Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
editorial
. 1994 Apr 15;150(8):1211–1222.

Information for peer reviewers.

P Huston
PMCID: PMC1486480  PMID: 8162544

Full text

PDF
1211

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailar J. C., 3rd, Patterson K. The need for a research agenda. N Engl J Med. 1985 Mar 7;312(10):654–657. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198503073121023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailar J. C., 3rd, Patterson K. The need for a research agenda. N Engl J Med. 1985 Mar 7;312(10):654–657. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198503073121023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cullen D. J., Macaulay A. Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal. Acad Med. 1992 Dec;67(12):856–859. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199212000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cullen D. J., Macaulay A. Consistency between peer reviewers for a clinical specialty journal. Acad Med. 1992 Dec;67(12):856–859. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199212000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Bellefeuille C., Morrison C. A., Tannock I. F. The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication. Ann Oncol. 1992 Mar;3(3):187–191. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Bellefeuille C., Morrison C. A., Tannock I. F. The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication. Ann Oncol. 1992 Mar;3(3):187–191. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1385–1389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1385–1389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Engler R. L., Covell J. W., Friedman P. J., Kitcher P. S., Peters R. M. Misrepresentation and responsibility in medical research. N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 26;317(22):1383–1389. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711263172205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Engler R. L., Covell J. W., Friedman P. J., Kitcher P. S., Peters R. M. Misrepresentation and responsibility in medical research. N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 26;317(22):1383–1389. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711263172205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans J. T., Nadjari H. I., Burchell S. A. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1353–1354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans J. T., Nadjari H. I., Burchell S. A. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1353–1354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fletcher R. H., Fletcher S. W. Medical journals and society: threats and responsibilities. J Intern Med. 1992 Sep;232(3):215–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fletcher R. H., Fletcher S. W. Medical journals and society: threats and responsibilities. J Intern Med. 1992 Sep;232(3):215–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fletcher S. W., Fletcher R. H. Responsibilities of medical journals to readers. J Intern Med. 1992 Sep;232(3):223–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fletcher S. W., Fletcher R. H. Responsibilities of medical journals to readers. J Intern Med. 1992 Sep;232(3):223–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guyatt G. H., Sackett D. L., Cook D. J. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993 Dec 1;270(21):2598–2601. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.21.2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guyatt G. H., Sackett D. L., Cook D. J. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993 Dec 1;270(21):2598–2601. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.21.2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guyatt G. H., Sackett D. L., Cook D. J. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994 Jan 5;271(1):59–63. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guyatt G. H., Sackett D. L., Cook D. J. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994 Jan 5;271(1):59–63. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hayward R. S., Laupacis A. Initiating, conducting and maintaining guidelines development programs. CMAJ. 1993 Feb 15;148(4):507–512. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hayward R. S., Laupacis A. Initiating, conducting and maintaining guidelines development programs. CMAJ. 1993 Feb 15;148(4):507–512. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Horrobin D. F. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1438–1441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Horrobin D. F. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1438–1441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Isbister W. H. Who referees the referees? Aust N Z J Surg. 1992 Mar;62(3):173–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Isbister W. H. Who referees the referees? Aust N Z J Surg. 1992 Mar;62(3):173–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ. 1988 Apr 15;138(8):697–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ. 1988 Apr 15;138(8):697–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H., Singer J., Goldsmith C. H., Hutchison B. G., Milner R. A., Streiner D. L. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(1):91–98. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90205-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H., Singer J., Goldsmith C. H., Hutchison B. G., Milner R. A., Streiner D. L. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(1):91–98. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90205-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oxman A. D., Sackett D. L., Guyatt G. H. Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993 Nov 3;270(17):2093–2095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Oxman A. D., Sackett D. L., Guyatt G. H. Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993 Nov 3;270(17):2093–2095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Riis P. New paradigms in journalology. J Intern Med. 1992 Sep;232(3):207–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Siegelman S. S. Assassins and zealots: variations in peer review. Special report. Radiology. 1991 Mar;178(3):637–642. doi: 10.1148/radiology.178.3.1994394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Siegelman S. S. Assassins and zealots: variations in peer review. Special report. Radiology. 1991 Mar;178(3):637–642. doi: 10.1148/radiology.178.3.1994394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Smith R. Conflict of interest and the BMJ. BMJ. 1994 Jan 1;308(6920):4–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6920.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith R. Conflict of interest and the BMJ. BMJ. 1994 Jan 1;308(6920):4–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6920.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Squires B. P. Biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1989 Jul 1;141(1):17–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Squires B. P. Biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1989 Jul 1;141(1):17–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Squires B. P. Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1989 Aug 1;141(3):195–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Squires B. P. Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1989 Aug 1;141(3):195–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Squires B. P. Case reports: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1989 Sep 1;141(5):379–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Squires B. P. Case reports: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1989 Sep 1;141(5):379–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Squires B. P. Descriptive studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1989 Nov 1;141(9):879–880. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Squires B. P. Descriptive studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1989 Nov 1;141(9):879–880. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Squires B. P., Elmslie T. J. Cohort studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1990 Aug 1;143(3):179–180. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Squires B. P., Elmslie T. J. Cohort studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1990 Aug 1;143(3):179–180. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Squires B. P., Elmslie T. J. Reports of case-control studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1990 Jul 1;143(1):17–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Squires B. P., Elmslie T. J. Reports of case-control studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1990 Jul 1;143(1):17–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Squires B. P., Elmslie T. J. Reports of randomized controlled trials: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1990 Sep 1;143(5):381–382. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Squires B. P., Elmslie T. J. Reports of randomized controlled trials: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. 1990 Sep 1;143(5):381–382. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Strayhorn J., Jr, McDermott J. F., Jr, Tanguay P. An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Jun;150(6):947–952. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.6.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Strayhorn J., Jr, McDermott J. F., Jr, Tanguay P. An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Jun;150(6):947–952. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.6.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Taubes G. Misconduct: views from the trenches. Science. 1993 Aug 27;261(5125):1108–1111. doi: 10.1126/science.8356443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Taubes G. Misconduct: views from the trenches. Science. 1993 Aug 27;261(5125):1108–1111. doi: 10.1126/science.8356443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Weiss B. D., Magill M. K., Smith M. A. Family Medicine after one year. Fam Med. 1993 Jan;25(1):14–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Weiss B. D., Magill M. K., Smith M. A. Family Medicine after one year. Fam Med. 1993 Jan;25(1):14–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wennberg J. E., Fowler F. J., Jr A test of consumer contribution to small area variations in health care delivery. J Maine Med Assoc. 1977 Aug;68(8):275–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wennberg J. E., Fowler F. J., Jr A test of consumer contribution to small area variations in health care delivery. J Maine Med Assoc. 1977 Aug;68(8):275–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yankauer A. Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review? JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1338–1340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yankauer A. Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review? JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1338–1340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES