Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
editorial
. 1996 Mar 1;154(5):678–680.

Physician remuneration methods: the need for change and flexibility.

C J Wright
PMCID: PMC1487535  PMID: 8603324

Abstract

Although fee-for-service payment may create an incentive for some physicians to make inappropriate clinical decisions that will maximize income, physicians are no more prone to this kind of behaviour than other professionals. Remuneration methods do not necessarily have a predictable effect upon practice, as shown by Hutchison and associates' report in this issue (see pages 653 to 661) that the capitation system used by Health Service Organizations in Ontario has not had the intended effect of reducing hospital utilization. However, many essential activities performed by physicians do not fit in a fee-for-service system. The real challenge is to achieve flexibility and balance in any payment system to correct the prevailing gross inequities between different areas of practice and to ensure that disincentives for activities such as health promotion and health service evaluation are eliminated.

Full text

PDF
678

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blumenthal D., Epstein A. M. Physician-payment reform--unfinished business. N Engl J Med. 1992 May 14;326(20):1330–1334. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199205143262005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haslam R. H., Walker N. E. Alternative funding plans: is there a place in academic medicine? CMAJ. 1993 Apr 1;148(7):1141–1146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Iglehart J. K. Efforts to address the problem of physician self-referral. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 19;325(25):1820–1824. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112193252523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Krasnik A., Groenewegen P. P., Pedersen P. A., von Scholten P., Mooney G., Gottschau A., Flierman H. A., Damsgaard M. T. Changing remuneration systems: effects on activity in general practice. BMJ. 1990 Jun 30;300(6741):1698–1701. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6741.1698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rice T. H. The impact of changing medicare reimbursement rates on physician-induced demand. Med Care. 1983 Aug;21(8):803–815. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198308000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stearns S. C., Wolfe B. L., Kindig D. A. Physician responses to fee-for-service and capitation payment. Inquiry. 1992 Winter;29(4):416–425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES