Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1994 Apr 15;150(8):1265–1270.

Hospital policies on life-sustaining treatments and advance directives in Canada.

I Rasooly 1, J V Lavery 1, S Urowitz 1, S Choudhry 1, N Seeman 1, E M Meslin 1, F H Lowy 1, P A Singer 1
PMCID: PMC1486449  PMID: 8162549

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and content of hospital policies on life-sustaining treatments (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], mechanical ventilation, dialysis, artificial nutrition and hydration, and antibiotic therapy for life-threatening infections) and advance directives in Canada. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey. SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Chief executive officers or their designates at public general hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Information regarding the existence of policies on life-sustaining treatments or advance directives and the content of the policies. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed for 697 (79.2%) of the 880 hospitals surveyed. Of the 697 respondents 362 (51.9%) sent 388 policies; 355 (50.9%) sent do-not-resuscitate (DNR) policies (i.e., policies that addressed CPR alone or in combination with other life-sustaining treatments). Of the 388 policies 327 (84.3%) addressed CPR alone, 28 (7.2%) addressed CPR plus other life-sustaining treatments, 10 (2.6%) addressed advance directives, and the remaining 23 (5.9%) addressed other life-sustaining treatments. Of the 355 DNR policies 1 (0.3%) stated that routine discussion with patients is required, 315 (88.7%) restricted their scope to terminally or hopelessly ill patients, 187 (52.7%) mentioned futility, 29 (8.2%) mentioned conflict resolution, 9 (2.5%) and 13 (3.7%) required explicit communication of the decision to the competent patient or family of the incompetent patient respectively, 110 (31.0%) authorized the family of an incompetent patient to rescind the DNR order, 224 (63.1%) authorized the nursing staff to do so, and 217 (61.1%) authorized physicians to do so. CONCLUSIONS: Although about half of the public general hospitals surveyed had DNR policies few had policies regarding other life-sustaining treatments or advance directives. Existing policies could be improved if hospitals encouraged routine advance discussions, removed the restriction to terminally or hopelessly ill patients, scrutinized the use of the futility standard, stipulated procedures for conflict resolution, explicitly required communication of the decision to competent patients or substitute decision-makers of incompetent patients and scrutinized the provision allowing families and health care professionals to rescind the wishes of now incompetent patients.

Full text

PDF
1265

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alemayehu E., Molloy D. W., Guyatt G. H., Singer J., Penington G., Basile J., Eisemann M., Finucane P., McMurdo M. E., Powell C. Variability in physicians' decisions on caring for chronically ill elderly patients: an international study. CMAJ. 1991 May 1;144(9):1133–1138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Angell M. Respecting the autonomy of competent patients. N Engl J Med. 1984 Apr 26;310(17):1115–1116. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198404263101710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angell M. The case of Helga Wanglie. A new kind of "right to die" case. N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 15;325(7):511–512. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Callahan D. Medical futility, medical necessity. The-problem-without-a-name. Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Jul-Aug;21(4):30–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fish A., Singer P. A. Nancy B.: the criminal code and decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment. CMAJ. 1992 Sep 1;147(5):637–642. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hughes D. L., Singer P. A. Family physicians' attitudes toward advance directives. CMAJ. 1992 Jun 1;146(11):1937–1944. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kelner M., Bourgeault I. L., Hébert P. C., Dunn E. V. Advance directives: the views of health care professionals. CMAJ. 1993 Apr 15;148(8):1331–1338. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lantos J. D., Singer P. A., Walker R. M., Gramelspacher G. P., Shapiro G. R., Sanchez-Gonzalez M. A., Stocking C. B., Miles S. H., Siegler M. The illusion of futility in clinical practice. Am J Med. 1989 Jul;87(1):81–84. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(89)80487-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Levinson W., Shepard M. A., Dunn P. M., Parker D. F. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in long-term care facilities: a survey of do-not-resuscitate orders in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987 Dec;35(12):1059–1062. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1987.tb04921.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McCrary S. V., Botkin J. R. Hospital policy on advance directives. Do institutions ask patients about living wills? JAMA. 1989 Nov 3;262(17):2411–2414. doi: 10.1001/jama.262.17.2411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miles S. H., Moldow D. G. The prevalence and design of hospital protocols limiting medical treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1984 Sep;144(9):1841–1843. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miles S. H., Ryden M. B. Limited-treatment policies in long-term care facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985 Oct;33(10):707–711. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb01780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miles S. H., Singer P. A., Siegler M. Conflicts between patients' wishes to forgo treatment and the policies of health care facilities. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jul 6;321(1):48–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198907063210110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Molloy David W., Guyatt Gordon, Alemayehu Efrem, McIlroy William E. Treatment preferences, attitudes toward advance directives and concerns about health care. Humane Med. 1991 Oct;7(4):285–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paris J. J., Schreiber M. D., Statter M., Arensman R., Siegler M. Beyond autonomy--physicians' refusal to use life-prolonging extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 29;329(5):354–357. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307293290512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sam M., Singer P. A. Canadian outpatients and advance directives: poor knowledge and little experience but positive attitudes. CMAJ. 1993 May 1;148(9):1497–1502. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schneiderman L. J., Jecker N. S., Jonsen A. R. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jun 15;112(12):949–954. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-12-949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sehgal A., Galbraith A., Chesney M., Schoenfeld P., Charles G., Lo B. How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed? JAMA. 1992 Jan 1;267(1):59–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Singer P. A., Choudhry S., Armstrong J. Public opinion regarding consent to treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Feb;41(2):112–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb02042.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Youngner S. J. Who defines futility? JAMA. 1988 Oct 14;260(14):2094–2095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES