Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
letter
. 1996 Aug 15;155(4):369.

Choose better device to treat asthma and put on a happy face.

M T Newhouse
PMCID: PMC1488050  PMID: 8752057

Full text

PDF

Page 369

369

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berenberg M. J., Baigelman W., Cupples L. A., Pearce L. Comparison of metered-dose inhaler attached to an Aerochamber with an updraft nebulizer for the administration of metaproterenol in hospitalized patients. J Asthma. 1985;22(2):87–92. doi: 10.3109/02770908509079893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowton D. L., Goldsmith W. M., Haponik E. F. Substitution of metered-dose inhalers for hand-held nebulizers. Success and cost savings in a large, acute-care hospital. Chest. 1992 Feb;101(2):305–308. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.2.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colacone A., Afilalo M., Wolkove N., Kreisman H. A comparison of albuterol administered by metered dose inhaler (and holding chamber) or wet nebulizer in acute asthma. Chest. 1993 Sep;104(3):835–841. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.3.835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Idris A. H., McDermott M. F., Raucci J. C., Morrabel A., McGorray S., Hendeles L. Emergency department treatment of severe asthma. Metered-dose inhaler plus holding chamber is equivalent in effectiveness to nebulizer. Chest. 1993 Mar;103(3):665–672. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.3.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES