: 10.1126/science.3187531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Babcock M. S., Pednault E. P., Olson W. K. Nucleic acid structure analysis: a users guide to a collection of new analysis programs. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1993 Dec;11(3):597–628. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1993.10508018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beamer L. J., Pabo C. O. Refined 1.8 A crystal structure of the lambda repressor-operator complex. J Mol Biol. 1992 Sep 5;227(1):177–196. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90690-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calladine C. R., Drew H. R., McCall M. J. The intrinsic curvature of DNA in solution. J Mol Biol. 1988 May 5;201(1):127–137. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90444-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calladine C. R., Drew H. R. Principles of sequence-dependent flexure of DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986 Dec 20;192(4):907–918. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90036-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure parameters. EMBO J. 1989 Jan;8(1):1–4. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03339.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dickerson R. E. Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure components. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Mar 11;17(5):1797–1803. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.5.1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dickerson R. E. Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure parameters. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989 Feb;6(4):627–634. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1989.10507726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dickerson R. E., Drew H. R. Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer. II. Influence of base sequence on helix structure. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jul 15;149(4):761–786. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90357-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dickerson R. E., Goodsell D. S., Neidle S. "...the tyranny of the lattice...". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 26;91(9):3579–3583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dickerson R. E., Goodsell D., Kopka M. L. MPD and DNA bending in crystals and in solution. J Mol Biol. 1996 Feb 16;256(1):108–125. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodsell D. S., Dickerson R. E. Bending and curvature calculations in B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Dec 11;22(24):5497–5503. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.24.5497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodsell D. S., Kaczor-Grzeskowiak M., Dickerson R. E. The crystal structure of C-C-A-T-T-A-A-T-G-G. Implications for bending of B-DNA at T-A steps. J Mol Biol. 1994 May 27;239(1):79–96. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guzikevich-Guerstein G., Shakked Z. A novel form of the DNA double helix imposed on the TATA-box by the TATA-binding protein. Nat Struct Biol. 1996 Jan;3(1):32–37. doi: 10.1038/nsb0196-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirsch J. A., Aggarwal A. K. Structure of the even-skipped homeodomain complexed to AT-rich DNA: new perspectives on homeodomain specificity. EMBO J. 1995 Dec 15;14(24):6280–6291. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00318.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Juo Z. S., Chiu T. K., Leiberman P. M., Baikalov I., Berk A. J., Dickerson R. E. How proteins recognize the TATA box. J Mol Biol. 1996 Aug 16;261(2):239–254. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim J. L., Nikolov D. B., Burley S. K. Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):520–527. doi: 10.1038/365520a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim Y., Geiger J. H., Hahn S., Sigler P. B. Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):512–520. doi: 10.1038/365512a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kostrewa D., Winkler F. K. Mg2+ binding to the active site of EcoRV endonuclease: a crystallographic study of complexes with substrate and product DNA at 2 A resolution. Biochemistry. 1995 Jan 17;34(2):683–696. doi: 10.1021/bi00002a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lavery R., Sklenar H. The definition of generalized helicoidal parameters and of axis curvature for irregular nucleic acids. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1988 Aug;6(1):63–91. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1988.10506483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lewis M., Chang G., Horton N. C., Kercher M. A., Pace H. C., Schumacher M. A., Brennan R. G., Lu P. Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer. Science. 1996 Mar 1;271(5253):1247–1254. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5253.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li T., Stark M. R., Johnson A. D., Wolberger C. Crystal structure of the MATa1/MAT alpha 2 homeodomain heterodimer bound to DNA. Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):262–269. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lim W. A., Hodel A., Sauer R. T., Richards F. M. The crystal structure of a mutant protein with altered but improved hydrophobic core packing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):423–427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Maroun R. C., Olson W. K. Base sequence effects in double-helical DNA. III. Average properties of curved DNA. Biopolymers. 1988 Apr;27(4):585–603. doi: 10.1002/bip.360270404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mondragón A., Harrison S. C. The phage 434 Cro/OR1 complex at 2.5 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1991 May 20;219(2):321–334. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90568-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nikolov D. B., Chen H., Halay E. D., Hoffman A., Roeder R. G., Burley S. K. Crystal structure of a human TATA box-binding protein/TATA element complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 14;93(10):4862–4867. