Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1993 Jun 1;148(11):1921–1926.

Alberta euthanasia survey: 1. Physicians' opinions about the morality and legalization of active euthanasia.

T D Kinsella 1, M J Verhoef 1
PMCID: PMC1485840  PMID: 8500029

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the opinions of a sample of Alberta physicians about the morality and legalization of active euthanasia, the determinants of these opinions and the frequency and sources of requests for assistance in active euthanasia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of a random sample of Alberta physicians, grouped by site and type of practice. SETTING: Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2002 (46%) of the licensed physicians in Alberta were mailed a 38-item questionnaire in May through July 1991; usable responses were returned by 1391 (69%). RESULTS: Of the respondents 44% did believe that it is sometimes right to practice active euthanasia; 46% did not. Moral acceptance of active euthanasia correlated with type of practice and religious affiliation and activity. In all, 28% of the physicians stated that they would practice active euthanasia if it were legalized, and 51% indicated that they would not. These opinions were significantly related to sex, religious affiliation and activity, and country of graduation. Just over half (51%) of the respondents stated that the law should be changed to permit patients to request active euthanasia. Requests (usually from patients) were reportedly received by 19% of the physicians, 78% of whom received fewer than five. CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed severely disparate opinions among Alberta physicians about the morality of active euthanasia. In particular, religious affiliation and activity were associated with the polarized opinions. The desire for active euthanasia, as inferred from requests by patients, was not frequent. Overall, there was no strong support expressed by the physicians for the personal practice of legalized active euthanasia. These data will be vital to those involved in health education and public policy formation about active euthanasia in Alberta and the rest of Canada.

Full text

PDF
1921

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Angell M. Euthanasia. N Engl J Med. 1988 Nov 17;319(20):1348–1350. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198811173192010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Callahan D. Mercy, murder, & morality: perspectives on euthanasia. Can we return death to disease? Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Jan-Feb;19(1):suppl–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassel C. K., Meier D. E. Morals and moralism in the debate over euthanasia and assisted suicide. N Engl J Med. 1990 Sep 13;323(11):750–752. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199009133231110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuhse H., Singer P. Doctors' practices and attitudes regarding voluntary euthanasia. Med J Aust. 1988 Jun 20;148(12):623–627. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb116334.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maheux B., Legault C., Lambert J. Increasing response rates in physicians' mail surveys: an experimental study. Am J Public Health. 1989 May;79(5):638–639. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.5.638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Singer P. A., Siegler M. Euthanasia--a critique. N Engl J Med. 1990 Jun 28;322(26):1881–1883. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006283222610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Der Maas P. J., Van Delden J. J., Pijnenborg L., Looman C. W. Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. Lancet. 1991 Sep 14;338(8768):669–674. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91241-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. de Wachter M. A. The Dutch & the dying. Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Nov-Dec;21(6):2–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES