Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to determine if a new proposed arm ergometer protocol was advantageous in eliciting higher peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) when compared with two protocols currently referred to in the literature. Ten male subjects were tested on three different exercise protocols; a discontinuous test (DT), a continuous test (CT) and a new proposed jump-max test (JMT). The CT began at a work rate of 33 watts (W) (40 rpm) with the power output (PO) being increased 16 W every 3 minutes. The DT began without resistance on the ergometer flywheel (50 rpm) and the work rate was increased by 25 W every 3 minutes with a 1-minute rest between stages. The JMT began with a 3-minute pretest to determine a PO which elicited a HR of 120 +/- 5 beat min-1. After a 2-minute rest, subjects began exercise at the predetermined work rate (80 rpm) with the PO being increased 20 W each minute of the test. Oxygen uptake was measured minute by minute via open circuit spirometry. Peak VO2 was higher (p less than 0.05) in the JMT (mean +/- SEM = 2.36 +/- 0.06 l.min-1) when compared with either (means +/- SEM = 2.16 +/- 0.07 l.min-1) or the CT (means +/- SEM = 2.04 +/- 0.10 l.min-1). No difference (p greater than 0.05) existed in peak VO2 between the CT and the DT. These data suggest that the proposed JMT may result in a higher measured peak VO2 in subjects when compared with either DT or CT of moderate to long duration.
Full text
PDF

Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Davies C. T., Sargeant A. J. Physiological responses to standardised arm work. Ergonomics. 1974 Jan;17(1):41–49. doi: 10.1080/00140137408931311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glaser R. M., Sawka M. N., Brune M. F., Wilde S. W. Physiological responses to maximal effort wheelchair and arm crank ergometry. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Jun;48(6):1060–1064. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.6.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamon E., Pandolf K. B. Maximal aerobic power during laddermill climbing, uphill running, and cycling. J Appl Physiol. 1972 Apr;32(4):467–473. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1972.32.4.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magel J. R., McArdle W. D., Toner M., Delio D. J. Metabolic and cardiovascular adjustment to arm training. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 Jul;45(1):75–79. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.45.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petrofsky J. S., Phillips C. A., Sawka M. N., Hanpeter D., Stafford D. Blood flow and metabolism during isometric contractions in cat skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981 Mar;50(3):493–502. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1981.50.3.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powers S. K., Baker B. A., Deason R., Mangum M. A trend analysis of steady state oxygen consumption during arm crank ergometry. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1984 Jun;24(2):131–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powers S. K., Beadle R. E., Mangum M. Exercise efficiency during arm ergometry: effects of speed and work rate. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984 Feb;56(2):495–499. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1984.56.2.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawka M. N., Foley M. E., Pimental N. A., Toner M. M., Pandolf K. B. Determination of maximal aerobic power during upper-body exercise. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Jan;54(1):113–117. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.1.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawka M. N., Glaser R. M., Wilde S. W., von Luhrte T. C. Metabolic and circulatory responses to wheelchair and arm crank exercise. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Nov;49(5):784–788. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.49.5.784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawka M. N., Petrofsky J. S., Phillips C. A. Energy cost of submaximal isometric concentrations in cat fast and slow twitch muscles. Pflugers Arch. 1981 May;390(2):164–168. doi: 10.1007/BF00590201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwade J., Blomqvist C. G., Shapiro W. A comparison of the response to arm and leg work in patients with ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J. 1977 Aug;94(2):203–208. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(77)80281-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaw D. J., Crawford M. H., Karliner J. S., DiDonna G., Carleton R. M., Ross J., Jr, O'Rourke R. A. Arm-crank ergometry: a new method for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1974 May 20;33(6):801–805. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90225-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
