Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1998 Jun 1;26(11):2526–2535. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.11.2526

Unique translational positioning of nucleosomes on synthetic DNAs.

D J Fitzgerald 1, J N Anderson 1
PMCID: PMC147625  PMID: 9592133

Abstract

A computational study was previously carried out to analyze DNA sequences that are known to position histone octamers at single translational sites. A conserved pattern of intrinsic DNA curvature was uncovered that was proposed to direct the formation of nucleosomes to unique positions. The pattern consists of two regions of curved DNA separated by preferred lengths of non-curved DNA. In the present study, 11 synthetic DNAs were constructed which contain two regions of curved DNA of the form [(A5.T5)(G/C)5]4 separated by non-curved regions of variable length. Translational mapping experiments of in vitro reconstituted mononucleosomes using exonuclease III, micrococcal nuclease and restriction enzymes demonstrated that two of the fragments positioned nucleosomes at a single site while the remaining fragments positioned octamers at multiple sites spaced at 10 base intervals. The synthetic molecules that positioned nucleosomes at a single site contain non-curved central regions of the same lengths that were seen in natural nucleosome positioning sequences. Hydroxyl radical and DNase I digests of the synthetic DNAs in reconstituted nucleosomes showed that the synthetic curved element on one side of the nucleosomal dyad assumed a rotational orientation where narrow minor grooves of the A-tracts faced the histone surface with all molecules. In contrast, the curved element on the other side of the nucleosome displayed variable rotational orientations between molecules which appeared to be related to the positioning effect. These results suggest that asymmetry between the two halves of nucleosomal DNA may facilitate translational positioning.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (529.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. N. Detection, sequence patterns and function of unusual DNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Nov 11;14(21):8513–8533. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.21.8513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burkhoff A. M., Tullius T. D. The unusual conformation adopted by the adenine tracts in kinetoplast DNA. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):935–943. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90702-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chao M. V., Gralla J., Martinson H. G. DNA sequence directs placement of histone cores on restriction fragments during nucleosome formation. Biochemistry. 1979 Mar 20;18(6):1068–1074. doi: 10.1021/bi00573a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Costanzo G., Di Mauro E., Salina G., Negri R. Attraction, phasing and neighbour effects of histone octamers on curved DNA. J Mol Biol. 1990 Nov 20;216(2):363–374. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80327-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dong F., Hansen J. C., van Holde K. E. DNA and protein determinants of nucleosome positioning on sea urchin 5S rRNA gene sequences in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Aug;87(15):5724–5728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drak J., Crothers D. M. Helical repeat and chirality effects on DNA gel electrophoretic mobility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 15;88(8):3074–3078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Drew H. R. Can one measure the free energy of binding of the histone octamer to different DNA sequences by salt-dependent reconstitution? J Mol Biol. 1991 Jun 5;219(3):391–392. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90179-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drew H. R., Travers A. A. DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol. 1985 Dec 20;186(4):773–790. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90396-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fitzgerald D. J., Dryden G. L., Bronson E. C., Williams J. S., Anderson J. N. Conserved patterns of bending in satellite and nucleosome positioning DNA. J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 19;269(33):21303–21314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gale J. M., Nissen K. A., Smerdon M. J. UV-induced formation of pyrimidine dimers in nucleosome core DNA is strongly modulated with a period of 10.3 bases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(19):6644–6648. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamiche A., Carot V., Alilat M., De Lucia F., O'Donohue M. F., Revet B., Prunell A. Interaction of the histone (H3-H4)2 tetramer of the nucleosome with positively supercoiled DNA minicircles: Potential flipping of the protein from a left- to a right-handed superhelical form. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 23;93(15):7588–7593. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayes J. J., Bashkin J., Tullius T. D., Wolffe A. P. The histone core exerts a dominant constraint on the structure of DNA in a nucleosome. Biochemistry. 1991 Aug 27;30(34):8434–8440. doi: 10.1021/bi00098a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayes J. J., Tullius T. D., Wolffe A. P. The structure of DNA in a nucleosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(19):7405–7409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hörz W., Altenburger W. Sequence specific cleavage of DNA by micrococcal nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jun 25;9(12):2643–2658. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.12.2643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hörz W., Igo-Kemenes T., Pfeiffer W., Zachau H. G. Specific cleavage of chromatin by restriction nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976 Nov;3(11):3213–3226. doi: 10.1093/nar/3.11.3213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ioshikhes I., Bolshoy A., Derenshteyn K., Borodovsky M., Trifonov E. N. Nucleosome DNA sequence pattern revealed by multiple alignment of experimentally mapped sequences. J Mol Biol. 1996 Sep 20;262(2):129–139. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ioshikhes I., Trifonov E. N. Nucleosomal DNA sequence database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Oct 25;21(21):4857–4859. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.21.4857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kralovics R., Fajkus J., Kovarík A., Bezdek M. DNA curvature of the tobacco GRS repetitive sequence family and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1995 Apr;12(5):1103–1119. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1995.10508800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Levene S. D., Zimm B. H. Understanding the anomalous electrophoresis of bent DNA molecules: a reptation model. Science. 1989 Jul 28;245(4916):396–399. doi: 10.1126/science.2756426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Linxweiler W., Hörz W. Reconstitution of mononucleosomes: characterization of distinct particles that differ in the position of the histone core. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Dec 21;12(24):9395–9413. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.24.9395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Linxweiler W., Hörz W. Reconstitution of mononucleosomes: characterization of distinct particles that differ in the position of the histone core. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Dec 21;12(24):9395–9413. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.24.9395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Linxweiler W., Hörz W. Sequence specificity of exonuclease III from E. coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Aug 25;10(16):4845–4859. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.16.4845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Luger K., Mäder A. W., Richmond R. K., Sargent D. F., Richmond T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 1997 Sep 18;389(6648):251–260. doi: 10.1038/38444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lutter L. C. Precise location of DNase I cutting sites in the nucleosome core determined by high resolution gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Jan;6(1):41–56. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):499–560. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Neubauer B., Linxweiler W., Hörz W. DNA engineering shows that nucleosome phasing on the African green monkey alpha-satellite is the result of multiple additive histone-DNA interactions. J Mol Biol. 1986 Aug 20;190(4):639–645. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90249-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Patterton H. G., Simpson R. T. Modified curved DNA that could allow local DNA underwinding at the nucleosomal pseudodyad fails to position a nucleosome in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Oct 25;23(20):4170–4179. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.20.4170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pennings S., Muyldermans S., Meersseman G., Wyns L. Formation, stability and core histone positioning of nucleosomes reassembled on bent and other nucleosome-derived DNA. J Mol Biol. 1989 May 5;207(1):183–192. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90449-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pruss D., Bushman F. D., Wolffe A. P. Human immunodeficiency virus integrase directs integration to sites of severe DNA distortion within the nucleosome core. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 21;91(13):5913–5917. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.13.5913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Puhl H. L., Behe M. J. Structure of nucleosomal DNA at high salt concentration as probed by hydroxyl radical. J Mol Biol. 1993 Feb 20;229(4):827–832. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ramsay N., Felsenfeld G., Rushton B. M., McGhee J. D. A 145-base pair DNA sequence that positions itself precisely and asymmetrically on the nucleosome core. EMBO J. 1984 Nov;3(11):2605–2611. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02181.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Riley D., Weintraub H. Nucleosomal DNA is digested to repeats of 10 bases by exonuclease III. Cell. 1978 Feb;13(2):281–293. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90197-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Roberts M. S., Fragoso G., Hager G. L. Nucleosomes reconstituted in vitro on mouse mammary tumor virus B region DNA occupy multiple translational and rotational frames. Biochemistry. 1995 Sep 26;34(38):12470–12480. doi: 10.1021/bi00038a046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Satchwell S. C., Drew H. R., Travers A. A. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986 Oct 20;191(4):659–675. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90452-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Satchwell S. C., Travers A. A. Asymmetry and polarity of nucleosomes in chicken erythrocyte chromatin. EMBO J. 1989 Jan;8(1):229–238. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03368.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shrader T. E., Crothers D. M. Artificial nucleosome positioning sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(19):7418–7422. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shrader T. E., Crothers D. M. Effects of DNA sequence and histone-histone interactions on nucleosome placement. J Mol Biol. 1990 Nov 5;216(1):69–84. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Simpson R. T., Stafford D. W. Structural features of a phased nucleosome core particle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jan;80(1):51–55. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Thomas G. H., Elgin S. C. Protein/DNA architecture of the DNase I hypersensitive region of the Drosophila hsp26 promoter. EMBO J. 1988 Jul;7(7):2191–2201. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03058.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Trifonov E. N. Sequence-dependent deformational anisotropy of chromatin DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Sep 11;8(17):4041–4053. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.17.4041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tullius T. D., Dombroski B. A., Churchill M. E., Kam L. Hydroxyl radical footprinting: a high-resolution method for mapping protein-DNA contacts. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:537–558. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tullius T. D., Dombroski B. A. Iron(II) EDTA used to measure the helical twist along any DNA molecule. Science. 1985 Nov 8;230(4726):679–681. doi: 10.1126/science.2996145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang Q., Albert F. G., Fitzgerald D. J., Calvo J. M., Anderson J. N. Sequence determinants of DNA bending in the ilvlH promoter and regulatory region of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Dec 25;22(25):5753–5760. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.25.5753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES