Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1998 Aug 1;26(15):3521–3527. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.15.3521

Altering the DNA-binding specificity of Mu transposase in vitro.

S Y Namgoong 1, S Sankaralingam 1, R M Harshey 1
PMCID: PMC147725  PMID: 9671813

Abstract

We describe the isolation of a variant of Mu transposase (MuA protein) which can recognize altered att sites at the ends of Mu DNA. No prior knowledge of the structure of the DNA binding domain or its mode of interaction with att DNA was necessary to obtain this variant. Protein secondary structure programs initially helped target mutations to predicted helical regions within a subdomain of MuA demonstrated to harbor att DNA binding activity. Of the 54 mutant positions examined, only two showed decreased affinity for att DNA, while eight others affected assembly of the Mu transpososome. A variant impaired in DNA binding [MuA(R146V)], and predicted to be in the recognition helix of an HTH motif, was challenged with altered att sites created from degenerate oligonucleotides to select for novel DNA binding specificity. DNA sequences bound to MuA(R146V) were detected by gel-retardation, and following several steps of PCR amplification/enrichment, were identified by cloning and sequencing. The strategy allowed recovery of an altered att site for which MuA(R146V) showed higher affinity than for the wild-type site, although this site was bound by wild-type MuA as well. The altered association between MuA(R146V) and an altered att site target was competent in transposition. We discuss the strengths and limitations of this methodology, which has applications in dissecting the functional role of specific protein-DNA associations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (273.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alberts B. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell. 1998 Feb 6;92(3):291–294. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80922-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldaz H., Schuster E., Baker T. A. The interwoven architecture of the Mu transposase couples DNA synapsis to catalysis. Cell. 1996 Apr 19;85(2):257–269. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81102-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker T. A., Mizuuchi K. DNA-promoted assembly of the active tetramer of the Mu transposase. Genes Dev. 1992 Nov;6(11):2221–2232. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker T. A., Mizuuchi M., Savilahti H., Mizuuchi K. Division of labor among monomers within the Mu transposase tetramer. Cell. 1993 Aug 27;74(4):723–733. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90519-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bukau B., Horwich A. L. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell. 1998 Feb 6;92(3):351–366. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80928-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chaconas G., Lavoie B. D., Watson M. A. DNA transposition: jumping gene machine, some assembly required. Curr Biol. 1996 Jul 1;6(7):817–820. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00603-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clubb R. T., Schumacher S., Mizuuchi K., Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. Solution structure of the I gamma subdomain of the Mu end DNA-binding domain of phage Mu transposase. J Mol Biol. 1997 Oct 17;273(1):19–25. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Craigie R., Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):387–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ding Z. M., Harshey R. M., Hurley L. H. (+)-CC-1065 as a structural probe of Mu transposase-induced bending of DNA: overcoming limitations of hydroxyl-radical footprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Sep 11;21(18):4281–4287. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.18.4281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ebright R. H., Cossart P., Gicquel-Sanzey B., Beckwith J. Molecular basis of DNA sequence recognition by the catabolite gene activator protein: detailed inferences from three mutations that alter DNA sequence specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(23):7274–7278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.23.7274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ebright R. H. Identification of amino acid-base pair contacts by genetic methods. Methods Enzymol. 1991;208:620–640. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)08032-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ebright R. H., Kolb A., Buc H., Kunkel T. A., Krakow J. S., Beckwith J. Role of glutamic acid-181 in DNA-sequence recognition by the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) of Escherichia coli: altered DNA-sequence-recognition properties of [Val181]CAP and [Leu181]CAP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6083–6087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fried M. G. Measurement of protein-DNA interaction parameters by electrophoresis mobility shift assay. Electrophoresis. 1989 May-Jun;10(5-6):366–376. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150100515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geourjon C., Deléage G. SOPM: a self-optimized method for protein secondary structure prediction. Protein Eng. 1994 Feb;7(2):157–164. doi: 10.1093/protein/7.2.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Geourjon C., Deléage G. SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments. Comput Appl Biosci. 1995 Dec;11(6):681–684. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/11.6.681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hagerman P. J. Sequence-directed curvature of DNA. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:755–781. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.003543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harshey R. M., Getzoff E. D., Baldwin D. L., Miller J. L., Chaconas G. Primary structure of phage mu transposase: homology to mu repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Nov;82(22):7676–7680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.22.7676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim K., Harshey R. M. Mutational analysis of the att DNA-binding domain of phage Mu transposase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Oct 11;23(19):3937–3943. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.19.3937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim K., Namgoong S. Y., Jayaram M., Harshey R. M. Step-arrest mutants of phage Mu transposase. Implications in DNA-protein assembly, Mu end cleavage, and strand transfer. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 20;270(3):1472–1479. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.3.1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuo C. F., Zou A. H., Jayaram M., Getzoff E., Harshey R. DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1585–1591. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07679.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lavoie B. D., Chan B. S., Allison R. G., Chaconas G. Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):3051–3059. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07856.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee J., Jayaram M. A tetramer of the Flp recombinase silences the trimers within it during resolution of a Holliday junction substrate. Genes Dev. 1997 Sep 15;11(18):2438–2447. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.18.2438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee J., Whang I., Jayaram M. Assembly and orientation of Flp recombinase active sites on two-, three- and four-armed DNA substrates: implications for a recombination mechanism. J Mol Biol. 1996 Apr 5;257(3):532–549. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leung P. C., Teplow D. B., Harshey R. M. Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer. Nature. 1989 Apr 20;338(6217):656–658. doi: 10.1038/338656a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):399–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nakayama C., Teplow D. B., Harshey R. M. Structural domains in phage Mu transposase: identification of the site-specific DNA-binding domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):1809–1813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Namgoong S. Y., Harshey R. M. The same two monomers within a MuA tetramer provide the DDE domains for the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition. EMBO J. 1998 Jul 1;17(13):3775–3785. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.13.3775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Namgoong S. Y., Jayaram M., Kim K., Harshey R. M. DNA-protein cooperativity in the assembly and stabilization of mu strand transfer complex. Relevance of DNA phasing and att site cleavage. J Mol Biol. 1994 May 13;238(4):514–527. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Namgoong S. Y., Kim K., Saxena P., Yang J. Y., Jayaram M., Giedroc D. P., Harshey R. M. Mutational analysis of domain II beta of bacteriophage Mu transposase: domains II alpha and II beta belong to different catalytic complementation groups. J Mol Biol. 1998 Jan 16;275(2):221–232. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rebar E. J., Greisman H. A., Pabo C. O. Phage display methods for selecting zinc finger proteins with novel DNA-binding specificities. Methods Enzymol. 1996;267:129–149. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)67010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sarkar G., Sommer S. S. The "megaprimer" method of site-directed mutagenesis. Biotechniques. 1990 Apr;8(4):404–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Savilahti H., Mizuuchi K. Mu transpositional recombination: donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer in trans by the Mu transposase. Cell. 1996 Apr 19;85(2):271–280. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Savilahti H., Rice P. A., Mizuuchi K. The phage Mu transpososome core: DNA requirements for assembly and function. EMBO J. 1995 Oct 2;14(19):4893–4903. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00170.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schumacher S., Clubb R. T., Cai M., Mizuuchi K., Clore G. M., Gronenborn A. M. Solution structure of the Mu end DNA-binding ibeta subdomain of phage Mu transposase: modular DNA recognition by two tethered domains. EMBO J. 1997 Dec 15;16(24):7532–7541. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.24.7532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Surette M. G., Buch S. J., Chaconas G. Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):253–262. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90566-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang J. Y., Jayaram M., Harshey R. M. Enhancer-independent variants of phage Mu transposase: enhancer-specific stimulation of catalytic activity by a partner transposase. Genes Dev. 1995 Oct 15;9(20):2545–2555. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.20.2545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang J. Y., Jayaram M., Harshey R. M. Positional information within the Mu transposase tetramer: catalytic contributions of individual monomers. Cell. 1996 May 3;85(3):447–455. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81122-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yang J. Y., Kim K., Jayaram M., Harshey R. M. A domain sharing model for active site assembly within the Mu A tetramer during transposition: the enhancer may specify domain contributions. EMBO J. 1995 May 15;14(10):2374–2384. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07232.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zou A. H., Leung P. C., Harshey R. M. Transposase contacts with mu DNA ends. J Biol Chem. 1991 Oct 25;266(30):20476–20482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES