Abstract
A comprehensive, multifaceted approach to HIV surveillance is needed to provide the information necessary for public health management and policy. Because HIV infection is not readily or uniformly ascertained, survey methods and sentinel surveillance approaches must be used. At least some of the surveys must be blinded, that is, anonymous and unlinked to identifiable persons, to avoid the uninterpretable impact of self-selection bias that could lead to both significant underestimates and occasional overestimates of HIV prevalence. Other surveys must be nonblinded, with careful interviews of volunteer participants to evaluate risk factors for HIV infection. These various surveys must continue over time to evaluate trends in infection. A comprehensive family of complementary HIV surveys and studies and a national household-based HIV seroprevalence survey have been undertaken by the Public Health Service in collaboration with other Federal agencies, State and local health departments, blood collection agencies, and medical research institutions. These projects focus on accessible segments of the general population, childbearing women, persons at high risk for HIV, and persons in special settings such as prisons and colleges. This comprehensive surveillance approach will help monitor the levels and trends of HIV infection in the United States and help prioritize, target, and evaluate HIV prevention activities.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker J. L., Kelen G. D., Sivertson K. T., Quinn T. C. Unsuspected human immunodeficiency virus in critically ill emergency patients. JAMA. 1987 May 15;257(19):2609–2611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bayer R., Levine C., Wolf S. M. HIV antibody screening. An ethical framework for evaluating proposed programs. JAMA. 1986 Oct 3;256(13):1768–1774. doi: 10.1001/jama.256.13.1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardy A. M., Starcher E. T., 2nd, Morgan W. M., Druker J., Kristal A., Day J. M., Kelly C., Ewing E., Curran J. W. Review of death certificates to assess completeness of AIDS case reporting. Public Health Rep. 1987 Jul-Aug;102(4):386–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoff R., Berardi V. P., Weiblen B. J., Mahoney-Trout L., Mitchell M. L., Grady G. F. Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus among childbearing women. Estimation by testing samples of blood from newborns. N Engl J Med. 1988 Mar 3;318(9):525–530. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198803033180901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krasinski K., Borkowsky W., Bebenroth D., Moore T. Failure of voluntary testing for human immunodeficiency virus to identify infected parturient women in a high-risk population. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jan 21;318(3):185–185. doi: 10.1056/nejm198801213180313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walters L. Ethical issues in the prevention and treatment of HIV infection and AIDS. Science. 1988 Feb 5;239(4840):597–603. doi: 10.1126/science.3340846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]