Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 2006 Jul 1;333(7557):45. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7557.45

We still need artesunate monotherapy

François Nosten 1,2, Elizabeth Ashley 1,2, Rose McGready 1,2, Ric Price 1,2
PMCID: PMC1488766  PMID: 16809721

Editor—Seen from Geneva, the World Health Organization's “ultimatum” on artemisinin monotherapy may seem a landmark in prolonging the useful therapeutic life of the artemisinin derivatives,1 but for the clinicians in the field, the matter is different.

In 1991 on the Thai-Myanmar border we were facing the prospect of untreatable Plasmodium falciparum malaria as drug resistance emerged to standard antimalarial agents. The problem was circumvented by combining artesunate or artemether with mefloquine and the development of the artemisinin combination therapy strategy. Fifteen years later the same three day regimen remains our first line therapy, but we still need artesunate monotherapy.

A prime example is highlighted in patients with uncomplicated hyperparasitaemic falciparum malaria (> 4% infected red blood cells), who are at risk of severe malaria and treatment failure. These infections require a five to seven day course of treatment with oral artesunate.2 The only alternative is parenteral quinine, which is less effective, more expensive, and less well tolerated.3 In the second and third trimester of pregnancy, artesunate is also a better drug for uncomplicated falciparum malaria, but it needs to be given for seven days with a dose adjustment because of the altered kinetics in pregnant women.4,5 We currently treat patients who experience a recurrence of their parasitaemia after a three day course of mefloquine-artesunate with a seven day course of artesunate combined with tetracycline or clindamycin. Obviously we would like to prescribe appropriate antimalarial therapy without the need for artesunate tablets but this is unlikely to be possible in the near future. Hence we hope that some manufacturers will continue to supply artesunate alone to be used in specific circumstances.

After resisting the change to artemisinin combination therapies, the World Health Organization is now going to the opposite extreme. Instead, it should encourage antimalarial drug manufacturers to phase out the production of single drug tablets of mefloquine (except perhaps for intermittent preventive treatment), amodiaquine, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, atovaquone-proguanil, and chlorproguanil-dapsone because these drugs are all we have and must be protected by fixed combination with an artemisinin derivative.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Rehwagen C. WHO ultimatum on artemisinin monotherapy is showing results [news extra]. BMJ 2006; 332: 1176. (20 May.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Price R, Luxemburger C, van Vugt M, Nosten F, Kham A, Simpson J, et al. Artesunate and mefloquine in the treatment of uncomplicated multidrug-resistant hyperparasitaemic falciparum malaria. Transact R Soc Trop Med Hygiene 1998;92: 207-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Luxemburger C, Nosten F, Raimond SD, Chongsuphajaisiddhi T, White NJ. Oral artesunate in the treatment of uncomplicated hyperparasitemic falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hygiene 1995;53: 522-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McGready R, Cho T, Keo NK, Thwai KL, Villegas L, Looareesuwan S, et al. Artemisinin antimalarials in pregnancy: a prospective treatment study of 539 episodes of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33: 2009-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McGready R, Stepniewska K, Ward SA, Cho T, Gilveray G, Looareesuwan S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of dihydroartemisinin following oral artesunate treatment of pregnant women with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006;62: 367-71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES