Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1984 May 15;130(10):1311–1315.

Prenatal risk assessment and obstetric care in a small rural hospital: comparison with guidelines.

R I Casson, E S Sennett
PMCID: PMC1483523  PMID: 6722695

Abstract

An assessment was made of the potential usefulness in a small rural hospital of the guidelines for prenatal risk assessment and management of the Newfoundland and Labrador Prenatal Record, a form similar to that in use in other provinces. A retrospective chart review was done for 266 pregnancies followed at the Baie Verte Peninsula Health Centre prior to the introduction of the guidelines. The pattern of practice was to request consultation and to transfer patients for delivery less often than was suggested by the guidelines; only 32% of patients at risk were assessed by an obstetrician. By the time of delivery only 39% of the patients were at no predictable risk according to the guidelines. Nevertheless, neonatal morbidity was present in this group (4% of the infants had an Apgar score of 6 or less at 1 or 5 minutes), though less often than in those at risk (18% of the infants had a low Apgar score). However, the group at no predictable risk required nonelective intervention in 40% of cases, approximately the same rate as that for the group at risk. It is necessary for some small hospitals to have the facilities and the trained staff to handle the problems that occur even in low-risk patients. To maintain the delivery rate necessary to retain skills, the guidelines may help family practitioners and consulting obstetricians to select some patients at risk who can be managed in small hospitals.

Full text

PDF
1311

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baskett T. F. Obstetric care in the central Canadian Arctic. Br Med J. 1978 Oct 7;2(6143):1001–1004. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6143.1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birch J. A. Medical audit. General practitioner obstetrics in a small rural hospital. N Z Med J. 1981 Feb 25;93(678):126–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Black D. P., Gick S. Management of obstetric complications at a small rural hospital. Can Med Assoc J. 1979 Jan 6;120(1):31–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bull M. J. Ten years' experience in a general practice obstetric unit. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Apr;30(213):208–215. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coopland A. T., Peddle L. J., Baskett T. F., Rollwagen R., Simpson A., Parker E. A simplified antepartum high-risk pregnancy scoring form: statistical analysis of 5459 cases. Can Med Assoc J. 1977 May 7;116(9):999–1001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cox C. A., Fox S. S., Zinkin P. M., Matthews A. E. Critical appraisal of domiciliary obstetric and neonatal practice. Br Med J. 1976 Jan 10;1(6001):84–86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6001.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Curzen P., Mountrose U. M. The general practitioner's role in the management of labour. Br Med J. 1976 Dec 11;2(6049):1433–1434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6049.1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodwin J. W., Dunne J. T., Thomas B. W. Antepartum identification of the fetus at risk. Can Med Assoc J. 1969 Oct 18;101(8):57–passim. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hein H. A., Christopher M. C., Ferguson N. N. Rural perinatology. Pediatrics. 1975 Jun;55(6):769–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hein H. A., Ferguson N. N. The cost of maternity care in rural hospitals. JAMA. 1978 Nov 3;240(19):2051–2052. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hobel C. J. Risk assessment in perinatal medicine. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jun;21(2):287–295. doi: 10.1097/00003081-197806000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klein M., Lloyd I., Redman C., Bull M., Turnbull A. C. A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):118–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08894.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lesinski High-risk pregnancy. Unresolved problems of screening, management, and prognosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Nov;46(5):599–603. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lewins M. J., Whitfield J. M., Chance G. W. Neonatal respiratory distress: potential for prevention. Can Med Assoc J. 1979 May 5;120(9):1076–1080. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marsh G. N. Obstetric audit in general practice. Br Med J. 1977 Oct 15;2(6093):1004–1006. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6093.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Merenstein G. B., Pettett G., Woodall J., Hill J. M. An analysis of air transport results in the sick newborn II. Antenatal and neonatal referrals. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jul 1;128(5):520–525. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Murdock A. I. Factors associated with high-risk pregnancies in Canadian Inuit. Can Med Assoc J. 1979 Feb 3;120(3):291–294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peddle L. J., Brown H., Buckley J., Dixon W., Kaye J., Muise M., Rees E., Woodhams W., Young C. Voluntary regionalization and associated trends in perinatal care: the Nova Scotia Reproductive Care Program. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Jan 15;145(2):170–176. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90485-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Richards T. A., Richards J. L. A comparison of cesarean section morbidity in urban and rural hospitals. A three-year retrospective review of 1,177 charts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Oct 1;144(3):270–275. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90578-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ryan G. M., Jr Toward improving the outcome of pregnancy Recommendations for the regional development of perinatal health services. Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Oct;46(4):375–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Salisbury A. J. Progress in "regionalization" of perinatal care. Clin Perinatol. 1976 Sep;3(2):267–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shapland D. E. Extended role for general practitioners in obstetrics? A medical audit. Br Med J. 1979 May 5;1(6172):1199–1200. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6172.1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Taylor G. W., Edgar W., Taylor B. A., Neal D. G. How safe is general practitioner obstetrics? Lancet. 1980 Dec 13;2(8207):1287–1289. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92348-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. White P. Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. Clin Perinatol. 1974 Sep;1(2):331–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wood L. A. Obstetric retrospect. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Feb;31(223):80–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yeh S. Y., Forsythe A., Lowensohn R. I., Hon E. H. A study of the relationship between Goodwin's high-risk score and fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Jan 1;127(1):50–55. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90313-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES