Abstract
Pulmonary infection by Yersinia pestis causes pneumonic plague, a rapidly progressing and often fatal disease. To aid the development of safe and effective pneumonic plague vaccines, we are deciphering mechanisms used by the immune system to protect against lethal pulmonary Y. pestis infection. In murine pneumonic plague models, passive transfer of convalescent-phase sera confers protection, as does active vaccination with live Y. pestis. Here, we demonstrate that protection by either protocol relies upon both gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) cytokines classically associated with type 1 cellular immunity. In both protocols, abrogating IFN-γ or TNF-α activity significantly decreases survival and increases the bacterial burden in pulmonary, splenic, and hepatic tissues. Neutralization of either cytokine also counteracts challenge-induced, vaccination-dependent upregulation of nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2). Moreover, genetic depletion of NOS2 suppresses protection conferred by serotherapy. We conclude that IFN-γ, TNF-α, and NOS2, key elements of cellular immunity, perform critical protective functions during humoral defense against lethal pulmonary Y. pestis challenge. These observations strongly suggest that plague vaccines should strive to maximally prime both cellular and humoral immunity.
Pneumonic plague is one of the most feared infectious diseases in recorded history. The etiologic agent of plague is Yersinia pestis, a facultative intracellular gram-negative bacillus that causes several different forms of disease (30). The least deadly form, bubonic plague, results from the bite of an infected flea and is characterized by painfully swollen lymph nodes, also known as buboes. When left untreated, bubonic plague can progress to the more deadly septicemic and pneumonic forms. The latter is highly contagious, rapidly progressing, and associated with high mortality.
There is no safe and effective pneumonic plague vaccine. Killed whole-cell vaccines protect against bubonic, but not pneumonic, plague (26, 39). Live attenuated Y. pestis vaccines protect mice and guinea pigs against pneumonic challenge, and limited data indicate that they also protect humans, but reactogenicity and safety concerns preclude their widespread use (16, 26, 39). It is widely acknowledged that military scientists formulated methods to aerosolize virulent Y. pestis organisms. If diagnosed early, plague can be treated with antibiotics. However, multidrug-resistant Y. pestis isolates have been identified (9), thus raising grave concern that antibiotic-resistant Y. pestis strains may be used as bioweapons (14).
It has long been recognized that serum samples isolated from plague convalescents can passively transfer protection to naïve mice (25). Given this demonstrated efficacy of humoral immunity, significant effort has been devoted to the development of subunit plague vaccines that generate protective antibody responses. Thus far, the Y. pestis fraction 1 (F1) and V proteins appear to offer the most promise. Vaccination with a recombinant F1-V fusion protein protects mice against lethal pulmonary challenge (1, 11, 12), and sera from mice vaccinated with F1 and V confer passive protection (10). Recently, the U.S. Army evaluated the F1-V fusion protein vaccine in nonhuman primates and found that it protected cynomolgus macaques but largely failed to protect African green monkeys (32). The variable efficacy of this vaccine in primates raises concern that humoral immunity directed at F1 and V may not suffice in protecting humans against pneumonic plague.
T-cell-dependent cellular immunity comprises another means by which vaccines can prime long-lived protection against facultative intracellular bacterial pathogens. Cell-mediated protection against intracellular bacteria often relies upon the development of type 1 immune responses, characterized by the expansion of pathogen-specific T cells that secrete gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (19). These cytokines are pleiotropic and likely combat intracellular bacteria by many mechanisms (23, 35). For example, IFN-γ and TNF-α stimulate macrophages to upregulate expression of nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2), thereby increasing their capacity to produce antimicrobial nitric oxide (24).
Y. pestis organisms can replicate within the macrophage phagolysosome and are found intracellularly during plague (6, 15, 22, 33, 37). Type 1 cellular immunity could potentially upregulate macrophage microbicidal activities, thereby helping to eradicate these intracellular Y. pestis reservoirs. Indeed, administration of IFN-γ and TNF-α prior to challenge protects naïve mice against a lethal systemic Y. pestis challenge (28). Moreover, STAT4-deficient mice are unable to generate robust type 1 responses (18, 38), and vaccinating with F1 and V fails to protect STAT4-deficient mice against subcutaneous Y. pestis challenge, despite eliciting high-titer antibody responses (8). While these observations suggest that type 1 cytokines may play critical roles during vaccine-mediated protection against Y. pestis infection, their relevance in the setting of pulmonary Y. pestis challenge remains to be determined, as do the underlying protective mechanisms.
Recently, we developed a model that enabled us to specifically investigate protective roles for cellular immunity during pulmonary Y. pestis infection. We found that actively vaccinating B-cell-deficient μMT mice with live Y. pestis primes T cells that confer protection against lethal pulmonary challenge (29). Here, we report that neutralization of either IFN-γ or TNF-α abrogates that protection. Moreover, we demonstrate that humoral protection mediated by passive serotherapy also relies upon IFN-γ, TNF-α, and NOS2. These findings reveal a previously unappreciated role for cellular defense mechanisms during humoral protection against lethal pulmonary Y. pestis infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice.
Wild-type, IFN-γ receptor (IFN-γR)-deficient, TNF-α-deficient, NOS2-deficient, and B-cell-deficient μMT mice, each on a C57BL/6 background, were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) or were bred at Trudeau Institute. Animals were cared for according to Trudeau Institute Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines.
Bacteria.
All experiments employed the pigmentation-negative Y. pestis strain KIM D27 (20), which was generously provided by Robert Brubaker (Michigan State University). Y. pestis organisms were grown in brain heart infusion broth (Sigma) at 26°C, and infectious stocks were stored as single-use aliquots at −70°C after resuspension in the same medium supplemented with 20% glycerol. The median lethal dose of this stock was approximately 1 × 104 CFU when administered via the intranasal (i.n.) route, as calculated by the method of Reed and Muench (34).
Convalescent-phase sera and passive serotherapy protocol.
To generate convalescent-phase sera for passive serotherapy, wild-type mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 3 × 102 Y. pestis CFU, and serum samples were collected 30 days later (29). The serum samples were pooled, aliquoted, and stored at −20°C. For passive serotherapy, mice were challenged intranasally with 30 μl saline containing 2 × 105 CFU Y. pestis, and 20 μl convalescent-phase sera was administered intraperitoneally 18 h later.
Active vaccination protocol.
B-cell-deficient μMT mice were inoculated intranasally with 30 μl saline containing 2 × 105 Y. pestis CFU and 20 μl convalescent-phase sera was administered 18 h later (29). At 2 weeks postvaccination, animals received chow supplemented with 67 mg of sulfadiazine per g of body weight and 333 mg of trimethoprim (Uniprim diet; Harlan TEKLAD, Madison, WI) per g and were so maintained until day 55 postvaccination, at which time they were returned to antibiotic-free chow. This antibiotic treatment ensured that the immunocompromised μMT mice did not inadvertently become infected with environmental pathogens prior to challenge infection (2 × 105 Y. pestis CFU i.n.), which was performed at day 60 postvaccination. Control sham-vaccinated mice also received convalescent-phase serum and antibiotic treatment (29). Where indicated, animals were treated with 1 mg neutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific for murine IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2) or TNF-α (clone XT3.11). The MAbs were administered as two intraperitoneal doses of 500 μg each on the day before and the day of challenge. Control animals received injections of isotype-matched antibody (rat immunoglobulin G1, clone HRPN). In all survival experiments, recumbent animals were considered moribund and euthanized.
Measurement of bacterial CFU and NOS2 mRNA levels.
At the indicated days postchallenge infection, mice were euthanized by carbon dioxide narcosis. Spleens, livers, and saline-perfused lungs were harvested and plated for CFU determination as previously described (29). The tissue levels of NOS2 mRNA were measured by real-time PCR, normalized to the levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA, and reported as changes relative to the levels in uninfected wild-type mice (17, 36).
Statistics.
Survival data were analyzed by log-rank tests. All other data were analyzed using Student's t tests (GraphPad Prism 4.0 software). Unless otherwise noted, CFU and mRNA data are depicted as means and standard deviations.
RESULTS
IFN-γ and TNF-α perform critical protective functions during cell-mediated defense against lethal pulmonary Y. pestis challenge.
We previously reported that active vaccination with live Y. pestis primes T cells that protect B-cell-deficient μMT mice against lethal pulmonary challenge (29). We hypothesized that IFN-γ and TNF-α may contribute to this protective response, since these cytokines are produced by T cells and their exogenous administration protects naïve mice against lethal systemic Y. pestis challenge (28). To investigate functional roles of IFN-γ and TNF-α in a pulmonary challenge model, we actively vaccinated μMT mice and administered neutralizing MAbs specific for either IFN-γ or TNF-α at the time of challenge. As shown in Fig. 1, vaccinated mice treated with either IFN-γ- or TNF-α-specific MAbs exhibited significantly reduced survival in comparison with vaccinated animals that received isotype-matched control MAb (P < 0.0001). We conclude that both IFN-γ and TNF-α perform critical protective functions during cell-mediated protection against lethal pulmonary challenge.
To investigate how IFN-γ and TNF-α contribute to protection, we examined bacterial growth in the lungs, livers, and spleens of the vaccinated mice. At day 3 postchallenge, we recovered significantly decreased numbers of CFU from the lungs of actively vaccinated mice compared with those of sham-vaccinated controls (Fig. 2A; P < 0.0001). Neutralization of IFN-γ or TNF-α abrogated this vaccination-induced suppression of pulmonary bacterial growth (Fig. 2A; P = 0.02 and P < 0.0005, respectively). We also recovered significantly decreased numbers of CFU from the livers of actively vaccinated mice (Fig. 2B; P < 0.0001), and again, neutralization of either IFN-γ or TNF-α abrogated the vaccination-induced suppression of bacterial growth (Fig. 2B; P = 0.03 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The recovery of CFU from the spleens was similar to that of the livers (data not shown). These data suggest that IFN-γ and TNF-α protect against lethal pulmonary infection in actively vaccinated mice by reducing both the pulmonary and extrapulmonary bacterial burden.
In other bacterial infection models, IFN-γ and TNF-α mediate protection, in part, via their capacities to upregulate NOS2 expression (24). To investigate the role of NOS2 in our active vaccination protocol, we measured levels of pulmonary NOS2 mRNA at day 3 postchallenge. We found that vaccinated mice, compared with sham-vaccinated controls, exhibited significantly increased levels of NOS2 mRNA (Fig. 2C, P = 0.006). Depletion of either IFN-γ or TNF-α at the time of challenge significantly suppressed the vaccination-induced upregulation of NOS2 mRNA (P = 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). These results suggest that upregulation of NOS2 expression is one mechanism by which cell-mediated immunity combats lethal pulmonary Y. pestis challenge.
IFN-γ, TNF-α, and NOS2 perform critical protective functions during passive humoral defense against lethal pulmonary Y. pestis challenge.
Having defined an important role for classical mediators of cellular immunity during protection conferred by active vaccination, we next investigated whether these mediators also participate in protection conferred by passive serotherapy. The passive transfer of convalescent-phase sera protects naïve wild-type mice against lethal pulmonary Y. pestis infection, even when administered 18 h after challenge (29). As shown in Fig. 3A, both serotherapy-treated and untreated mice exhibit similar and gradually decreasing numbers of recoverable pulmonary CFU up until day 3 postchallenge. Pulmonary CFU then continue to gradually decline in the serotherapy-treated mice and fall below the detection limit of our assay on day 9 postchallenge. By contrast, the number of recoverable pulmonary CFU steadily increases in the untreated mice, which become moribund by day 5 postchallenge. We observed similar patterns of growth in the liver, except that differences between treated and untreated mice became evident by day 3 postchallenge (Fig. 3B). We conclude that passive serotherapy promotes a gradual reduction in the bacterial burden in both the lung and extrapulmonary tissues.
To investigate the roles of key mediators of cellular immunity during protection conferred by passive serotherapy, we administered convalescent-phase sera to either gene-targeted IFN-γR-deficient or TNF-α-deficient mice. In comparison with wild-type mice, both IFN-γR-deficient mice and TNF-α-deficient mice exhibited significantly reduced survival (Fig. 4; P < 0.0001). We conclude that the type 1 cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α both contribute to protection conferred by passive serotherapy during pulmonary Y. pestis challenge.
To investigate how IFN-γ and TNF-α contribute to protection conferred by passive serotherapy, we determined the numbers of bacterial CFU in challenged mice. Specifically, we determined the numbers of CFU in lungs, livers, and spleens at 18, 48, and 96 h postchallenge. At 18 h postchallenge, the time of serotherapy administration, TNF-α-deficient mice already displayed a modest increase in pulmonary bacterial burden compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 5A; P = 0.01). At 48 h postchallenge, both IFN-γR deficiency and TNF-α deficiency significantly increased the bacterial burden in both the lung and liver (Fig. 5; P < 0.05 for both organs). These increases were even more pronounced at 96 h postchallenge (Fig. 5; P < 0.001 for both organs). Bacterial growth in the spleen resembled that shown for the liver (not shown). We conclude that abrogating either IFN-γ or TNF-α signaling suppresses the capacity of passive serotherapy to limit bacterial growth in both pulmonary and extrapulmonary tissues.
Having demonstrated important roles for IFN-γ and TNF-α during protection conferred by passive serotherapy, we next investigated the role of NOS2. As shown in Fig. 6, we found that passive serotherapy provided NOS2-deficient mice with significantly less protection than wild-type mice (Fig. 6; P <0.0001). We conclude that IFN-γ, TNF-α, and NOS2, key mediators of cellular immunity, all play critical roles during humoral defense against pulmonary Y. pestis challenge.
DISCUSSION
We previously demonstrated that vaccinating B-cell-deficient μMT mice with live Y. pestis primes T cells that protect against lethal pulmonary challenge (29). Here, we demonstrated that this cell-mediated protection requires two type 1 cytokines, IFN-γ and TNF-α. In the absence of either cytokine, actively vaccinated μMT mice exhibit significantly increased bacterial burden and acutely succumb to challenge infection. Prior studies have documented the roles of IFN-γ and TNF-α in the clearance of facultative intracellular pathogens, including other yersinia species (2, 3). With regard to Y. pestis, Nakajima and Brubaker first documented the protective roles of IFN-γ and TNF-α by demonstrating that their parenteral administration confers naïve mice with significant protection against intravenous Y. pestis challenge (28). Subsequently, Elvin and Williamson reported that STAT4-deficient mice vaccinated with F1 and V produce high-titer antibodies but, nevertheless, succumb to subcutaneous Y. pestis challenge (8). That finding suggested that type 1 cytokines may contribute to vaccine-mediated protection because STAT4 deficiency is known to impair the generation of type 1 responses (18, 38). In this report, we decisively demonstrated the critical roles of specific key elements of type 1 cellular immunity during vaccine-mediated defense against pulmonary Y. pestis challenge.
IFN-γ contributes to antimicrobial defense via a number of distinct mechanisms (35), including the upregulation of NOS2 expression by macrophages, a process that results in the production of nitric oxide and subsequent killing of intracellular organisms (24). In the presence of IFN-γ, TNF-α further upregulates macrophage NOS2 expression (24). We observed increased NOS2 expression in actively vaccinated μMT mice and found that depletion of either IFN-γ or TNF-α suppressed this upregulation. Notably, Pujol and colleagues recently demonstrated that Y. pestis organisms possess mechanisms that suppress their intracellular killing by nitric oxide (33). Together, these observations suggest that nitric oxide is detrimental to Y. pestis and that upregulation of NOS2 expression is one mechanism by which the type 1 cytokines contribute to cell-mediated defense against pulmonary Y. pestis challenge.
Researchers developing plague subunit vaccines have primarily aimed at eliciting protective humoral responses, in part because the passive transfer of specific antibodies suffices to protect mice against lethal pulmonary Y. pestis challenge (10, 25). We too found that passive serotherapy suffices to protect against pulmonary challenge. However, we subsequently observed that passive serotherapy largely fails to protect IFN-γR-, TNF-α-, and NOS2-deficient mice. These findings reveal a previously unappreciated dependency of humoral immunity on cellular immune mechanisms during defense against pulmonary Y. pestis challenge. Notably, a similar dependency has also been documented for another facultative intracellular pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans, where IFN-γ and NOS2 perform critical protective functions during antibody-mediated defense (5).
How might cellular immunity contribute to humoral defense against pulmonary Y. pestis challenge? While pathogenic roles for intracellular Y. pestis organisms have yet to be demonstrated during plague, viable Y. pestis organisms are found within macrophages in vivo (6, 22) and Y. pestis can survive and replicate within macrophages in vitro (15, 33, 37). As such, classical cell-mediated immune mechanisms may aid humoral defense by eradicating intracellular Y. pestis reservoirs. At the same time, classical humoral immune mechanisms could directly combat extracellular Y. pestis organisms and simultaneously aid cell-mediated immunity both by neutralizing Y. pestis virulence factors that dampen cellular responses (4, 28) and by delivering antibody/antigen complexes to B cells, macrophages, and/or dendritic cells, thereby promoting T-cell activation (5, 13, 27, 40). While cell-mediated clearance of intracellular bacteria may be key to humoral defense against pulmonary Y. pestis infection, our observations do not, in and of themselves, establish pathogenic roles for intracellular bacteria. Indeed, extracellular organisms dominate pulmonary Y. pestis infection (21), and a recent study found that humoral defense against Bordetella bronchioseptica, an extracellular bacterium, also requires IFN-γ (31). Thus, further studies will be required to determine whether cellular immunity aids humoral defense by eradicating intracellular Y. pestis reservoirs and/or by helping to clear extracellular organisms. To our knowledge, specific mechanisms by which cellular immunity aids humoral defense against extracellular bacteria have yet to be established in vivo. However, one likely possibility is that type 1 cytokines activate and/or recruit phagocytes, thereby enhancing their capacity to capture and destroy opsonized bacteria (7).
In conclusion, we have shown herein that IFN-γ, TNF-α, and NOS2, factors classically associated with cell-mediated defense against intracellular pathogens, play important protective roles during humoral defense against lethal pulmonary Y. pestis challenge. These observations strongly suggest that pneumonic plague vaccines should be designed to maximally prime both cellular and humoral immunity.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by PHS grants AI061577 (S.T.S.) and AI062012 (M.A.P.) and funds from Trudeau Institute.
We thank Debbie Duso for technical assistance, Seth Blumerman and Lawrence Johnson for helpful discussions, and the employees of the Trudeau animal facilities for dedicated care of the mice used in these studies.
Editor: D. L. Burns
REFERENCES
- 1.Anderson, G. W., Jr., D. G. Heath, C. R. Bolt, S. L. Welkos, and A. M. Friedlander. 1998. Short- and long-term efficacy of single-dose subunit vaccines against Yersinia pestis in mice. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 58:793-799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Autenrieth, I. B., M. Beer, E. Bohn, S. H. Kaufmann, and J. Heesemann. 1994. Immune responses to Yersinia enterocolitica in susceptible BALB/c and resistant C57BL/6 mice: an essential role for gamma interferon. Infect. Immun. 62:2590-2599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Autenrieth, I. B., and J. Heesemann. 1992. In vivo neutralization of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma abrogates resistance to Yersinia enterocolitica infection in mice. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. (Berlin) 181:333-338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brubaker, R. R. 2003. Interleukin-10 and inhibition of innate immunity to yersiniae: roles of Yops and LcrV (V antigen). Infect. Immun. 71:3673-3681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Casadevall, A., and L. Pirofski. 2005. Insights into mechanisms of antibody-mediated immunity from studies with Cryptococcus neoformans. Curr. Mol. Med. 5:421-433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cavanaugh, D. C., and R. Randall. 1959. The role of multiplication of Pasteurella pestis in mononuclear phagocytes in the pathogenesis of flea-borne plague. J. Immunol. 83:348-363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ellis, T. N., and B. L. Beaman. 2004. Interferon-gamma activation of polymorphonuclear neutrophil function. Immunology 112:2-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Elvin, S. J., and E. D. Williamson. 2004. Stat 4 but not Stat 6 mediated immune mechanisms are essential in protection against plague. Microb. Pathog. 37:177-184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Galimand, M., A. Guiyoule, G. Gerbaud, B. Rasoamanana, S. Chanteau, E. Carniel, and P. Courvalin. 1997. Multidrug resistance in Yersinia pestis mediated by a transferable plasmid. N. Engl. J. Med. 337:677-680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Green, M., D. Rogers, P. Russell, A. J. Stagg, D. L. Bell, S. M. Eley, R. W. Titball, and E. D. Williamson. 1999. The SCID/Beige mouse as a model to investigate protection against Yersinia pestis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 23:107-113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heath, D. G., G. W. Anderson, Jr., J. M. Mauro, S. L. Welkos, G. P. Andrews, J. Adamovicz, and A. M. Friedlander. 1998. Protection against experimental bubonic and pneumonic plague by a recombinant capsular F1-V antigen fusion protein vaccine. Vaccine 16:1131-1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Heath, D. G., G. W. Anderson, Jr., S. L. Welkos, G. P. Andrews, A. M. Friedlander, and J. M. Mauro. 1997. A recombinant capsular F1-V antigen fusion protein vaccine protects against experimental bubonic and pneumonic plague. Vaccines (Cold Spring Harbor) 97:197-200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Igietseme, J. U., F. O. Eko, Q. He, and C. M. Black. 2004. Antibody regulation of T cell immunity: implications for vaccine strategies against intracellular pathogens. Expert Rev. Vaccines 3:23-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Inglesby, T. V., D. T. Dennis, D. A. Henderson, J. G. Bartlett, M. S. Ascher, E. Eitzen, A. D. Fine, A. M. Friedlander, J. Hauer, J. F. Koerner, M. Layton, J. McDade, M. T. Osterholm, T. O'Toole, G. Parker, T. M. Perl, P. K. Russell, M. Schoch-Spana, and K. Tonat for the Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. 2000. Plague as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 283:2281-2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Janssen, W. A., and M. J. Surgalla. 1969. Plague bacillus: survival within host phagocytes. Science 163:950-952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jawetz, E., and K. F. Meyer. 1943. Avirulent strains of Pasteurella pestis. J. Infect. Dis. 73:124-143. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Johnson, L. L., K. N. Berggren, F. M. Szaba, W. Chen, and S. T. Smiley. 2003. Fibrin-mediated protection against infection-stimulated immunopathology. J. Exp. Med. 197:801-806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kaplan, M. H., Y. L. Sun, T. Hoey, and M. J. Grusby. 1996. Impaired IL-12 responses and enhanced development of Th2 cells in Stat4-deficient mice. Nature 382:174-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kerksiek, K. M., and E. G. Pamer. 1999. T cell responses to bacterial infection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:400-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lahteenmaki, K., R. Virkola, A. Saren, L. Emody, and T. K. Korhonen. 1998. Expression of plasminogen activator Pla of Yersinia pestis enhances bacterial attachment to the mammalian extracellular matrix. Infect. Immun. 66:5755-5762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lathem, W. W., S. D. Crosby, V. L. Miller, and W. E. Goldman. 2005. Progression of primary pneumonic plague: a mouse model of infection, pathology, and bacterial transcriptional activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:17786-17791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lukaszewski, R. A., D. J. Kenny, R. Taylor, D. G. Rees, M. G. Hartley, and P. C. Oyston. 2005. Pathogenesis of Yersinia pestis infection in BALB/c mice: effects on host macrophages and neutrophils. Infect. Immun. 73:7142-7150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ma, X. 2001. TNF-alpha and IL-12: a balancing act in macrophage functioning. Microbes Infect. 3:121-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.MacMicking, J., Q. W. Xie, and C. Nathan. 1997. Nitric oxide and macrophage function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15:323-350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meyer, K. F. 1950. Immunity in plague: a critical consideration of some recent studies. J. Immunol. 64:139-163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Meyer, K. F., D. C. Cavanaugh, P. J. Bartelloni, and J. D. Marshall, Jr. 1974. Plague immunization. I. Past and present trends. J. Infect. Dis. 129(Suppl.):S13-S18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moore, T., C. O. Ekworomadu, F. O. Eko, L. MacMillan, K. Ramey, G. A. Ananaba, J. W. Patrickson, P. R. Nagappan, D. Lyn, C. M. Black, and J. U. Igietseme. 2003. Fc receptor-mediated antibody regulation of T cell immunity against intracellular pathogens. J. Infect. Dis. 188:617-624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nakajima, R., and R. R. Brubaker. 1993. Association between virulence of Yersinia pestis and suppression of gamma interferon and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Infect. Immun. 61:23-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parent, M. A., K. N. Berggren, L. W. Kummer, L. B. Wilhelm, F. M. Szaba, I. K. Mullarky, and S. T. Smiley. 2005. Cell-mediated protection against pulmonary Yersinia pestis infection. Infect. Immun. 73:7304-7310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Perry, R. D., and J. D. Fetherston. 1997. Yersinia pestis—etiologic agent of plague. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:35-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pilione, M. R., and E. T. Harvill. 2006. The Bordetella bronchiseptica type III secretion system inhibits gamma interferon production that is required for efficient antibody-mediated bacterial clearance. Infect. Immun. 74:1043-1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pitt, M. L. 2004. Non-human primates as a model for pneumonic plague. Presented at the Animals Models and Correlates of Protection for Plague Vaccines Workshop, Gaithersburg, Md., 13 to 14 October 2004.
- 33.Pujol, C., J. P. Grabenstein, R. D. Perry, and J. B. Bliska. 2005. Replication of Yersinia pestis in interferon gamma-activated macrophages requires ripA, a gene encoded in the pigmentation locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:12909-12914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reed, L. J., and H. Muench. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 27:493-497. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schroder, K., P. J. Hertzog, T. Ravasi, and D. A. Hume. 2004. Interferon-gamma: an overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J. Leukoc. Biol. 75:163-189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Smiley, S. T., P. A. Lanthier, K. N. Couper, F. M. Szaba, J. E. Boyson, W. Chen, and L. L. Johnson. 2005. Exacerbated susceptibility to infection-stimulated immunopathology in CD1d-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 174:7904-7911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Straley, S. C., and P. A. Harmon. 1984. Yersinia pestis grows within phagolysosomes in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Infect. Immun. 45:655-659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Thierfelder, W. E., J. M. van Deursen, K. Yamamoto, R. A. Tripp, S. R. Sarawar, R. T. Carson, M. Y. Sangster, D. A. Vignali, P. C. Doherty, G. C. Grosveld, and J. N. Ihle. 1996. Requirement for Stat4 in interleukin-12-mediated responses of natural killer and T cells. Nature 382:171-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Titball, R. W., and E. D. Williamson. 2004. Yersinia pestis (plague) vaccines. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 4:965-973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Woelbing, F., S. L. Kostka, K. Moelle, Y. Belkaid, C. Sunderkoetter, S. Verbeek, A. Waisman, A. P. Nigg, J. Knop, M. C. Udey, and E. von Stebut. 2006. Uptake of Leishmania major by dendritic cells is mediated by Fcγ receptors and facilitates acquisition of protective immunity. J. Exp. Med. 203:177-188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]