Abstract
Cdc42p, a Rho family GTPase of the Ras superfamily, is a key regulator of cell polarity and morphogenesis in eukaryotes. Using 37 site-directed cdc42 mutants, we explored the functions and interactions of Cdc42p in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cytological and genetic analyses of these cdc42 mutants revealed novel and diverse phenotypes, showing that Cdc42p possesses at least two distinct essential functions and acts as a nodal point of cell polarity regulation in vivo. In addition, mapping the functional data for each cdc42 mutation onto a structural model of the protein revealed as functionally important a surface of Cdc42p that is distinct from the canonical protein-interacting domains (switch I, switch II, and the C terminus) identified previously in members of the Ras superfamily. This region overlaps with a region (α5-helix) recently predicted by structural models to be a specificity determinant for Cdc42p-protein interactions.
INTRODUCTION
Cdc42p is a member of the Rho family of the Ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins and is highly conserved in sequence and function across eukaryotic species (reviewed by Johnson, 1999). In mammalian cells, Cdc42p is implicated in transcriptional activation, translational control, and, via rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton, cell morphogenesis (reviewed by Mackay and Hall, 1998; Zohn et al., 1998; Johnson, 1999). In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in which CDC42 was first discovered, Cdc42p is essential for the establishment of cell polarity necessary for bud growth (Adams et al., 1990; Johnson and Pringle, 1990; Johnson, 1999).
Cdc42p acts as a regulatory switch in signal transduction, cycling between an active GTP-bound state and an inactive GDP-bound state. Posttranslational C-terminal geranylgeranylation allows Cdc42p to associate with the plasma membrane, where it binds multiple downstream targets or effectors via a structural loop (switch I) (Johnson, 1999). As with other proteins in the Ras superfamily, the switch I and switch II regions of Cdc42p “switch” conformation upon replacement of bound GDP with GTP, changing the accessibility of these regions to interacting (i.e., effector) proteins (Feltham et al., 1997). Although some effectors of Cdc42p thus far appear to be species specific, many Cdc42p effectors such as WASP, IQGAP, the formins, and the PAK kinases are conserved across species (Johnson, 1999). Considering the number of interactions Cdc42p makes with effector and regulatory proteins in both yeast and more complex organisms, it may be more accurate to think of Cdc42p as a signal transduction switchboard, rather than a simple “on-off” switch with one effector target. In this case, the switchboard forms multiple, distinct signaling complexes to link spatial and temporal cues within the cell to a variety of signaling pathways.
Modeling Cdc42p as a switchboard or nodal point of signal transduction, however, raises a twofold problem of specificity. First, Cdc42p must interact with specific effector targets in a temporally and spatially regulated manner. Second, to elicit specific cellular responses, molecular interactions of effector proteins with Cdc42p must be favored over interactions with other Rho family members. Specificity in these interactions could arise from a regulated spatial or temporal insulation of Cdc42p, its regulatory proteins, and/or its effectors. Alternatively, specificity may be an intrinsic property of Cdc42p. Consistent with this possibility, in vitro and in vivo studies of Rho proteins show that specific residues within switch I are required for specific cellular processes (Lamarche et al., 1996; Joneson and Bar-Sagi, 1998; Sahai et al., 1998; Zohar et al., 1998). However, variation in switch I sequences cannot account fully for specificity. For example, in S. cerevisiae, there are six Rho family proteins: Cdc42p and Rho1p–Rho5p (Garcia-Ranea and Valencia, 1998). Almost all of these proteins are known to be involved in distinct functions required for budding (Cabib et al., 1998; Madden and Snyder, 1998; Schmidt and Hall, 1998). The switch I regions of these proteins are highly conserved and, in the case of Cdc42p and Rho5p, identical. Therefore, it is probable that, as in the Rab family of small GTP-binding proteins (Brennwald and Novick, 1993; Dunn et al., 1993; Stenmark et al., 1994), regions of Cdc42p in addition to switch I confer functional specificity. To study individual Cdc42p functions in vivo and the structure-function relationships that allow the Rho family of small GTP-binding proteins to participate in distinct cellular processes, we created and analyzed a collection of cdc42 alleles in S. cerevisiae.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, Media, and Transformations
cdc42 strains generated by site-directed mutagenesis are described in Table 1. All yeast transformations were performed according to the modified (Schiestl and Gietz, 1989) method of Ito et al. (1983). Other strains are described below and include diploid DDY1102, which was created by mating haploid strains DDY902 (MATa ade2-1 his3Δ200 leu2-3,112 ura3-52) and DDY904 (MATα his3Δ200 leu2-3,112 ura3-52 lys2-801am).
Table 1.
Allelea | Mutation | Growth (YPD)b | Growth (YPD + 3% formamide)c | Restriction sited | DDYe |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC42 | None | Wild type (11–37°C) | Wild type (20–37°C) | 1300 | |
cdc42-1f | Multipleh | Conditional (11–30°C) | Conditional (25°C) | NlaIV (−) | 1302 |
cdc42-101 | K5A | Conditional (11–30°C) | Lethal | NheI | 1304 |
cdc42-102 | D11A | Wild type | Conditional (30°C) | BanI | 1306 |
cdc42-105 | E127A,K128A | Wild type | Wild type | BbvI | 1308 |
cdc42-107 | R131A,R133A,R135A | Wild type | Wild type | HindIII | 1310 |
cdc42-108 | R147A,E148A,K150A | Wild type | Wild type | BsrI | 1312 |
cdc42-109 | E140A | Wild type | Wild type | HhaI | 1314 |
cdc42-110 | R144A | Wild type | Wild type | NheI | 1316 |
cdc42-111 | K16A | Lethal | Lethal | HhaI | 1369 |
cdc42-112 | D31A | Wild type | Wild type | BbvI | 1318 |
cdc42-113 | D38A | Lethal | Lethal | NruI | 1371 |
cdc42-114 | D48A,E49A | Wild type | Wild type | BanI | 1320 |
cdc42-115 | D57A | Lethalg | Lethal | EagI(−) | 1373 |
cdc42-116 | E62A,D63A | Conditional (20–37°C) | Lethal | BbvI | 1322 |
cdc42-117 | D65A,R66A,R68A | Conditional (20–37°C)/slow | Lethal | PvuI(−) | 1324 |
cdc42-118 | D76A | Conditional (11–30°C) | Conditional (25°C) | PstI | 1326 |
cdc42-119 | E100A | Wild type | Conditional (20–30°C) | PvuII | 1328 |
cdc42-120 | E91A,K94A,E95A,K96A | Wild type | Conditional (20–34°C) | PstI | 1330 |
cdc42-121 | D170A,E171A | Wild type | Conditional (20–25°C) | PstI | 1332 |
cdc42-122 | E178A | Wild type | Wild type | HhaI | 1334 |
cdc42-123 | R163A,K166A | Conditional (11–30°C) | Lethal | MscI | 1336 |
cdc42-124 | K183A,K184A,K186A,K187A | Conditional (11–34°C) | Conditional (20–25°C) | BfaI | 1338 |
cdc42-125 | K153A,E156A | Lethal | Lethal | BsiWI | 1383 |
cdc42-126 | Y32K | Conditional (25°C)/slow | Lethal | BanI | 1340 |
cdc42-127 | V33A | Wild type | Wild type | HhaI | 1342 |
cdc42-128 | T35A | Lethal | Lethal | PstI | 1386 |
cdc42-129 | V36T | Conditional (20–34°C) | Lethal | Psp1406I | 1344 |
cdc42-130 | F37Y | Wild type | Wild type | AccI | 1346 |
cdc42-131 | N39A | Wild type | Lethal | SfaNI | 1348 |
cdc42-132 | Y40K | Lethal | Lethal | AlwNI | 1390 |
cdc42-133 | Y40C | Lethal | Lethal | HhaI | 1391 |
cdc42-134 | D118A | Lethal | Lethal | Sau3AI(−) | 1392 |
cdc42-135 | R120A,D121A,D122A,K123A | Lethal | Lethal | SacII | 1393 |
cdc42-136 | R120A | Wild type | Conditional (20–34°C) | BglII | 1350 |
cdc42-137 | D121A | Wild type | Wild type | BsrBI | 1352 |
cdc42-138 | D122A | Wild type | Wild type | SfaNI | 1354 |
cdc42-139 | K123A | Wild type | Wild type | BsaHI | 1356 |
cdc42-140 | H102A,H103A,H104A | Wild type | Conditional (20–34°C) | PstI | 1358 |
a Each allele, except cdc42-1, is linked to LEU2+, as shown in Figure 1C.
b Growth phenotype of haploid cells on YPD plates at 11, 14, 20, 25, 30, 34, and 37°C. The permissive temperature range is indicated in parentheses. Relevant genotype is cdc42∶LEU2+ ura3-52 leu2-3,112 his3Δ200 lys2-801am.
c Growth phenotype of haploid cells on YPD plates containing 3% (v/v) formamide.
d Diagnostic restriction site added during site-directed mutagenesis to mark mutation. (−) denotes loss of the restriction site.
e The DDY strain number is listed for each allele of CDC42 in a MATa ura3-52 leu2-3,112 his3Δ200 lys2-801am strain. The background of each strain is S288C. Isogenic MATα haploids are designated by the next ascending odd strain number (not shown). For recessive lethal cdc42 alleles, the listed strain number is for a diploid strain with the relevant genotype MATa/MATα, cdc42/CDC42, ade2-1/ADE2, ura3-52/ura3-52, leu2-3,112/leu2-3,112, his3Δ200/his3Δ200, lys2-801am/LYS2.
f Allele isolated by Adams et al. (1990). Strain congenic with all other strains in this study, except LEU2+ is at LEU2 and unlinked to cdc42-1.
g Mutation may be dominant lethal. Only one heterozygote recovered.
h See Miller and Johnson (1997).
Unless stated otherwise, yeast strains were cultured with rich (YPD) medium (Sherman et al., 1986) at 25°C. To track the segregation of auxotrophic markers and to selectively maintain plasmids, strains were cultured with complete synthetic (SC) medium (Sherman et al., 1986) lacking the appropriate amino acid(s) (e.g., SC-Leu). To induce sporulation, diploid cells were grown in sporulation medium (Sherman et al., 1986) containing complete amino acids at one-third the concentration used for SC medium.
In Vitro Mutagenesis
To construct a CDC42 template for mutagenesis, S. cerevisiae CDC42 was subcloned from pRB1590 (Ohya et al., 1993), on a BamHI-SalI fragment, into pRS305 (pDDLV29) (Sikorski and Hieter, 1989) to form pKK177. The subcloned fragment was sequenced in both directions and was found to be identical to published sequences (Johnson and Pringle, 1990; Miller and Johnson, 1997), except for a constructed NdeI site (CATATG) at the start codon. Site-directed mutagenesis (Transformer, Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) subsequently introduced a SphI site 10 base pairs 3′ of the stop codon to generate pKK294. A Bsu36I-SphI fragment (Bsu36I blunted with Klenow) was isolated from pKK294 and subcloned into the EcoRI (blunted with Klenow) and SphI sites of pALTER-1 (Promega, Madison, WI), forming pAC2. All subsequent oligonucleotide site-directed mutagenesis was performed on pAC2 with the Altered Sites II in vitro mutagenesis system (Promega). The introduction of each mutation, marked by a diagnostic restriction site (Table 1), was verified by restriction endonuclease digestion.
From the mutagenized pAC2 template, the coding sequence of each cdc42 allele was subcloned as a NdeI-SphI fragment into the integration construct pKK655, replacing the NdeI-SphI fragment bearing the wild-type allele. The D118A mutation was subcloned directly into pKK655 as a Bsu36I-BsrGI fragment from pcdc42-A118 (Ziman et al., 1991). To construct pKK655, LEU2 was removed from the vector sequence of pKK294 by digestion with Tth111I and DraIII, forming pKK415. NotI linkers were then ligated to the blunted ends of a unique NsiI site in pKK415, forming pKK554. LEU2 with NotI ends (underlined) was generated by PCR from a pRS305 template with the use of the primer pair 5′AGTCTCTAGCGGCCGCACCATATCGACTACGTCGTAAG3′ and 5′AGTCTCTAGCGGCCGCATATCGACGGTCGAGGAG3′. This fragment was then cloned into the NotI site of pKK554 to form pKK655, in which the selectable LEU2 marker is linked to CDC42. Integration of LEU2 next to wild-type CDC42 did not perceptively compromise CDC42 function. The relevant BanII-XbaI fragment of pKK655 is diagrammed in Figure 1C. A DNA sequence was obtained for each cdc42 allele subcloned into pKK655 to confirm the accuracy of the mutagenesis.
Construction of cdc42 Strains
Following the strategy of Wertman et al. (1992), LEU2-marked cdc42 alleles were integrated into the S. cerevisiae genome by homologous recombination (Figure 1C), replacing CDC42 and ensuring that each cdc42 allele was expressed at wild-type levels. A recipient strain (DDY1151) hemizygous at CDC42 was constructed by transforming DDY1102 with a BanII-XbaI digest of pKK366. To construct pKK366, HIS3 was subcloned as a blunted ApaLI-DraIII fragment from pRS303 (Sikorski and Hieter, 1989) into the blunted NdeI sites of pKK294. Transformants of DDY1102 were selected on SC-His medium. To identify a recombinant in which one copy of the CDC42 coding sequence was replaced by HIS3, His+ transformants were screened by PCR with the use of primers A (5′CCACCGTCGATTCAAGGG3′) and D (5′GCTGCAAGAACAAAGAGACC3′), which flank the desired integration site (see Figure 1C). To ensure that transformation resulted in the integration of only one HIS3 marker and did not produce any other recessive lethal mutation, hemizygotes were sporulated and the tetrad progeny dissected. For each tetrad, only two His− progeny grew, indicating the disruption of a single essential gene by HIS3. The His+ Leu− recipient strain was then transformed with a BanII-XbaI digest of each pKK655 derivative plasmid containing a different cdc42 allele. Transformants were selected on SC-Leu medium. To identify homologous recombinants in which cdc42::HIS3 was replaced by cdc42::LEU2, Leu+ His− diploids were identified by replica plating Leu+ transformants on SC-His medium. To verify integration of a directed cdc42 mutation linked to the LEU2 marker at the CDC42 locus, Leu+ His− diploids were screened by PCR with the use of primer A and the internal LEU2 primer B (5′GTACCACCGAAGTCGGTGATGCTG3′) (Figure 1C). With the use of the diagnostic restriction site that marks each mutation, restriction endonuclease digestion of the PCR product confirmed the presence of each mutation at the appropriate site. To derive cdc42 haploid strains, two or more heterozygotes from each transformation were sporulated. The progeny of 8–24 tetrads per heterozygote were dissected and scored for growth as well as for the 2:2 segregation of auxotrophic markers. As a final verification of integration, Leu+ haploids were screened by PCR with the use of primer pairs A/B and C (5′CTTGACCAACGTGGTCACC3′)/D. As described above, restriction endonuclease digestion of the PCR product generated with primers A and B confirmed the presence of a site-directed cdc42 mutation.
Phenotypic Analyses
In each analysis for each cdc42 allele, at least two strains derived from independent transformants were examined. To analyze growth, cdc42 strains were plated onto YPD or YPD supplemented with 0.9 M NaCl, 0.9 M KCl, 1.3 M sorbitol, or 3% (vol/vol) formamide (SuperPure grade; Fisher Scientific, Santa Clara, CA). In the case of recessive lethal alleles, diploids were sporulated and the tetrad progeny were dissected onto the plates described above. Plates were incubated at 25, 30, 34, and 37°C for 3 d, at 20°C for 4 d, and at 11 and 14°C for 14 d. YPG (rich medium with 3% glycerol as the sole carbon source) plates were used to test strains for impaired mitochondrial function (Sherman et al., 1986).
To assess cellular morphology, log-phase cultures were examined by phase-contrast microscopy. To determine the terminal morphologies of conditional-lethal strains, log-phase cultures grown at 25°C were divided into two equal aliquots. One aliquot was maintained at 25°C and the other aliquot was shifted to a nonpermissive temperature, 14 or 37°C. At varying times during log-phase growth, aliquots were fixed in 4% formaldehyde. Before microscopic examination, each aliquot was sonicated briefly. For all morphological analyses, 200–300 cells were scored.
Peptide Antibody Production
A peptide corresponding to residues 130–145 of S. cerevisiae Cdc42p (see Figure 3A) was synthesized by Dr. David King (University of California, Berkeley). To cross-link peptide to carrier protein, 4 mg of peptide and 4 mg of rabbit serum albumin (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) were dissolved in 120 μl of 0.2 M triethanolamine-HCl, pH 8.0, in a 0.3-ml Wheaton V-vial (VWR, San Francisco, CA). Three milligrams of dimethyl-suberimidate (Sigma Chemical) were dissolved in 50 μl of the same buffer and added immediately to the peptide/carrier protein solution. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. To remove free peptide and cross-linker, the solution was dialyzed in No. 7 Spectra/Por (MWCO 1000) tubing (VWR) against 2 l of water overnight at 4°C. The dialysate was divided into aliquots and stored frozen at −20°C. The protein concentration of the dialysate was determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with BSA as a standard.
New Zealand White rabbits were injected subcutaneously with 250 μg of peptide-carrier conjugate emulsified with 0.25 ml of Freund's complete adjuvant (Sigma Chemical). Booster injections containing 100 μg of conjugate mixed with Freund's incomplete adjuvant (Sigma Chemical) were administered every 3 wk after the initial injection. Bleeds were collected 2 wk after each boost, starting at wk 8, and screened for immunoreactivity against baculovirus-expressed S. cerevisiae GST-Cdc42p and Cdc42p in yeast whole cell lysates. Immunoreactivity against Cdc42p was first detected in the lysates at wk 17. Exsanguination occurred at wk 26.
To affinity purify the peptide antibody, a peptide column was prepared. Reacti-Gel 6X (Pierce, Rockford, IL) was washed rapidly with 0.1 M borate buffer, pH 8.8, by gentle vacuum filtration. The gel slurry was collected in a microfuge tube, and 150 μl of borate buffer containing 5 mg of peptide was added. The peptide was incubated with the gel for 48 h at room temperature with gentle rocking. To block unreacted functional groups, the gel was washed with 0.1 M Tris-Cl, pH 8.5, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with the same buffer. Tris-Cl was then removed by sequential washes with PBS. A 1-ml column was prepared and washed successively by gravity feed with 15 ml of 6 M guanidine-HCl; 25 ml of 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4 (buffer A); 25 ml of buffer B (buffer A with 4.5 M MgCl2, 1 mg/ml BSA); and 50 ml of buffer A. Fifty milliliters of serum (wk 26) pooled equally from two rabbits was cleared by centrifugation (5 min, 15,000 × g) and recirculated through the column for 10 h at room temperature. The column was then washed successively with 20 ml of buffer A; 40 ml of buffer A plus 1 M guanidine-Cl; and then 20 ml of buffer A. Antibody was eluted with buffer B and collected in 10 1-ml fractions. To assay for antibody in the eluate fractions, 1 μl of each fraction was diluted 1:10 in PBS and spotted onto nitrocellulose, which was then processed as a standard immunoblot. Fractions containing antibody were pooled and dialyzed against 1 l of PBS at room temperature for 3 h, followed by a second dialysis for 12 h at 4°C against 1 l of PBS containing 35% glycerol. The dialysate was divided into aliquots, frozen in N2 (liquid), and stored at −80°C.
Microscopy
For indirect double-label immunofluorescence microscopy, cells were prepared as described by Ayscough and Drubin (1998), except the methanol/acetone permeabilization step was replaced by the addition of 6 μl of 0.05% SDS in PBS to each sample well for exactly 5 min. Affinity-purified rabbit anti-yeast Cdc42 peptide antibody and guinea pig anti-actin antibody (Mulholland et al., 1994) were diluted 1:1300 and 1:2000, respectively, in PBS containing 1 mg/ml BSA. Cells were observed with epifluorescence with a Zeiss (Thornwood, NY) Axiovert microscope equipped with a 100X/1.3 Plan-Neofluar objective. Images were captured with the use of a Sony charge-coupled device camera and Northern Exposure software (Phase 3 Imaging Systems, Philadelphia, PA). For differential interference-contrast images of yeast, 0.5–1 ml of log-phase culture was briefly microfuged and resuspended in 25 μl of glucose-free minimal medium. The cells were examined immediately with a TE300 microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY) equipped with a 100X/1.4 Plan-Apo objective and a 1.4 numerical aperture condenser. Digital images were acquired with a bottom-ported Orca 100 charge-coupled device camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ) and Phase 3 Imaging Systems software. Image processing consisted of background subtraction and spatial filtering with a HiGauss 7 × 7 kernel convolution filter.
Intragenic Complementation Analysis
Each cdc42ts allele in a MATa lys2 strain (see Table 1) was mated for 6 h on YPD plates at 25°C to each cdc42ts allele in a congenic MATα ade2 strain (CDC42, DDY1601; cdc42-1, DDY1602; cdc42-101, DDY1603; cdc42-118, DDY1604; cdc42-123, DDY1605; cdc42-124, DDY1606; cdc42-129, DDY1607). Diploids were selected as single colonies on SC-Lys/Ade plates. Complementation was tested on YPD plates at 25, 30, 34, and 37°C (3 d) and scored positive if (a) a diploid that is heterozygous at the CDC42 locus grew at temperatures that are restrictive for diploids homozygous for that cdc42 allele present in the heterozygote; (b) a reciprocal pairwise cross yielded the same result; and (c) no reversion of the original Ts− phenotype was detected among the haploid progeny of each heterozygote.
Overexpression of Cdc42p Effectors
To determine whether overexpression of different Cdc42p effectors can suppress the growth defects of specific cdc42ts alleles, galactose-inducible effector expression constructs were made. The coding and 3′ genomic sequences of CLA4 (Cvrckováet al., 1995) and SKM1 (Martín et al., 1997) were subcloned as BglII-XbaI fragments from pMJS37 and pMJS30 (both gifts of M. Shulewitz and Dr. J. Thorner, University of California, Berkeley), respectively, into the BamHI and XbaI sites of pRB1438 (pDD42) (a gift of Dr. D. Botstein, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA), a pRS316 (Sikorski and Hieter, 1989) vector containing a GAL1/10 promoter (Johnston and Davis, 1984), forming pGAL-CLA4 (pKK842) and pGAL-SKM1 (pKK848), respectively. pCC1209 and pCC1210 are pRS316-derived plasmids in which the GAL1/10 promoter is fused to GIC1 and GIC2 (Brown et al., 1997; Chen et al., 1997), respectively, and were the gifts of Drs. G. Chen and C. Chan (University of Texas, Austin). pGAL-STE20 was described previously (Peter et al., 1996).
The galactose-inducible overexpression plasmids were transformed into each MATa cdc42ts strain (Table 1). To reduce background variability, each strain was grown from a single colony, prepared for transformation, and divided into individual transformation reactions. Four single colonies were picked from each SC-Ura transformation plate. A single colony derived from each independent transformant was picked and restruck to single colonies on SC-Ura plates and SC-Ura plates containing 2% galactose and 2% raffinose as the sole carbon source. The plates were first incubated at 25°C for 12 h to allow for galactose induction and then were shifted to 37°C for 6 d. Cold-sensitive strains were shifted to 14°C for 14 d, and a set of control plates was maintained at 25°C. To determine if growth at restrictive temperatures was plasmid dependent, the experiment was repeated with cells that were first grown on SC medium containing 0.5 mg/ml 5-FOA (U.S. Biological, Swampscott, MA), which counterselects URA3-marked plasmids (Boeke et al., 1984).
Cell Extracts, SDS-PAGE, and Immunoblots
Yeast whole cell lysates were prepared as described by Belmont and Drubin (1998). A total of 0.15 OD600 units were loaded per lane of a 13% polyacrylamide gel prepared for SDS-PAGE (Laemmli, 1970). The gel was electrotransferred to a BA83 Protran membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH) for 30 min at 60 V and probed as described previously (Kozminski et al., 1993), except that the Tris-buffered saline (TBS) washes included 0.1% (vol/vol) Tween 20 (Sigma Chemical). Affinity-purified rabbit anti-Cdc42 peptide antibody was diluted to 1:500 in TBS + 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) and incubated in the same buffer for 24 h at room temperature. To block the Cdc42 peptide antibody, affinity-purified Cdc42 antibody was diluted 100-fold into 1 ml of TBS and incubated overnight at 4°C with 1 mg of the Cdc42 peptide used as an immunogen. Rabbit anti-yeast β-tubulin antibody 206 (Bond et al., 1986) was diluted 1:20,000 in TBST. HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) was diluted 1:5,000 in TBST and incubated for 45 min at room temperature. The blot was developed by ECL (Amersham). A dilution series of whole cell extract verified signal linearity.
Cdc42p Expression and Purification
To overexpress Cdc42p in yeast, DDY757 (MATa cry1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 ura3-1 trp1-1 can1-100; from A. Sachs, University of California, Berkeley) was transformed with pGAL10-CDC42 (Miller and Johnson, 1994) to make DDY1245. To induce gene expression, log-phase cultures were washed into rich medium containing 2% (wt/vol) raffinose as the sole carbon source. Galactose was added to 2% (wt/vol) 12 h later; incubation then continued for another 8 h at 25°C before the cells were harvested.
To express Cdc42pΔC in Escherichia coli, the coding sequence for residues 1–183 was amplified by PCR from a pKK294 template. The fragment was subcloned into the NcoI (blunted with Mung Bean nuclease) and HindIII polylinker sites of pBAT4 (Peränen et al., 1996), forming pKK703, and sequenced for accuracy. BL21(DE3) cells were transformed, induced, and lysed as described by Lappalainen et al. (1997). Because the expressed protein was insoluble, inclusion bodies were isolated from cell lysates by centrifugation at 21,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 0.2 mM PMSF, 0.5% [vol/vol] Triton X-100), incubated on ice for 30 min, and pelleted again. Inclusion body pellets were stored at −20°C.
Baculovirus-expressed GST-Cdc42p (Zheng et al., 1994) was enriched from infected Sf9 cells with the use of glutathione-agarose beads (Sigma Chemical), as described by Ausubel et al. (1994).
RESULTS
Directed Mutagenesis of CDC42 Yields a Collection of Mutants with Diverse Phenotypes
Site-directed mutagenesis of CDC42 was used to generate mutants defective in different Cdc42p-protein interactions. One set of mutations was made in the switch I region of Cdc42p (residues 32–40; Figure 1A, Table 1). Residues Y32, T35, V36, F37, and Y40 in switch I were mutated individually to amino acids that elicit a mutant phenotype when introduced into the same sequence position of Ras or Rho (Sigal et al., 1986; Adari et al., 1988; Calés et al., 1988; Self et al., 1993; Nonaka et al., 1995). For switch I residues V33, D38, and N39, no previous data suggested a substitute residue. Thus, alanine replaced the target residue, removing the potentially interactive side chain. Because the switch I region is highly conserved among the six Rho proteins in S. cerevisiae (Figure 1B) and because no structural model existed for any Rho family member at the inception of this study, a second set of mutations was made by “alanine scanning mutagenesis” (e.g., Wertman et al., 1992). Clustered charged residues have the highest probability of protein surface exposure and intermolecular contact (Chothia, 1976); therefore, in a sliding window of approximately six amino acids along the length of Cdc42p, groups of one to four charged residues were replaced with alanine (Figure 1A). In total, 37 cdc42 alleles were created by site-directed mutagenesis.
Multiple heterozygous diploids (cdc42/CDC42) were recovered for each of the 37 site-directed cdc42 alleles (Table 1), except for cdc42-115D57A, which, consistent with a previous report (Stowers et al., 1995), strongly suggests that D57A is a dominant-negative mutation. Although none of the heterozygous recombinants displayed growth defects on rich medium, two heterozygous recombinants (cdc42-116E62A,D63A/CDC42 and cdc42-117D65A,R66A,R68A/CDC42) displayed elongate cell morphologies as a dominant phenotype.
To identify recessive growth phenotypes, the haploid progeny of each heterozygote were examined for growth on various media (Table 1). Nine of the 37 cdc42 alleles conferred haploid lethality, and 8 alleles conferred temperature-conditional lethality on rich medium. Two of 8 temperature-conditional strains (cdc42-117D65A,R66A,R68A and cdc42-126Y32K) exhibited slow growth even at 25°C. cdc42 haploid strains were also screened for sensitivity to formamide, a membrane-permeant and metabolically inert molecule known to weaken protein-protein interactions by destabilizing noncovalent bonds (Aguilera, 1994). Formamide affected the growth of 15 mutants. Eight cdc42 alleles were found to confer formamide sensitivity at 25°C (Table 1); seven others showed enhanced temperature- sensitivity in formamide (Table 1). None of the cdc42 alleles exhibited sensitivity to high osmolarity at 25°C. Supplementation of rich medium with 1.3 M sorbitol did suppress the growth defect of cdc42-1, cdc42-101K5A, cdc42-12R163A,K166A, cdc42-124K183A,K184A,K186A,K187A, and cdc42-129V36T at 37°C. 0.9 M NaCl suppressed the growth defect of only cdc42-1, cdc42-101K5A, cdc42-124K183A,K184A,K186A,K187A, and cdc42-129V36T at 37°C. Suppression with 0.9 M KCl at 37°C was restricted to cdc42-1 and cdc42-101K5A. These results demonstrate that the phenotypes conferred by the site-directed cdc42 mutations are not equivalent and that the cdc42 mutations have different effects on cell physiology.
Relating Cdc42p Function to Structure
During the course of this study, several structural models of human Cdc42p were solved (Feltham et al., 1997; Rittinger et al., 1997; Nassar et al., 1998). Based on the sequence identity (80%) between human and S. cerevisiae Cdc42p and the ability of human Cdc42p to replace S. cerevisiae Cdc42p in vivo (Munemitsu et al., 1990; Shinjo et al., 1990), we felt justified in mapping the mutations generated in this study and the functional defects associated with each onto a structural model of human Cdc42p (Figure 2). As validation of our strategy for targeting surface-exposed residues, only four mutations affected residues (K16, D57, R68, and D76) that were not fully exposed on the surface of Cdc42p. In some cases, mutations that confer the same phenotype are clustered on the surface of Cdc42p. For example, mutations that confer only cold sensitivity (Figure 2A, blue residues) are found exclusively in the switch II region, and mutations that confer both cold and temperature sensitivity (Figure 2A, pink residues) are found exclusively in the switch I region. This clustering suggests that mutations in these regions of Cdc42p perturb a common Cdc42p function or interaction with another protein. This interpretation is supported by the cytological examination of the defects caused by these mutations (see below).
Most striking is the distribution of the lethal and conditional-lethal mutations on the surface of Cdc42p versus the mutations that did not confer a growth phenotype. Mutations that confer a growth defect can be separated into one of two distinct hemispheres on the surface of Cdc42p (Figure 2, A and B, respectively). These hemispheres are separated by a broad meridian of uncharged residues (Figure 2C) on one side and “wild-type” residues (i.e., charged residues that when mutated have no growth defect on rich medium [Figure 2B, green residues]) on the other. Growth defects resulting from mutations in the first hemisphere (Figure 2A) were expected because the guanine nucleotide-binding pocket, switch I region, and switch II region are found therein. Several mutations that confer temperature sensitivity in the presence of formamide (cdc42-119E100A, cdc42-120E91A,K94A,E95A,K96A, and cdc42-140H102A,H103A,H104A) also map within this hemisphere to a region adjacent to switch II (Figure 2A, green residues behind and left of switch II). The mapping of growth defects (cdc42-123R163A,K166A, cdc42-125K153A,E156A, and cdc42-135R120A,D121A,D122A,K123A; also cdc42-121D170A,E171A in the presence of formamide) within the second hemisphere (Figure 2B) suggests the presence of an additional binding surface on Cdc42p.
This additional binding surface may be formed in part by the Rho-insert region, a 13-amino acid region (see Figure 2A and right circled region in Figure 2C) that is unique to proteins within the Rho family of the Ras superfamily (Valencia et al., 1991). To determine which of the residues in the Rho-insert region are required for growth, four alleles (cdc42-136R120A, cdc42-137D121A, cdc42-138D122A, and cdc42-139K123A) were constructed with only one residue mutated per allele. None of the four alleles phenocopied the recessive lethality of cdc42-135R120A,D121A,D122A,K123A under like conditions, indicating that no one residue within this cluster is essential for growth.
To determine whether the growth defects associated with each CDC42 allele are attributable to aberrant Cdc42p levels, we raised a polyclonal antibody against a peptide within a region of Cdc42p (Figure 3A, boldface sequence) that is not conserved among the other five Rho proteins in S. cerevisiae. Immunoblots of whole cell lysates of E. coli expressing S. cerevisiae Cdc42p and wild-type yeast show that affinity-purified anti-Cdc42 peptide antibody recognizes a polypeptide of ∼22 kDa, the predicted molecular mass of Cdc42p (Figure 3B). An unidentified polypeptide of ∼48 kDa is also recognized by the anti-Cdc42 peptide antibody. As expected for Cdc42p, the 22-kDa polypeptide is nearly undetectable in lysates of cdc42-1 cells, which are known to have dramatically reduced Cdc42p levels compared with wild-type strains (Ziman et al., 1991). Conversely, upon galactose-induced overexpression of Cdc42p in yeast, the amount of the 22-kDa polypeptide in a yeast whole cell lysate is greater (Figure 3C, right lane) than that detected in lysates of yeast cells expressing vector alone (Figure 3C, left lane) or in uninduced cells, indicating that the peptide antibody recognizes Cdc42p in yeast whole cell lysates. Of the temperature-conditional-lethal haploid cdc42 strains, none displayed aberrant Cdc42p levels at the permissive temperature or upon shift to a restrictive temperature (Figure 3D, top row) for a period of time known to be sufficient to elicit a terminal phenotype (Table 2 and our unpublished results). Of the non-temperature-conditional haploid strains, three alleles (cdc42-108R147A,E148A,K150A, cdc42-109E140A, and cdc42-121D170A,E171A) confer reduced Cdc42p levels with respect to a wild-type control strain at 25°C (Figure 3D, bottom row). Of these three alleles, only cdc42-109E140A contains a mutation within the Cdc42 peptide that was used as an immunogen. Therefore, the reduced Cdc42p levels conferred by cdc42-108R147A,E148A,K150A and cdc42-121D170A,E171A are not likely due to reduced antibody avidity. Thus far, cdc42-108R147A,E148A,K150A is phenotypically indistinguishable from the wild type, indicating that Cdc42p is present in cells at a level beyond that required for normal vegetative growth. The lack of correlation between Cdc42p levels and the phenotypes of the mutant strains indicates that the observed phenotypes are not due to altered Cdc42p levels but result from defective Cdc42p-protein interactions.
Table 2.
Hours at 37°C | Percent unbudded | Percent small budded | Percent medium budded | Percent large budded | Percent other | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC42 | 0 | 42 | 30 | 8 | 19 | 0 |
6 | 46 | 33 | 6 | 16 | 0 | |
cdc42-1 | 0 | 62 | 30 | 4 | 5 | 0 |
6 | 89 | 8 | <1 | 1 | 2 | |
cdc42-101 | 0 | 46 | 30 | 10 | 15 | 0 |
6 | 97 | 2 | 1 | <1 | 0 | |
cdc42-118 | 0 | 56 | 27 | 2 | 15 | 0 |
6 | 91 | 4 | <1 | 4 | 1 | |
cdc42-123 | 0 | 75 | 18 | 3 | 5 | 0 |
6 | 88 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
cdc42-124 | 0 | 58 | 30 | 3 | 9 | <1 |
6 | 78 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 8 | |
cdc42-129 | 0 | 52 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 19 |
6 | 39 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 55 |
For each time point, 200 cells were scored by phase-contrast microscopy. A cell was scored as unbudded if no bud was observed, small budded if the volume of the bud appeared <30% the volume of the mother cell, medium budded if the volume of the bud appeared 30–50% the volume of the mother cell, and large budded if the volume of the bud appeared >50% the volume of the mother cell. “Other” describes grossly misshapen buds and cells, including elongate buds.
Phenotypic Evidence for Novel cdc42 Functions
Microscopic examination of each cdc42 haploid strain revealed even greater phenotypic diversity than was found in the initial analysis of growth. At 25°C, a temperature permissive for growth, several cdc42 haploid strains exhibited aberrant morphologies that can be grouped into three categories: elliptical cells, cells with elongate buds, and cells of heterogenous size and shape. One hundred percent of the cdc42-102D11A and cdc42-116E62A,D63A haploids possessed an elliptical morphology, as opposed to the spherical morphology characteristic of wild-type haploids (Figure 4). This phenotype was more pronounced in the cdc42-117D65A,R66A,R68A strain, in which 100% of the cells were elongate and larger than wild-type cells (Figure 4); these cells often had multiple buds and displayed a triskelion-like morphology. cdc42-126Y32K and cdc42-129V36T strains displayed an elongate bud morphology (Figure 4), whereas cdc42-123R163A,K166A and cdc42-131N39A strains exhibited a heterogenous cell size and shape. To the best of our knowledge, the morphologies of cdc42-102D11A, cd42-116E62A,D63A, cdc42-117D65A,R66A,R68A, cdc42-123R163A,K166A, and cdc42-131N39A strains represent novel cdc42 phenotypes and suggest the disruption of novel Cdc42p functions.
Fluorescence microscopy was used to assess the distribution of Cdc42p, the actin cytoskeleton, and the nucleus in each cdc42 haploid strain grown in log phase at 25°C. In wild-type yeast, the anti-Cdc42 antibody recognizes an epitope at the incipient bud site and at the tips of nascent buds (Figure 5A, left), which is consistent with previously reported Cdc42p localization patterns (Ziman et al., 1993). Compared with wild-type cells (Figure 5A, left), the intensity of Cdc42p staining is greatly reduced in cdc42-1 cells (Figure 5A, right) and greatly increased in cells overexpressing Cdc42p (Figure 5B, right). Because the intensity of fluorescence in a given strain (Figure 5) correlated with the amount of Cdc42p (i.e., the 22-kDa polypeptide) in whole cell lysates of the same strain (Figure 3, B and C), we conclude that the anti-Cdc42 peptide antibody is specific for Cdc42p in cells prepared for immunofluorescence microscopy. The same anti-Cdc42 peptide antibody revealed that Cdc42p localizes in each cdc42 strain grown at 25°C with the same distribution described for wild-type cells, although the intensity of staining varied among the cdc42 strains. Compared with wild-type cells, the intensity of Cdc42p staining was less in cdc42-119E100A, cdc42-121D170A,E171A, and cdc42-137D121A strains and was almost undetectable in cdc42-124K183A,K184A,K186A,K187A. Polarization of the actin cytoskeleton before budding and the fidelity of nuclear segregation were also comparable to those in wild-type cells in all but two cdc42 strains grown at 25°C. In cdc42-123R163A,K166A and cdc42-129V36T cultures, the number of unbudded cells with a polarized actin cytoskeleton as a percentage of the total number of unbudded cells was 73% (n = 259) and 87% (n = 111), respectively. In contrast, in log-phase wild-type cultures or in cultures of the other temperature-sensitive strains at 25°C, only 39–48% (n = 200–259) of the total number of unbudded cells possessed a polarized actin cytoskeleton. In addition, 12 and 24% of the unbudded cells in cdc42-123R163A,K166A and cdc42-129V36T cultures, respectively, were multinucleate at 25°C. These results strongly suggest that cdc42-123R163A,K166A and cdc42-129V36T confer a unique cdc42 phenotype, a delay in budding after the polarization of the actin cytoskeleton to the incipient bud site.
Microscopic examination of the cdc42ts strains at 37°C, a temperature restrictive for growth, revealed additional phenotypic evidence for novel Cdc42p functions. After a shift from 25 to 37°C for 6 h, the cdc42-101K5A, cdc42-118D76A, cdc42-123R163A,K166A, and cdc42-124K183A,K184A,K186A,K187A strains displayed a large unbudded arrest (Figures 4 and 6, D–F), a loss of Cdc42p localization (Figure 6D; cdc42-118D76A shown as an example), and a depolarized actin cytoskeleton (Figure 6E), phenocopying the terminal arrest phenotype of cdc42-1 strains (Table 2 and Adams et al., 1990). At 37°C, cdc42-101K5A and cdc42-118D76A strains arrested as early as the first cell cycle. At 2 h after the shift to 37°C, 73 and 84% (n = 200) of the cells in cdc42-101K5A and cdc42-118D76A cultures, respectively, were unbudded, compared with 46% in a wild-type culture. cdc42-129V36T cells, however, displayed a much different terminal phenotype at 37°C. At 6 h after the shift, the cdc42-129V36T culture contained a mixed population of cells: 39% were unbudded and 55% were severely misshapen, clumped, and/or convoluted, often containing one or more elongate buds (Table 2 and Figure 4). Fluorescence microscopy of cdc42-129V36T cells incubated at 37°C for 6 h revealed that, as at 25°C, many of the unbudded cells were multinucleate (see above); in budded cells, however, nuclear segregation appeared normal (Figure 6I). At 37°C, Cdc42p in cdc42-129V36T cells is localized at incipient bud sites and to the bud tip (Figure 6G), along with the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 6H). This distribution of Cdc42p and actin suggests that one defect in cdc42-129V36T cells is an inability to make a developmental switch from polarized to isotropic bud growth.
Evidence for Distinct Separable Cdc42p Functions
Phenotypic heterogeneity within the cdc42 collection suggested that the cdc42 alleles are defective in different functions. Identification of two cdc42 intragenic complementation groups supports this hypothesis (Table 3). cdc42-101K5A, cdc42-118D76A, cdc42-123R163A,K166A, and cdc42-124K183A,K184A,K186A,K187A form one complementation group; these alleles failed to complement each other and therefore are defective in at least one common essential Cdc42p function. cdc42-129V36T did complement cdc42-101K5A, cdc42-118D76A, cdc42-123R163A,K166A, and cdc42-124K183A,K184A,K186A,K187A and is the sole member of the second complementation group. cdc42-1 did not complement any cdc42ts allele at any temperature, suggesting that this allele has pleiotrophic effects. The two observed complementation groups correspond, respectively, to the two main morphological groups found at restrictive temperatures (large unbudded cells and cells with elongated buds), supporting the idea that the two morphological groups are due to defects in different Cdc42p-protein interactions.
Table 3.
CDC42 | cdc42-101 | cdc42-118 | cdc42-123 | cdc42-124 | cdc42-129 | cdc42-1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC42 | + | ||||||
cdc42-101 | + | − | |||||
cdc42-118 | + | − | − | ||||
cdc42-123 | + | − | − | − | |||
cdc42-124 | + | − | − | − | − | ||
cdc42-129 | + | + | + | + | + | − | |
cdc42-1 | + | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Pairwise crosses between each cdc42ts allele were made by mating each haploid cdc42ts strain to each other. The diploid cells resulting from the mating were struck to single colonies on rich medium and scored for growth after incubation at 34°C for 2 d. + indicates wild type growth, − indicates no growth (no single colonies). Reciprocal pairwise crosses in which the mating type of the strain containing each allele was reversed yielded identical results (not shown).
Although cdc42-101K5A, cdc42-118D76A, cdc42-123R163A,K166A, and cdc42-124K183A,K184A,K186A,K187A mutants arrest as large unbudded cells at restrictive temperatures and constitute a single complementation group, these strains nevertheless differ phenotypically (e.g., differential suppression of growth defects with osmotic support; see above). Therefore, it is unlikely that these strains are solely defective in the same essential Cdc42p-dependent function. To demonstrate that these strains possess diverse cdc42 defects, we overexpressed individually five known effectors of S. cerevisiae Cdc42p and tested for suppression of the temperature-sensitive growth defect at 37°C (Table 4). The growth defect conferred by cdc42-101K5A at 37°C was suppressed by the galactose-induced overexpression of GIC1, a gene known to play a role in cytoskeletal polarization, but not by its close relative GIC2 or any other Cdc42p effector tested (Brown et al., 1997; Chen et al., 1997). The growth defect conferred by cdc42-118D76A at 37°C was suppressed by the overexpression of STE20, a serine/threonine kinase of the PAK family (Peter et al., 1996; Leberer et al., 1997) known to be involved in cytoskeletal regulation (Eby et al., 1998). Overexpression of STE20 only weakly suppressed the growth defects of cdc42-1 and cdc42-123R163A,K166A. cdc42-129V36T, which is in a different intragenic complementation group from cdc42-101K5A, cdc42-118D76A, and cdc42-123R163A,K166A, was only weakly suppressed at 37°C by the overexpression of the PAK family kinases CLA4 (Cvrckováet al., 1995) and SKM1 (Martín et al., 1997), although CLA4 overexpression can suppress the cold sensitivity of cdc42-129V36T at 14°C. These results indicate that the cdc42ts alleles perturb distinct Cdc42p functions and provide evidence that these Cdc42p functions can be attributed to distinct surfaces and protein–Cdc42p interactions.
Table 4.
Vector | STE20 | CLA4 | SKM1 | GIC1 | GIC2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC42 | + | + | − | + | + | + |
cdc42-101 | − | − | − | − | + | − |
cdc42-118 | − | + | − | − | − | − |
cdc42-123 | − | +/− | − | − | +/− | +/− |
cdc42-129 | − | − | +/− | +/− | − | − |
cdc42-1 | − | +/− | − | − | +/− | − |
cdc42ts strains (MATa; see Table 1) were transformed with galactose-inducible URA3-marked cen plasmids containing known effectors of Cdc42. Transformation with vector (pRB1438), pGAL-STE20, pGAL-CLA4, pGAL-SKM1, pGAL-GIC1, and pGAL-GIC2 yielded, respectively, CDC42: DDY 1610, 1611, 1612, 1613, 1614, 1615; cdc42-1: DDY 1616, 1617, 1618, 1619, 1620, 1621; cdc42-101: DDY 1622, 1623, 1624, 1625, 1626, 1627; cdc42-118: DDY 1628, 1629, 1630, 1631, 1632, 1633; cdc42-123: DDY 1634, 1635, 1636, 1637, 1638, 1639; and cdc42-129: DDY 1640, 1641, 1642, 1643, 1644, 1645. Transformants were struck to single colonies on selective medium containing galactose and incubated at 37°C. + indicates wild type growth, +/− indicates weak growth, and − indicates no growth (single colonies). Overexpression of CLA4 inhibits the growth of wild-type cells at 37°C but not 25°C. cdc42-124 was not included in this analysis because it is not temperature sensitive on selective media.
DISCUSSION
Separation-of-function alleles are required to enumerate the Cdc42-dependent steps in morphogenesis/cell division and to determine whether one or more Cdc42p-protein interactions are required for each step. Four lines of evidence presented in this study reveal novel roles for Cdc42p and show that bud formation involves multiple essential Cdc42p interactions. First, cdc42 mutants show a diversity of morphological defects. Second, cdc42ts mutants fall into two intragenic complementation groups. Third, genes encoding Cdc42p effectors confer allele-specific dosage suppression of cdc42 conditional-lethal mutants. Fourth, four cdc42 mutants that arrest as large unbudded cells under restrictive conditions show differential suppression of growth defects on different media.
The elongate buds observed in one cdc42 complementation group (i.e., cdc42-129V36T) suggest that one distinct function of Cdc42p is to facilitate the developmental switch from polarized to isotropic bud growth during G2 of the cell cycle. During this switch, the cortical actin cytoskeleton, which is localized to regions of active cell growth (Adams and Pringle, 1984), must be redistributed from the bud tip to the circumference of the bud. Because overexpression of constitutively active Cdc42p (G12V or Q61L) is known to result in elongate buds (Ziman et al., 1991), it is possible that Cdc42p is not properly down-regulated in cdc42-129V36T cells during G2. The recessive nature of cdc42-129V36T, however, suggests a loss rather than a gain of Cdc42p function; i.e., cdc42-129V36T cells may have lost the ability to generate a signal that promotes the redistribution of the actin cytoskeleton in G2. The Cdc42p-dependent activation of the kinase Gin4p via the Cdc42p effector Cla4p is required for the switch from apical to isotropic bud growth (Tjandra et al., 1998). Several lines of evidence suggest that the hyperpolarized bud growth observed in cdc42-129V36T cells is due to a defect in this pathway. First, defects in Cla4p and Gin4p function phenocopy the morphology of cdc42-129V36T cells. Specifically, gin4Δ in a Clb2p-dependent background (Altman and Kellogg, 1997), cla4Δ, and cla4ts (Cvrckováet al., 1995; Tjandra et al., 1998; Weiss and Drubin, unpublished results) all confer elongate buds. Second, the growth defect associated with cdc42-129V36T at 14°C is specifically suppressed by the overexpression of CLA4. Third, Gin4p kinase activity is reduced in cdc42-129V36T cells (Tjandra and Kellogg, personal communication). Thus, the product encoded by cdc42-129V36T is predicted to be defective in its interaction with Cla4p.
Mutations in the switch II region of Cdc42p also confer a defect in morphogenesis; however, in contrast to the recessive cdc42-129V36T allele, cdc42-116E62A,D63A and cdc42-117D65A,R66A,R68A are dominant for their morphological phenotypes. Recent modeling of a human Cdc42p-GTPase–activating protein (GAP) complex indicates that E62 and D63 of the Cdc42p switch II region are in contact with a GAP (Rittinger et al., 1997; Nassar et al., 1998). In S. cerevisiae, failure to properly interact with one or more of the Cdc42-GAPs (i.e., Bem3p, Rga1p, and Rga2p) may be the cause of the elongate morphology and cold sensitivity conferred by cdc42-116E62A,D63A and cdc42-117D65A,R66A,R68A. Similar morphologies are observed in S. cerevisiae when the known Cdc42-GAPs suffer a concomitant loss of function (Smith and Sprague, personal communication), strongly supporting the idea that cdc42-116E62A,D63A and cdc42-117D65A,R66A,R68A are defective in GAP binding.
The structural model of the human Cdc42p-GAP complex also shows an intramolecular hydrogen bond between D76, which is just C terminal to switch II, and R187 (K in S. cerevisiae), which is in the C-terminal polybasic region of Cdc42p (Nassar et al., 1998). This interaction is predicted to stabilize the C terminus of Cdc42p for its interaction with the GAP. Consistent with this model, both cdc42-118D76A and cdc42-124K183A,K184A,K186A,K187A share the same terminal phenotype, which is the expected result if both mutations cause a defect in the same interaction. However, the phenotype of large, unbudded, multinucleate cells with a depolarized actin cytoskeleton at 37°C is itself inconsistent with impaired GAP-stimulated GTP hydrolysis, which would be expected to confer a more highly polarized (elongate) morphology, as observed with cdc42-116E62A,D63A and cdc42-117D65A,R66A,R68A cells (see above) or with cells overexpressing constitutively active CDC42 (Ziman et al., 1991; Davis et al., 1998). Therefore, if D76 does indeed stabilize the C terminus in vivo, it may be to promote the interaction of the C terminus with proteins that down-regulate Cdc42p activity (e.g., GDI) and/or effectors of Cdc42p (e.g., Ste20p).
The Rho-insert region may also stabilize intermolecular contacts. Structural (Feltham et al., 1997) and biochemical (McCallum et al., 1996) studies suggest that the Rho-insert region of Cdc42p (residues 122–134) is a secondary binding site or “footrest” for effectors that bind to switch I. The Rho-insert region clearly has a role because deletion of this region abolishes the transforming activity of a mutant human Cdc42p (F28L) (Wu et al., 1998). As demonstrated with Rac (Joseph and Pick, 1995; Freeman et al., 1996; Wei et al., 1997), this region may be important for target specificity. Even though one allele (cdc42-135R120A,D121A,D122A,K123A) consisting of mutations within the insert region resulted in a growth defect, supporting recent observations that this region of Cdc42p is functionally important, no other mutations (i.e., cdc42-105E127A,K128A and cdc42-107R131A,R133A,R135A) yielded a functional defect. This observation suggests that only part of the Rho-insert region in Cdc42p is important for functional interactions.
Overlapping the Rho-insert region on the face of Cdc42p opposite switch I and switch II, a putative binding region (Figure 2B) is defined by cdc42-135R120A,D121A,D122A,K123A and by the conditional-lethal alleles cdc42-121D170A,E171A and cdc42-123R163A,K166A. Although the residues mutated in the recessive-lethal allele cdc42-125K153A,E156A are located in this region as well, these residues are part of a conserved GTP-binding/hydrolysis domain. Therefore, the lethality associated with cdc42-125K153A,E156A, as well as that of cdc42-111K16A, cdc42-115D57A, and cdc42-134D118A, is more likely to be the result of defective nucleotide binding/hydrolysis than defective Cdc42p-protein interactions. The residues mutated in both cdc42-121D170A,E171A and cdc42-123R163A,K166A are part of the C-terminal α5-helix. In support of our functional mapping data, which suggest that this region forms an additional intermolecular contact site and contributes to the specificity of Cdc42p interactions in vivo, recent nuclear magnetic resonance data show contact between the α5-helix of human Cdc42p and the CRIB (Cdc42/Rac interactive binding) motif–containing GTPase-binding domains of WASP (Abdul-Manan et al., 1999), PAK (Guo et al., 1998; Stevens et al., 1999), and ACK tyrosine kinase (Mott et al., 1999). These structural data suggest that the α5-helix of Cdc42p is a specificity determinant (Guo et al., 1998; Abdul-Manan et al., 1999; Mott et al., 1999). Consistent with our in vivo data demonstrating a loss of function when K166 is mutated to alanine, the Cdc42p-ACK solution structure shows P513 of ACK tyrosine kinase packed against K166 of human Cdc42p (Mott et al., 1999). Of particular relevance to cdc42-121D170A,E171A, the Cdc42p-WASP solution structure shows hydrogen bonding between E171 of Cdc42p and K235 of WASP (Abdul-Manan et al., 1999). Although it is tempting to speculate that the growth defect conferred by cdc42-121D170A,E171A is due to a defective Cdc42p interaction with the yeast homologue of WASP, Las17p, no CRIB motif exists in Las17p (Burbelo et al., 1995), making a similar binding interaction unlikely. Therefore, in S. cerevisiae at least, the Cdc42p α5-helix may serve as a site of intermolecular contact and as a specificity determinant for Cdc42p effectors, other than Las17p, that contain a CRIB motif.
The extensiveness of our analyses in vivo and the recent availability of Cdc42p structural models (Feltham et al., 1997; Rittinger et al., 1997; Nassar et al., 1998) have provided an opportunity to relate Cdc42p function to structure. Although studies of Ras established a paradigm for relating the structure of a small GTP-binding protein to function (Bourne et al., 1991; Valencia et al., 1991; Zerial and Huber, 1995; Campbell et al., 1998), distinct differences have been shown between the structure-function relationships of Ras and Rho proteins (Valencia et al., 1991; Ziman et al., 1991; Self et al., 1993; Xu et al., 1994; Joseph and Pick, 1995; Li and Zheng, 1997; Hoffman et al., 1998). Therefore, Ras models cannot define all of the structure-function relationships of Cdc42p. In addition to identifying novel functions and functional domains of Cdc42p, our results have formed a broad genetic foundation for the continuing analysis of a highly conserved signal transduction molecule.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank K. Ayscough, G. Barnes, B. Bart, L. Belmont, I. Cheeseman, M. Duncan, B. Goode, C. Hofmann, P. Lappalainen, and E. Weiss for critical advice and comments. We also thank D. King for very helpful advice on peptide chemistry and J. Cope for patient assistance with the structural graphics. We thank D. Botstein, C. Chan, G. Chen, D. Kellogg, M. Molina, M. Peter, M. Shulewitz, F. Solomon, J. Thorner, and Y. Zheng for kindly supplying reagents. This work was supported by a Helen Hay Whitney Postdoctoral Fellowship to K.G.K., a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Predoctoral Fellowship to A.A.R., and National Institutes of Health grant GM50399 to D.G.D.
REFERENCES
- Abdul-Manan N, Aghazadeh B, Liu GA, Majumdar A, Ouerfelli O, Siminovitch KA, Rosen MK. Structure of Cdc42 in complex with the GTPase-binding domain of the ‘Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome’ protein. Nature. 1999;399:379–383. doi: 10.1038/20726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams AE, Johnson DI, Longnecker RM, Sloat BF, Pringle JR. CDC42 and CDC43, two additional genes involved in budding and the establishment of cell polarity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1990;111:131–142. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.1.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams AE, Pringle JR. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1984;98:934–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adari H, Lowy DR, Willumsen BM, Der CJ, McCormick F. Guanosine triphosphatase activating protein (GAP) interacts with the p21 ras effector binding domain. Science. 1988;240:518–521. doi: 10.1126/science.2833817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aguilera A. Formamide sensitivity: a novel conditional phenotype in yeast. Genetics. 1994;136:87–91. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.1.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altman R, Kellogg D. Control of mitotic events by Nap1 and the Gin4 kinase. J Cell Biol. 1997;138:119–130. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.1.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Ayscough KR, Drubin DG. Immunofluorescence microscopy of yeast cells. In: Celis J, editor. Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press; 1998. pp. 447–485. [Google Scholar]
- Belmont LD, Drubin DG. The yeast V159N actin mutant reveals roles for actin dynamics in vivo. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:1289–1299. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.5.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boeke JD, LaCroute F, Fink GR. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197:345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bond JF, Fridovich-Keil JL, Pillus L, Mulligan RC, Solomon F. A chicken-yeast chimeric β-tubulin protein is incorporated into mouse microtubules in vivo. Cell. 1986;44:461–468. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90467-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bourne HR, Sanders DA, McCormick F. The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism. Nature. 1991;349:117–127. doi: 10.1038/349117a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brennwald P, Novick P. Interactions of three domains distinguishing the Ras-related GTP-binding proteins Ypt1 and Sec4. Nature. 1993;362:560–563. doi: 10.1038/362560a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown JL, Jaquenoud M, Gulli MP, Chant J, Peter M. Novel Cdc42-binding proteins Gic1 and Gic2 control cell polarity in yeast. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2972–2982. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.22.2972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burbelo PD, Drechsel D, Hall A. A conserved binding motif defines numerous candidate target proteins for both Cdc42 and Rac GTPases. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:29071–29074. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.49.29071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabib E, Drgonová J, Drgon T. Role of small G proteins in yeast cell polarization and wall biosynthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:307–333. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calés C, Hancock JF, Marshall CJ, Hall A. The cytoplasmic protein GAP is implicated as the target for regulation by the ras gene product. Nature. 1988;332:548–551. doi: 10.1038/332548a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell SL, Khosravi-Far R, Rossman KL, Clark GJ, Der CJ. Increasing complexity of Ras signaling. Oncogene. 1998;17:1395–1413. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen GC, Kim YJ, Chan CS. The Cdc42 GTPase-associated proteins Gic1 and Gic2 are required for polarized cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2958–2971. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.22.2958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1976;105:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90191-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cvrcková F, De Virgilio C, Manser E, Pringle JR, Nasmyth K. Ste20-like protein kinases are required for normal localization of cell growth and for cytokinesis in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 1995;9:1817–1830. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.15.1817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis CR, Richman TJ, Deliduka SB, Blaisdell JO, Collins CC, Johnson DI. Analysis of the mechanisms of action of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae dominant lethal cdc42G12V and dominant negative cdc42D118A mutations. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:849–858. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.2.849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunn B, Stearns T, Botstein D. Specificity domains distinguish the Ras-related GTPases Ypt1 and Sec4. Nature. 1993;362:563–565. doi: 10.1038/362563a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eby JJ, Holly SP, van Drogen F, Grishin AV, Peter M, Drubin DG, Blumer KJ. Actin cytoskeleton organization regulated by the PAK family of protein kinases. Curr Biol. 1998;8:967–970. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)00398-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feltham JL, Dötsch V, Raza S, Manor D, Cerione RA, Sutcliffe MJ, Wagner G, Oswald RE. Definition of the switch surface in the solution structure of Cdc42Hs. Biochemistry. 1997;36:8755–8766. doi: 10.1021/bi970694x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman JL, Abo A, Lambeth JD. Rac “insert region” is a novel effector region that is implicated in the activation of NADPH oxidase, but not PAK65. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:19794–19801. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.33.19794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Ranea JA, Valencia A. Distribution and functional diversification of the ras superfamily in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1998;434:219–225. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00967-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo W, Sutcliffe MJ, Cerione RA, Oswald RE. Identification of the binding surface on Cdc42Hs for p21-activated kinase. Biochemistry. 1998;37:14030–14037. doi: 10.1021/bi981352+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman GR, Nassar N, Oswald RE, Cerione RA. Fluoride activation of the Rho family GTP-binding protein Cdc42Hs. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:4392–4399. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.8.4392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983;153:163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson DI. Cdc42: an essential Rho-type GTPase controlling eukaryotic cell polarity. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63:54–105. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.1.54-105.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson DI, Pringle JR. Molecular characterization of CDC42, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in the development of cell polarity. J Cell Biol. 1990;111:143–152. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston M, Davis RW. Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984;4:1440–1448. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.8.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joneson T, Bar-Sagi D. A Rac1 effector site controlling mitogenesis through superoxide production. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:17991–17994. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.29.17991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joseph G, Pick E. “Peptide walking” is a novel method for mapping functional domains in proteins: its application to the Rac1-dependent activation of NADPH oxidase. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:29079–29082. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.49.29079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozminski KG, Diener DR, Rosenbaum JL. High level expression of nonacetylatable α-tubulin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1993;25:158–170. doi: 10.1002/cm.970250205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamarche N, Tapon N, Stowers L, Burbelo PD, Aspenström P, Bridges T, Chant J, Hall A. Rac and Cdc42 induce actin polymerization and G1 cell cycle progression independently of p65PAK and the JNK/SAPK MAP kinase cascade. Cell. 1996;87:519–529. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81371-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lappalainen P, Fedorov EV, Fedorov AA, Almo SC, Drubin DG. Essential functions and actin-binding surfaces of yeast cofilin revealed by systematic mutagenesis. EMBO J. 1997;16:5520–5530. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.18.5520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leberer E, Wu C, Leeuw T, Fourest-Lieuvin A, Segall JE, Thomas DY. Functional characterization of the Cdc42p binding domain of yeast Ste20p protein kinase. EMBO J. 1997;16:83–97. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li R, Zheng Y. Residues of the Rho family GTPases Rho and Cdc42 that specify sensitivity to Dbl-like guanine nucleotide exchange factors. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:4671–4679. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.8.4671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackay DJ, Hall A. Rho GTPases. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:20685–20688. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.33.20685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madden K, Snyder M. Cell polarity and morphogenesis in budding yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:687–744. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.52.1.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martín H, Mendoza A, Rodríguez-Pachón JM, Molina M, Nombela C. Characterization of SKM1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene encoding a novel Ste20/PAK-like protein kinase. Mol Microbiol. 1997;23:431–444. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.d01-1870.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCallum SJ, Wu WJ, Cerione RA. Identification of a putative effector for Cdc42Hs with high sequence similarity to the RasGAP-related protein IQGAP1 and a Cdc42Hs binding partner with similarity to IQGAP2. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:21732–21737. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.36.21732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller PJ, Johnson DI. Cdc42p GTPase is involved in controlling polarized cell growth in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:1075–1083. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller PJ, Johnson DI. Characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc42-1ts allele and new temperature-conditional-lethal cdc42 alleles. Yeast. 1997;13:561–572. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199705)13:6<561::AID-YEA114>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mott HR, Owen D, Nietlispach D, Lowe PN, Manser E, Lim L, Laue ED. Structure of the small G protein Cdc42 bound to the GTPase-binding domain of ACK. Nature. 1999;399:384–388. doi: 10.1038/20732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mulholland J, Preuss D, Moon A, Wong A, Drubin D, Botstein D. Ultrastructure of the yeast actin cytoskeleton and its association with the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol. 1994;125:381–391. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.2.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Munemitsu S, Innis MA, Clark R, McCormick F, Ullrich A, Polakis P. Molecular cloning and expression of a G25K cDNA, the human homolog of the yeast cell cycle gene CDC42. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:5977–5982. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nassar N, Hoffman GR, Manor D, Clardy JC, Cerione RA. Structures of Cdc42 bound to the active and catalytically compromised forms of Cdc42GAP. Nat Struct Biol. 1998;5:1047–1052. doi: 10.1038/4156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nonaka H, Tanaka K, Hirano H, Fujiwara T, Kohno H, Umikawa M, Mino A, Takai Y. A downstream target of RHO1 small GTP-binding protein is PKC1, a homolog of protein kinase C, which leads to activation of the MAP kinase cascade in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1995;14:5931–5938. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00281.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohya Y, Qadota H, Anraku Y, Pringle JR, Botstein D. Suppression of yeast geranylgeranyl transferase I defect by alternative prenylation of two target GTPases, Rho1p and Cdc42p. Mol Biol Cell. 1993;4:1017–1025. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.10.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peränen J, Rikkonen M, Hyvönen M, Kääriäinen L. T7 vectors with modified T7lac promoter for expression of proteins in Escherichia coli. Anal Biochem. 1996;236:371–373. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peter M, Neiman AM, Park HO, van Lohuizen M, Herskowitz I. Functional analysis of the interaction between the small GTP binding protein Cdc42 and the Ste20 protein kinase in yeast. EMBO J. 1996;15:7046–7059. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rittinger K, Walker PA, Eccleston JF, Nurmahomed K, Owen D, Laue E, Gamblin SJ, Smerdon SJ. Crystal structure of a small G protein in complex with the GTPase-activating protein rhoGAP. Nature. 1997;388:693–697. doi: 10.1038/41805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahai E, Alberts AS, Treisman R. RhoA effector mutants reveal distinct effector pathways for cytoskeletal reorganization, SRF activation and transformation. EMBO J. 1998;17:1350–1361. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiestl RH, Gietz RD. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr Genet. 1989;16:339–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00340712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt A, Hall MN. Signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998;14:305–338. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Self AJ, Paterson HF, Hall A. Different structural organization of Ras and Rho effector domains. Oncogene. 1993;8:655–661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherman F, Fink GR, Hicks JB. Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Shinjo K, Koland JG, Hart MJ, Narasimhan V, Johnson DI, Evans T, Cerione RA. Molecular cloning of the gene for the human placental GTP-binding protein Gp (G25K): identification of this GTP-binding protein as the human homolog of the yeast cell-division-cycle protein CDC42. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:9853–9857. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sigal IS, Gibbs JB, D'Alonzo JS, Scolnick EM. Identification of effector residues and a neutralizing epitope of Ha-ras-encoded p21. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:4725–4729. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.13.4725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sikorski RS, Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989;122:19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stenmark H, Valencia A, Martinez O, Ullrich O, Goud B, Zerial M. Distinct structural elements of rab5 define its functional specificity. EMBO J. 1994;13:575–583. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06295.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stevens WK, Vranken W, Goudreau N, Xiang H, Xu P, Ni F. Conformation of a Cdc42/Rac interactive binding peptide in complex with Cdc42 and analysis of the binding interface. Biochemistry. 1999;38:5968–5975. doi: 10.1021/bi990426u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stowers L, Yelon D, Berg LJ, Chant J. Regulation of the polarization of T cells toward antigen-presenting cells by Ras-related GTPase CDC42. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:5027–5031. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.11.5027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tjandra H, Compton J, Kellogg D. Control of mitotic events by the Cdc42 GTPase, the Clb2 cyclin and a member of the PAK kinase family. Curr Biol. 1998;8:991–1000. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00419-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valencia A, Chardin P, Wittinghofer A, Sander C. The ras protein family: evolutionary tree and role of conserved amino acids. Biochemistry. 1991;30:4637–4648. doi: 10.1021/bi00233a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei Y, Zhang Y, Derewenda U, Liu X, Minor W, Nakamoto RK, Somlyo AV, Somlyo AP, Derewenda ZS. Crystal structure of RhoA-GDP and its functional implications. Nat Struct Biol. 1997;4:699–703. doi: 10.1038/nsb0997-699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wertman KF, Drubin DG, Botstein D. Systematic mutational analysis of the yeast ACT1 gene. Genetics. 1992;132:337–350. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu WJ, Lin R, Cerione RA, Manor D. Transformation activity of Cdc42 requires a region unique to Rho-related proteins. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:16655–16658. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.27.16655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu X, Barry DC, Settleman J, Schwartz MA, Bokoch GM. Differing structural requirements for GTPase-activating protein responsiveness and NADPH oxidase activation by Rac. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:23569–23574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zerial M, Huber LA. Guidebook to the Small GTPases. New York: Sambrook and Tooze; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng Y, Cerione R, Bender A. Control of the yeast bud-site assembly GTPase Cdc42: catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange by Cdc24 and stimulation of GTPase activity by Bem3. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:2369–2372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ziman M, O'Brien JM, Ouellette LA, Church WR, Johnson DI. Mutational analysis of CDC42Sc, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene that encodes a putative GTP-binding protein involved in the control of cell polarity. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11:3537–3544. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ziman M, Preuss D, Mulholland J, O'Brien JM, Botstein D, Johnson DI. Subcellular localization of Cdc42p, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae GTP-binding protein involved in the control of cell polarity. Mol Biol Cell. 1993;4:1307–1316. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.12.1307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zohar M, Teramoto H, Katz BZ, Yamada KM, Gutkind JS. Effector domain mutants of Rho dissociate cytoskeletal changes from nuclear signaling and cellular transformation. Oncogene. 1998;17:991–998. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zohn IM, Campbell SL, Khosravi-Far R, Rossman KL, Der CJ. Rho family proteins and Ras transformation: the RHOad less traveled gets congested. Oncogene. 1998;17:1415–1438. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]