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.10.4862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Otwinowski Z., Schevitz R. W., Zhang R. G., Lawson C. L., Joachimiak A., Marmorstein R. Q., Luisi B. F., Sigler P. B. Crystal structure of trp repressor/operator complex at atomic resolution. Nature. 1988 Sep 22;335(6188):321–329. doi: 10.1038/335321a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parkinson G., Gunasekera A., Vojtechovsky J., Zhang X., Kunkel T. A., Berman H., Ebright R. H. Aromatic hydrogen bond in sequence-specific protein DNA recognition. Nat Struct Biol. 1996 Oct;3(10):837–841. doi: 10.1038/nsb1096-837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Privé G. G., Yanagi K., Dickerson R. E. Structure of the B-DNA decamer C-C-A-A-C-G-T-T-G-G and comparison with isomorphous decamers C-C-A-A-G-A-T-T-G-G and C-C-A-G-G-C-C-T-G-G. J Mol Biol. 1991 Jan 5;217(1):177–199. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90619-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rice P. A., Yang S., Mizuuchi K., Nash H. A. Crystal structure of an IHF-DNA complex: a protein-induced DNA U-turn. Cell. 1996 Dec 27;87(7):1295–1306. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81824-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rodgers D. W., Harrison S. C. The complex between phage 434 repressor DNA-binding domain and operator site OR3: structural differences between consensus and non-consensus half-sites. Structure. 1993 Dec 15;1(4):227–240. doi: 10.1016/0969-2126(93)90012-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sarai A., Mazur J., Nussinov R., Jernigan R. L. Sequence dependence of DNA conformational flexibility. Biochemistry. 1989 Sep 19;28(19):7842–7849. doi: 10.1021/bi00445a046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schultz S. C., Shields G. C., Steitz T. A. Crystal structure of a CAP-DNA complex: the DNA is bent by 90 degrees. Science. 1991 Aug 30;253(5023):1001–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.1653449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schumacher M. A., Choi K. Y., Zalkin H., Brennan R. G. Crystal structure of LacI member, PurR, bound to DNA: minor groove binding by alpha helices. Science. 1994 Nov 4;266(5186):763–770. doi: 10.1126/science.7973627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shimon L. J., Harrison S. C. The phage 434 OR2/R1-69 complex at 2.5 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1993 Aug 5;232(3):826–838. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ulyanov N. B., Zhurkin V. B. Sequence-dependent anisotropic flexibility of B-DNA. A conformational study. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1984 Oct;2(2):361–385. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1984.10507573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wagner U. G., Werber M. M., Beck Y., Hartman J. R., Frolow F., Sussman J. L. Characterization of crystals of genetically engineered human manganese superoxide dismutase. J Mol Biol. 1989 Apr 20;206(4):787–788. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90586-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Winkler F. K., Banner D. W., Oefner C., Tsernoglou D., Brown R. S., Heathman S. P., Bryan R. K., Martin P. D., Petratos K., Wilson K. S. The crystal structure of EcoRV endonuclease and of its complexes with cognate and non-cognate DNA fragments. EMBO J. 1993 May;12(5):1781–1795. doi: 10.2210/pdb4rve/pdb. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wolberger C., Vershon A. K., Liu B., Johnson A. D., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of a MAT alpha 2 homeodomain-operator complex suggests a general model for homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell. 1991 Nov 1;67(3):517–528. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90526-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yanagi K., Privé G. G., Dickerson R. E. Analysis of local helix geometry in three B-DNA decamers and eight dodecamers. J Mol Biol. 1991 Jan 5;217(1):201–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90620-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang W., Steitz T. A. Crystal structure of the site-specific recombinase gamma delta resolvase complexed with a 34 bp cleavage site. Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):193–207. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90307-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Young M. A., Ravishanker G., Beveridge D. L., Berman H. M. Analysis of local helix bending in crystal structures of DNA oligonucleotides and DNA-protein complexes. Biophys J. 1995 Jun;68(6):2454–2468. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80427-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhurkin V. B., Lysov Y. P., Florentiev V. L., Ivanov V. I. Torsional flexibility of B-DNA as revealed by conformational analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Mar 11;10(5):1811–1830. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.5.1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhurkin V. B., Lysov Y. P., Ivanov V. I. Anisotropic flexibility of DNA and the nucleosomal structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Mar;6(3):1081–1096. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.3.1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhurkin V. B. Sequence-dependent bending of DNA and phasing of nucleosomes. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1985 Feb;2(4):785–804. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1985.10506324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhurkin V. B. Specific alignment of nucleosomes on DNA correlates with periodic distribution of purine-pyrimidine and pyrimidine-purine dimers. FEBS Lett. 1983 Jul 25;158(2):293–297. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80598-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES