The anthrax events of 2001 accentuated challenges faced by public health with existing electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) mechanisms. Clinical, state, and federal laboratories need a standing network for electronic data exchange. ELR technology was developed for the national Laboratory Response Network member laboratories to allow standardized reporting between facilities. Implementation and use of critical software, hardware, and processes before a bioterrorism event can prevent delays in dissemination of information and data to decision makers.
. 2003;2003:795.
Laboratory Response Network – Electronic Laboratory Reporting (ELR)
David A Bray
1, Tim Morris
2, Ivan Fleet
3, Richard B Kellogg
4, J Michael Miller
5
David A Bray, MCSD
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Find articles by David A Bray
Richard B Kellogg, MS
4Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Find articles by Richard B Kellogg
J Michael Miller, Ph.D, (D)ABMM
5Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Find articles by J Michael Miller
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
2Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
3Northrop-Grumman, Atlanta, GA
4Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
5Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose.
PMCID: PMC1480313
