Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1974 Dec;9:205–211. doi: 10.1289/ehp.749205

Small animals in the study of pathological effects of asbestos

Paul F Holt
PMCID: PMC1475401  PMID: 4377872

Abstract

The main pathological effects attributed to asbestos are carcinogenesis and fibrogenesis. Statistical studies have shown that asbestos workers may expect a higher morbidity not only from cancer of the lung and mesothelioma but also from cancer at other sites. Carcinomas have been reported in animals following the injection of asbestos, but the production of carcinomas by inhaled asbestos is less easy to demonstrate; most examples of experimental carcinogenesis with asbestos have been produced in rats. Rats and man react differently to asbestos in that rats do not produce asbestos bodies.

The fibrosis that follows inhalation of asbestos has been frequently described, but studies with specific pathogen free animals have shown that, like the fibrosis that may follow the inhalation of silica dust, gross fibrosis involving the production of abnormal amount of collagen probably requires the intervention of infection as well as asbestos.

Because of the difficulties encountered in the direct investigation of carcinogenesis and fibrogenesis resulting from the inhalation of asbestos, attention has been directed to the mechanisms by which the lung is able to protect itself against these fibrous dusts. While non-fibrous dusts and short fibers can be ingested by macrophages and removed via the bronchus, the long fibers that may also reach the alveolar regions may not be removed by this mechanism. The probability that a fiber may reach the alveoli depends largely on the fiber diameter and only to a small extent on the fiber length, so that, for example, fibers 100 μm long may reach the alveoli of a guinea pig. These long fibers may become coated with a ferroprotein derived from hemoglobin to form an asbestos body and, after morphological changes, the asbestos body may be broken up, the fragments ingested by macrophages and dissolved. The lung is thus cleared of asbestos. In the guinea pig lung, consolidated areas from which the asbestos has disappeared shows signs of return to normal.

This clearance mechanism is inhibited by other factors: quartz dust may almost completely inhibit asbestos body formation; tobacco smoke has a considerable effect, and even very heavy loads of carbon may act similarly.

The normal lung appears able to efficiently eliminate small loads of both nonfibrous and fibrous dust, including the carcinogenic asbestos fibers. The capacity is not unlimited, however, and when the load is heavy there is a much greater probability that fibers will not be detoxicated. In addition, other factors such as silica dust and tobacco smoke may remove the protective mechanism in the lungs.

Full text

PDF
205

Images in this article

206FIGURE 1.
on p.206
208FIGURE 2.
on p.208
208FIGURE 3.
on p.208
209FIGURE 4.
on p.209
210FIGURE 5.
on p.210

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BYERS P. D., KING E. J. Experimental infective pneumoconiosis with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (var. muris) and haematite by inhalation and by injection. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1961 Jan;81:123–134. doi: 10.1002/path.1700810115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck E. G., Holt P. F., Nasrallah E. T. Effects of chrysotile and acid-treated chrysotile on macrophage cultures. Br J Ind Med. 1971 Apr;28(2):179–185. doi: 10.1136/oem.28.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Botham S. K., Holt P. F. Development of asbestos bodies on amosite, chrysotile and crocidolite fibres in guinea-pig lungs. J Pathol. 1971 Nov;105(3):159–167. doi: 10.1002/path.1711050303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Botham S. K., Holt P. F. The mechanism of formation of asbestos bodies. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1968 Oct;96(2):443–453. doi: 10.1002/path.1700960223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DUTRA F. R., CARNEY J. D. ASBESTOSIS AND PULMONARY CARCINOMA. Arch Environ Health. 1965 Mar;10:416–423. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1965.10664022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dale K. A method for inducing unilateral silicosis in rabbits by an injection technique with some observations on lung clearance and quantitative evaluation of experimental silicosis. Scand J Respir Dis. 1973;54(3):157–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans J. C., Evans R. J., Holmes A., Hounam R. F., Jones D. M., Morgan A., Walsh M. Studies on the deposition of inhaled fibrous material in the respiratory tract of the rat and its subsequent clearance using radioactive tracer techniques. 1. UICC crocidolite asbestos. Environ Res. 1973 Jun;6(2):180–201. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(73)90032-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gross P., Harley R. A., Jr, DeTreville R. T. Pulmonary reaction to metallic aluminum powders: an experimental study. Arch Environ Health. 1973 May;26(5):227–236. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1973.10666264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HOLT P. F., MILLS J., YOUNG D. K. THE EARLY EFFECTS OF CHRYSOTILE ASBESTOS DUST ON THE RAT LUNG. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1964 Jan;87:15–23. doi: 10.1002/path.1700870103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heppleston A. G., Wright N. A., Stewart J. A. Experimental alveolar lipo-proteinosis following the inhalation of silica. J Pathol. 1970 Aug;101(4):293–307. doi: 10.1002/path.1711010402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holt P. F., Mills J., Young D. K. Experimental asbestosis in the guinea-pig. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1966 Jul;92(1):185–195. doi: 10.1002/path.1700920119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KING E. J., SIVALINGAM S., TREVELLA W. INFECTIVE PNEUMOCONIOSIS. VARIABLE COAL WITH CONSTANT TUBERCULOSIS. Arch Environ Health. 1963 Jul;7:33–46. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1963.10663492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. NORVIIT L. PRIMAERTUBERKULOS, ANDRA LUNGINFEKTIONER OCH BCG SOM BIDRAGANDE FAKTORER VID UPPKOMST AV SILIKOS. Nord Hyg Tidskr. 1964;45:17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pontefract R. D., Cunningham H. M. Letter: Penetration of asbestos through the digestive tract of rats. Nature. 1973 Jun 8;243(5406):352–353. doi: 10.1038/243352a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wagner J. C., Berry G. Mesotheliomas in rats following inoculation with asbestos. Br J Cancer. 1969 Sep;23(3):567–581. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1969.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wagner J. C., Berry G., Skidmore J. W., Timbrell V. The effects of the inhalation of asbestos in rats. Br J Cancer. 1974 Mar;29(3):252–269. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1974.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES