Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1996 Apr 15;154(8):1173–1176.

Contact dermatitis associated with the use of Always sanitary napkins.

E L Eason 1, P Feldman 1
PMCID: PMC1487684  PMID: 8612252

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a clinical association between vulvar irritation or contact dermatitis and the use of Always sanitary napkins. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: A gynecology practice in Montreal. PATIENTS: Women presenting between September 1991 and September 1994 with itching or burning of areas that would be in contact with a sanitary napkin (mons pubis, external surfaces of the vulva and perineum) beginning at least 1 day after the use of the napkins was started and less than 5 days after the use was stopped. RESULTS: Twenty-eight women experienced vulvar itching and burning, often associated with eruptions resembling contact dermatitis, of the vulvar and perineal surfaces after using Always sanitary napkins. Twenty-six reported that symptoms disappeared after they stopped using that brand of sanitary napkin. Seven women who later used the same brand again reported a recurrence of the vulvar irritation. CONCLUSION: The findings of this case series reveal Always sanitary napkins as a potentially important cause of recurrent vulvitis. Physician awareness of the association will enable effective advice and relief for a large number of women suffering "chronic vaginitis".

Full text

PDF
1173

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hanke-Baier P., Johannigmann J., Levin R. J., Wagner G. Evaluation of vaginal and perineal area during the use of external sanitary protection throughout the menstrual cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Jul;73(6):486–491. doi: 10.3109/00016349409013437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Larsen W. G. Sanitary napkin dermatitis due to the perfume. Arch Dermatol. 1979 Mar;115(3):363–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pincus S. H. Vulvar dermatoses and pruritus vulvae. Dermatol Clin. 1992 Apr;10(2):297–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. St Louis J. D., Lederer J. A., Lichtman A. H. Costimulator deficient antigen presentation by an endothelial cell line induces a nonproliferative T cell activation response without anergy. J Exp Med. 1993 Nov 1;178(5):1597–1605. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.5.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sterry W., Schmoll M. Contact urticaria and dermatitis from self-adhesive pads. Contact Dermatitis. 1985 Oct;13(4):284–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES