Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1994 Feb 1;150(3):345–352.

Variation in breast cancer surgery in Ontario.

N A Iscoe 1, V Goel 1, K Wu 1, G Fehringer 1, E J Holowaty 1, C D Naylor 1
PMCID: PMC1486167  PMID: 8293375

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the extent of variation by county and hospital in the use of breast-conserving surgery in the initial management of breast cancer and to assess some factors that might explain the observed variation. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Ontario. PATIENTS: All women with breast cancer newly diagnosed from Jan. 1, 1989, to Dec. 31, 1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of women undergoing unilateral breast cancer surgery who had breast-conserving surgery in each hospital and county. RESULTS: Of the 14,570 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer 12,815 (88.0%) underwent unilateral breast cancer surgery. The mean proportion of breast-conserving procedures by county was 52% and ranged from 11% to 84%. The proportion of breast-conserving procedures in individual hospitals with one or more cases of breast cancer per month ranged from 6% to 84%. The variations in the rates between hospitals was greater than that expected by chance alone (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There was marked variation at the hospital and county level in the use of breast-conserving surgery in the initial management of breast cancer. This variation was strongly associated with the hospital where the surgery was performed.

Full text

PDF
345

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clarke E. A., Marrett L. D., Kreiger N. Cancer registration in Ontario: a computer approach. IARC Sci Publ. 1991;(95):246–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Farrow D. C., Hunt W. C., Samet J. M. Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992 Apr 23;326(17):1097–1101. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199204233261701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisher B., Bauer M., Margolese R., Poisson R., Pilch Y., Redmond C., Fisher E., Wolmark N., Deutsch M., Montague E. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985 Mar 14;312(11):665–673. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198503143121101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Leape L. L., Park R. E., Solomon D. H., Chassin M. R., Kosecoff J., Brook R. H. Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services? JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):669–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lomas J., Anderson G. M., Domnick-Pierre K., Vayda E., Enkin M. W., Hannah W. J. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 9;321(19):1306–1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911093211906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES