Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2006 Jul;44(7):2333–2337. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00330-06

Mutations Prevalent among Rifampin- and Isoniazid-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from a Hospital in Vietnam

M Caws 1,*, Phan Minh Duy 1, Dau Quang Tho 1, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan 2, Dai Viet Hoa 2, Jeremy Farrar 1
PMCID: PMC1489476  PMID: 16825345

Abstract

Vietnam is ranked 13th among the WHO list of 22 high-burden countries, based upon estimated total number of tuberculosis cases. Despite having a model national tuberculosis program, consistently achieving and exceeding WHO targets for detection and cure, drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis cases continue to rise. Rapid multidrug-resistant tests applicable in this setting, coupled with effective treatment regimens, would be a useful tool in reversing this trend, allowing early identification of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and avoiding resistance-amplifying regimens. Sequencing of consecutive isolates identified by the National Tuberculosis Program showed 89% of isoniazid-resistant isolates could be detected by targeting just 2 codons, katG 315 and −15C→T in the inhA promoter, while rifampin resistance will be more complex to detect, with many different mutation and insertion events in rpoB. The most prevalent rifampin resistance-conferring mutations, as in other countries, were in rpoB codons 531 (43%), 526 (31%), and 516 (15%). However, a hybridization-based resistance test with probes targeting the 5 most common mutations would only detect 78% of rifampin-resistant isolates. Overall, these data suggest that rifampin resistance may be used as a surrogate marker for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and that a sensitivity of between 70 to 80% may be possible for rapid molecular detection of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in this setting.


Few data are available on resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Vietnam. The latest figures from the WHO are derived from the 1997 report on global drug resistance, which estimates resistance to any drug from a 1996 survey at 32.5% and multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) at 2.3% (35). The second national drug resistance survey was carried out between 2001 and 2002, but there were problems with data collection. The third survey is under way.

There are indications that the incidence of MDR TB has risen significantly since the first survey and, in the face of a rapidly increasing human immunodeficiency virus prevalence in Vietnam, is likely to continue to increase in the coming years. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) reported from a study of potential immigrants to Canada between 1989 and 2000 that the estimated MDR TB rate was approximately 4.5% (32), and data from our own studies show the rate of MDR TB in 2002 to 2004 to be approximately 6% (unpublished data).

The National Tuberculosis Program (NTP), while apparently achieving high rates of detection and cure (12), is not able to offer sensitivity testing on all isolates. Patients currently receive a standard regimen upon diagnosis of 2 months of streptomycin (S), isoniazid (H), rifampin (R), and pyrazinamide (Z), followed by 6 months of isoniazid and ethambutol (E) (2SHRZ/6HE). Following microbiological failure or relapse, there is a retreatment regimen of 2 months of streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, followed by 1 month of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol, and finally, 5 months of isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol (2SHRZE/1HRZE/5H3R3E3). A 2003 study showed that 47% of patients who failed treatment within the NTP had primary MDR TB (24), and in a separate study, only 33% of MDR TB patients were sputum smear negative upon completion of 8 months of retreatment (17).

Effective control and treatment of MDR TB will require earlier diagnosis and a change in treatment patterns to avoid potential resistance-amplifying regimens (7).

Studies have shown that the mutations responsible for drug resistance in M. tuberculosis vary geographically (22). It is not clear if this is secondary to prescribing practices, M. tuberculosis strain subtypes, or other factors.

The development of a sensitive, rapid, and economical genotypic test for MDR TB will require knowledge of the prevalent mutations among MDR TB isolates in Vietnam. This study aimed to characterize the mutations conferring resistance in 100 consecutive rifampin (RIF)-resistant isolates and 100 consecutive isoniazid (INH)-resistant isolates identified at Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital, the WHO coordinating center for the NTP in southern Vietnam.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital is a 500-bed hospital for tuberculosis and lung disease serving Ho Chi Minh City and is a tertiary referral hospital for southern Vietnam. The microbiology laboratory is a WHO international reference laboratory. Between January and March 2005, consecutive M. tuberculosis isolates identified at Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital and shown to be resistant to either RIF or INH had their relevant genes sequenced at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City. Isolates are tested in the NTP following failure of directly observed therapy-short course (DOTS) or at the request of the treating physician.

Susceptibility testing was routinely performed by the standard 1% proportion method on Lowenstein-Jensen media for INH (0.2 μg/ml), RIF (40 μg/ml), streptomycin (4 μg/ml), and ethambutol (2 μg/ml). All isolates were identified as M. tuberculosis by standard phenotypic identification tests. Data on the residential district were collected to ensure that isolates were not part of a single outbreak or from one residential district of the city (data not shown).

PCR and DNA sequencing.

For isolates resistant to rifampin, the rpoB rifampin resistance-determining region (RRDR, codons 409 to 493) was sequenced. If no mutations were found, further sequencing was done at the rpoB N-terminal (codons 111 to 200) and cluster 3 (codons 575 to 656) regions. For isoniazid-resistant isolates, a 381-bp (codons 266 to 392) region of katG was sequenced. If no mutations were seen in katG, two further regions involved in INH resistance were sequenced: the oxyR-ahpC intergenic region (codons oxyR 56 to ahpC 97) and inhA promoter region (codons −93 to 27). Primers (Proligo, Singapore) are given in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Primers for sequencing of rifampin and isoniazid resistance-determining regions

Primer (reference) Sequence (5′-3′) Ta (°C) Concn (nM) Target Product length (bp)
katGwgF1 GTC CTC TAT ACC GGA CTA CGC 61 120 katG whole gene 2,899
katGwgR1 TCG CAC ATC CAG CAC ATT TC
katGP5 GGT CGA CAT TCG CGA GAC GTT 68 katG codon 315, sequencing primers 518
katGP6 (21) CGG TGG ATC AGC TTG TAC CAG
TB92 CCT CGC TGC CCA GAA AGG GA 56 150 inhA promoter region 248
TB93 (29) ATC CCC CGG TTT CCT CCG GT
AhpC1 GCC TGG GTG TTC GTC ACT GGT 56 150 oxyR-ahpC intergenic region 359
AhpC2 (28) CGC AAC GTC GAC TGG CTC ATA
RPOBF GGG AGC GGA TGA CCA CCC A 65 125 rpoB RRDR 350
RPOBR (14) GCG GTA CGG CGT TTC GAT GAA C
TB146-F CTT CTC CGG GTC GAT GTC GTT G 64 300 rpoB N-terminal region 365
TB146-R (8) CGC GCT TGT CGA CGT CAA ACT C
RpoB-C3F GAG TAC GTG CCC TCG TCT GA 56 300 rpoB cluster 3 region 319
RpoB-C3R ACT TGC GCA TCC GGT AGG TA

PCRs for rpoB N-terminal, cluster III, oxyR-ahpC intergenic, and inhA promoter regions were performed with 0.75 U of Bioline Taq (Bioline, United Kingdom) polymerase, RRDR PCR used 0.75 U of Amersham Taq polymerase (Amersham, United Kingdom), and katG whole-gene PCR used 1.3 U of the Expand high-fidelity polymerase system (Roche, United Kingdom). Amplifications were carried out in an Eppendorf Mastercycler as follows: an initial step of 95°C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, appropriate annealing temperature (Ta) for 15 s, 72°C for 15 s, and a final step of 72°C for 2 min. katG whole-gene PCR used 2.5 min at 72°C for extension and a final step of 72°C for 7 min.

PCR products were purified with QIAgen PCR purification kits (QIAGEN, United Kingdom) and then served as templates for cycle sequencing reactions. Both strands of each product were sequenced with CEQ dye terminator cycle sequencing quick start kits (Beckman Coulter, Singapore) in a half-volume reaction using PCR primers, except for katG, which was sequenced with katGP5 and katGP6 (21). The thermal cycling program was 96°C for 20 s, appropriate Ta for 20 s, and 60°C for 4 min for 30 cycles, followed by holding at 4°C. The cycle sequencing products were subjected to ethanol precipitation steps according to the manufacturer's instructions and sequenced on the CEQ8000 system (Beckman Coulter, Singapore).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one consecutive isolates resistant to either RIF or INH were collected. Resistance patterns to first-line drugs are shown in Table 2. One hundred four isolates (79%) were RIF resistant; 129 isolates (98%) were INH resistant. Only 2 (1.9%) RIF-resistant isolates were not MDR: one of these was RIF monoresistant and the other was resistant to RIF and streptomycin.

TABLE 2.

Resistance patterns in 131 consecutive isolates resistant to either isoniazid or rifampin identified at Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in southern Vietnam

Resistance patterna No. (%) of isolates
H 5 (3.8)
R 1 (0.8)
HE 2 (1.5)
HR 4 (3.0)
HS 19 (14.5)
RS 1 (0.8)
HRE 3 (2.3)
HRS 58 (44.3)
HSE 1 (0.8)
HRSE 37 (28.2)
Total 131 (100)
a

H, isoniazid; R, rifampin; S, streptomycin; E, ethambutol.

One hundred four RIF-resistant isolates had the rpoB RRDR sequenced. The most prevalent mutations were at codons 531 (43%), 526 (31%), and 516 (15%). In total, mutations were found in 11 different codons, 10 isolates had mutations at multiple codons, and two insertions in codons 514 and 521 were also identified. Mutations identified in rpoB in 104 rifampin-resistant isolates are shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3.

Mutations in the rpoB gene of 104 consecutive rifampin-resistant isolates identified in southern Vietnam

Mutated E. coli codon(s) M. tuberculosis mutation(s) Amino acid change(s) No. (%) of isolates
146 G508T V170F 1 (0.96)
511, 526 T1288C, C1333A L430P, H445N 1 (0.96)
511, 512 T1288C, A1290G L430P, S431G 1 (0.96)
511, 516 T1288C, A1304G L430P, D435G 1 (0.96)
513 C1293A Q432K 2 (1.92)
513 A1294T Q432L 1 (0.96)
513, 526 C1293A, C1333G Q432L, H445D 1 (0.96)
514 Insa: 1299TTC1300 Ins: F, QFM→QFFM 1 (0.96)
516 A1304T D435V 9 (8.65)
516 A1304C D435A 1 (0.96)
516, 526 A1304C, C1333A D435A, H445N 1 (0.96)
516, 526 A1304T, C1335G D435V, H445Q 1 (0.96)
516, 533 A1304G, T1355C D435G, L452P 2 (1.92)
521, 516 Ins: 1320TCGGGGTTG1333, A1304G Ins: SGL, PLSGL→PLSGLSGL, D435G 1 (0.96)
526 C1333T H445Y 14 (13.46)
526 C1333G H445D 6 (5.76)
526 A1334G H445R 5 (4.81)
526 C1333A, A1334G H445S 1 (0.96)
526 C1335G H445Q 1 (0.96)
526 A1334T H445L 1 (0.96)
526 C1333T, A1334T H445F 1 (0.96)
531 C1349T S450L 42 (40.38)
531, 561 C1349T, A1387G S450L, I480V 3 (2.88)
533 T1355C L452P 2 (1.92)
No mutations 4 (3.85)
a

Ins, insertion.

Five isolates showing no RRDR mutations had their N-terminal regions sequenced. One previously reported mutation, V146F, was found in the N-terminal region, and three isolates carried a mutation at codon 561, just outside cluster 2. These five isolates also had the cluster 3 region sequenced, but no further mutations were identified.

The first 100 isolates resistant to INH had katG sequenced. The majority of isolates, 71%, carried the G944C (S315T) mutation, while two isolates carried G944A (S315N) mutations, two carried G944T (S315I) mutations, and one carried a A943G (S315G) mutation. Two isolates carried double mutations: one G944C/C924T (S315T/T308T) and one a dual mutation in codon 315, G944C/C945G (S315T). One isolate appeared to have a deleted katG gene.

Twenty-one isolates with wild-type katG had their inhA and oxyR-ahpC region sequences determined. Ten isolates carried a −15C→T mutation in the inhA promoter, 1 isolate had a silent mutation in ahpC (C21A), 11 isolates carried a silent mutation in the oxyR pseudogene (G37A), and 6 isolates carried different mutations in the oxyR-ahpC intergenic region (−81C-T, −51G-A, −48G-A, −74G-A, −72C-T, and −51G-A).

DISCUSSION

These data indicate that rifampin resistance would be a good surrogate marker for MDR TB in this setting, with 98% of rifampin-resistant isolates also MDR. However, the molecular detection of rifampin resistance in Vietnam will be complex, with many single point mutations scattered in the RRDR, multiple mutations, and insertion events. The general pattern of rpoB mutations reflects those found worldwide, with codons 531 (43%), 526 (31%), and 516 (15%) being the most commonly mutated. Four isolates (4%) had no mutations in any region sequenced for rifampin resistance, as has been previously reported (11, 22). While it is possible that these isolates are due to laboratory error in the assignment of resistance, consistent reports from many laboratories suggest that another mechanism is responsible for resistance in these isolates. Alternatively, these isolates may contain a mixed population of resistant and susceptible organisms (8).

Two rare insertions were identified, 514F, reported elsewhere (10) and 521SGL. The V146F mutation, in the N-terminal (cluster 2) region, has also been reported elsewhere and associated with low-level resistance, though not exclusively so (9).

Seventy-one percent of INH-resistant isolates carried an S315T mutation in katG. This mutation has been associated with high-level (>5 μg/ml) INH resistance (31) but, again, not exclusively so (25, 31), with MICs ranging from 0.38 to 12 μg/ml. A further 7 (7%) isolates had different mutations in codon 315. In total, 78% of INH-resistant isolates carried a mutated KatG codon 315. One of these isolates carried a double mutation in codon 315 and one carried a second mutation at base 924. However, this mutation is synonymous, T308T, and therefore does not contribute to the resistant phenotype. Although S315T is the most common mutation worldwide, the precise functional effect of the mutation remains unclear. The threonine residue may block access to the active site and reduce the INH affinity of the enzyme, or it may alter redox potentials and local hydrogen bonds (2). The catalase peroxidase remains functional but with reduced activity (26, 33).

One isolate appears to have a deleted katG gene, a rare but previously reported event. Loss of katG confers high-level (>256 μg/ml) INH resistance but probably confers a biological cost for the bacteria in the form of a decreased ability to fight oxidative stress (34). Twenty-one isolates carried a wild-type katG gene. Ten of these (50%) had a −15C→T mutation in the inhA promoter. This mutation generally confers intermediate-level (0.1 to 0.4 μg/ml) resistance (18). Mutations in this promoter region lead to increased inhA expression, overwhelming the effect of INH at low levels. The INH reactive form, isonicotinic acyl radical, reacts with NAD(H) to form a covalent adduct which blocks the active site of the NADH-dependent enoyl ACP reductase product of inhA (27).

No mutations were found in ahpC which conferred resistance to INH. One isolate carried a C21A synonymous mutation. Ten isolates also carried the G37A polymorphism in oxyR, which is nonfunctional in M. tuberculosis, carrying multiple deletions and mutations (4); therefore, this mutation is unlikely to confer INH resistance.

Six isolates carried mutations in the oxyR-ahpC intergenic region, but the significance of this is unclear. Some mutations in this region, such as C−30T, have been shown to upregulate alkylhydroperoxidase (15), thought to be a compensatory mechanism for loss of catalase peroxidase activity; other mutations, such as −46G→A (1), have been found in both resistant and susceptible isolates and are not related to INH resistance but have phylogenetic significance. The functional effect, if any, of the mutations seen here is not yet known.

Recent reports (5) and theoretical models (6) suggest that MDR TB can be controlled and reduced through effective first-line DOTS programs such as the one functioning in Vietnam. The reasons for increasing drug resistance, particularly MDR, despite an effective NTP network remain unclear. However, both DOTS studies were based on lower underlying levels of primary drug resistance, and the use of a primary ethambutol-based continuation phase, as in Vietnam, has been shown to be less effective than rifampin-based regimens and may be a contributing factor (13). High rates of primary INH (20%) and streptomycin (31%) resistance and resistance to other first-line drugs (40% resistant to one or more) may well be a contributing factor, with many patients effectively receiving ethambutol monotherapy in the continuation phase.

A previous report suggests that 9% of smear-positive TB patients detected in the Vietnamese NTP in 2000 were not registered for treatment, suggesting that while detection rates were high, many of these patients did not progress through NTP-controlled DOTS (3). Efforts have been made to address this issue by changes in data management to record all patients at time of diagnosis, whereas prior to 2000, patients were only registered at commencement of therapy (12). Private treatment in Vietnam is associated with significantly lower treatment success rates than the NTP (48.9% versus 85%, P < 0.001) (20), probably due to incorrect prescriptions and poor adherence to therapy for financial and other reasons. It has been estimated that 40% of all antituberculosis drug dispensing in Vietnam occurs outside the NTP and that a quarter of these sales are made without a prescription (19).

It is likely that the prevalence figures on which WHO estimates of NTP performance are based (incidence of smear-positive TB, 85/100,000; prevalence, 96/100,000) (36) are also low. Wide regional variation in NTP performance, particularly in rural areas, may be hindering TB control in Vietnam. A prevalence survey in a rural district of Northwest Vietnam (30) estimated smear-positive prevalence at 90 to 110/100,000, but detection in the NTP is only 39% for females and 12% for males, significantly below the national detection rates. Efforts are being made by the government to improve NTP performance in rural areas.

Screening of applicants for Australian visas in Ho Chi Minh City by the IOM estimates rates of 157/100,000 for new smear-positive TB and 489/100,000 of new bacteriologically confirmed (smear and culture) TB, a rate 2.5 times that estimated by the WHO (23). The true incidence rates are unknown. TB notification rates vary widely across Vietnam, and it is also possible that the incentive system in the NTP leads to an overestimation of the cure rate (12). More accurate tuberculosis incidence and drug resistance prevalence data will be useful in addressing MDR TB in Vietnam.

It is likely that the sensitivity of hybridization tests for RIF resistance will be low in this setting. The commercial INNO-LiPA Rif.TB test (Innogenetics, Belgium) will directly detect only 73% through the resistant probes, though sensitivity may be higher when prediction of resistance through nonhybridization to probes for wild-type sequence is included. Probes directed to the 5 most prevalent mutations would achieve a sensitivity of only 78%. Molecular INH resistance detection may be simpler, though still incomplete, with combined detection of mutated codon 315 and −15C→T mutation in the inhA promoter, allowing a sensitivity of up to 89%. Early detection of INH resistance may be particularly important in Vietnam, with high underlying INH resistance (>20%) (16; also unpublished data) in conjunction with the use of an ethambutol-based continuation phase possibly fuelling the development of MDR TB. Ideally, such a test should be cheap, rapid, and applicable in low-technology environments to have an impact in Vietnam.

However, while the molecular detection of neither RIF nor INH resistance is 100% accurate and the importance of phenotypic tests for the exclusion of drug resistance remains, the earlier detection of resistant cases, particularly MDR TB, will be an important tool in controlling MDR TB and achieving the millennium development goals for reductions in TB mortality.

Acknowledgments

The Wellcome Trust of Great Britain funded the study.

We thank the staff of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases and Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases for assistance with culture and maintenance of isolates.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Baker, L. V., T. J. Brown, O. Maxwell, A. L. Gibson, Z. Fang, M. D. Yates, and F. A. Drobniewski. 2005. Molecular analysis of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from England and Wales reveals the phylogenetic significance of the ahpC −46A polymorphism. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1455-1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bertrand, T., N. A. Eady, J. N. Jones, Jesmin, J. M. Nagy, B. Jamart-Gregoire, E. L. Raven, and K. A. Brown. 2004. Crystal structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis catalase-peroxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 279:38991-38999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Buu, T. N., K. Lonnroth, and H. T. Quy. 2003. Initial defaulting in the National Tuberculosis Programme in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a survey of extent, reasons and alternative actions taken following default. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 7:735-741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Deretic, V., J. Song, and E. Pagan-Ramos. 1997. Loss of oxyR in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol. 5:367-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.DeRiemer, K., L. Garcia-Garcia, M. Bobadilla-del-Valle, M. Palacios-Martinez, A. Martinez-Gamboa, P. M. Small, J. Sifuentes-Osornio, and A. Ponce-de-Leon. 2005. Does DOTS work in populations with drug-resistant tuberculosis? Lancet 365:1239-1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dye, C., and M. A. Espinal. 2001. Will tuberculosis become resistant to all antibiotics? Proc. Biol. Sci. 268:45-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Espinal, M. A. 2003. Time to abandon the standard retreatment regimen with first-line drugs for failures of standard treatment. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 7:607-608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Heep, M., B. Brandstatter, U. Rieger, N. Lehn, E. Richter, S. Rusch-Gerdes, and S. Niemann. 2001. Frequency of rpoB mutations inside and outside the cluster I region in rifampin-resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:107-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heep, M., U. Rieger, D. Beck, and N. Lehn. 2000. Mutations in the beginning of the rpoB gene can induce resistance to rifamycins in both Helicobacter pylori and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1075-1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Herrera, L., S. Jimenez, A. Valverde, M. A. Garcia-Aranda, and J. A. Saez-Nieto. 2003. Molecular analysis of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated in Spain (1996-2001). Description of new mutations in the rpoB gene and review of the literature. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 21:403-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hirano, K., C. Abe, and M. Takahashi. 1999. Mutations in the rpoB gene of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated mostly in Asian countries and their rapid detection by line probe assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2663-2666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huong, N. T., B. D. Duong, N. V. Co, H. T. Quy, L. B. Tung, M. Bosman, A. Gebhardt, J. P. Velema, J. F. Broekmans, and M. W. Borgdorff. 2005. Establishment and development of the National Tuberculosis Control Programme in Vietnam. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 9:151-156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jindani, A., A. J. Nunn, and D. A. Enarson. 2004. Two 8-month regimens of chemotherapy for treatment of newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis: international multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 364:1244-1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kapur, V., L.-L. Li, S. Iordanescu, M. R. Hamrick, A. Wanger, B. N. Kreiswirth, and J. M. Musser. 1994. Characterization by automated DNA sequencing of mutations in the gene (rpoB) encoding the RNA polymerase beta subunit in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from New York City and Texas. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1095-1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kelley, C. L., D. A. Rouse, and S. L. Morris. 1997. Analysis of ahpC gene mutations in isoniazid-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2057-2058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khan, K., P. Muennig, M. Behta, and J. G. Zivin. 2002. Global drug-resistance patterns and the management of latent tuberculosis infection in immigrants to the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:1850-1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lan, N. T. N., M. F. Lademarco, N. J. Binkin, L. B. Tung, H. T. Quy, and N. V. Cj. 2001. A case series: initial outcome of persons with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis after treatment with the WHO standard retreatment regimen in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 5:575-578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lavender, C., M. Globan, A. Sievers, H. Billman-Jacobe, and J. Fyfe. 2005. Molecular characterization of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates collected in Australia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:4068-4074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lonnroth, K., K. Lambregts, D. T. Nhien, H. T. Quy, and V. K. Diwan. 2000. Private pharmacies and tuberculosis control: a survey of case detection skills and reported anti-tuberculosis drug dispensing in private pharmacies in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 4:1052-1059. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lonnroth, K., L. M. Thuong, K. Lambregts, H. T. Quy, and V. K. Diwan. 2003. Private tuberculosis care provision associated with poor treatment outcome: comparative study of a semi-private lung clinic and the NTP in two urban districts in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. National Tuberculosis Programme. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 7:165-171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marttila, H. J., H. Soini, P. Huovinen, and M. K. Viljanen. 1996. katG mutations in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates recovered from Finnish patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2187-2189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mokrousov, I., N. V. Bhanu, P. N. Suffys, G. V. Kadival, S. F. Yap, S. N. Cho, A. M. Jordaan, O. Narvskaya, U. B. Singh, H. M. Gomes, H. Lee, S. P. Kulkarni, K. C. Lim, B. K. Khan, D. van Soolingen, T. C. Victor, and L. M. Schouls. 2004. Multicenter evaluation of reverse line blot assay for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. J. Microbiol. Methods 57:323-335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Plant, A. J., R. E. Watkins, N. Motus, W. Jones, T. O'Rourke, J. Streeton, and B. Gushulak. 2005. Results of tuberculosis screening in applicants for migration in Vietnam and Cambodia. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 9:157-163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Quy, H. T., N. T. Lan, M. W. Borgdorff, J. Grosset, P. D. Linh, L. B. Tung, D. van Soolingen, M. Raviglione, N. V. Co, and J. Broekmans. 2003. Drug resistance among failure and relapse cases of tuberculosis: is the standard re-treatment regimen adequate? Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 7:631-636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ramaswamy, S. V., R. Reich, S. J. Dou, L. Jasperse, X. Pan, A. Wanger, T. Quitugua, and E. A. Graviss. 2003. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1241-1250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rouse, D. A., J. A. DeVito, Z. Li, H. Byer, and S. L. Morris. 1996. Site-directed mutagenesis of the katG gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: effects on catalase-peroxidase activities and isoniazid resistance. Mol. Microbiol. 22:583-592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rozwarski, D. A., G. A. Grant, D. H. Barton, W. R. Jacobs, Jr., and J. C. Sacchettini. 1998. Modification of the NADH of the isoniazid target (InhA) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 279:98-102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Silva, M. S. N., S. G. Senna, M. O. Ribeiro, A. R. M. Valim, M. A. Telles, A. Kritski, G. P. Morlock, R. C. Cooksey, A. Zaha, and M. L. R. Rossetti. 2003. Mutations in katG, inhA, and ahpC genes of Brazilian isoniazid-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4471-4474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Telenti, A., N. Honore, C. Bernasconi, J. March, A. Ortega, B. Heym, H. Takiff, and S. Cole. 1997. Genotypic assessment of isoniazid and rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind study at reference laboratory level. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:719-723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thorson, A., N. P. Hoa, N. H. Long, P. Allebeck, and V. K. Diwan. 2004. Do women with tuberculosis have a lower likelihood of getting diagnosed? Prevalence and case detection of sputum smear positive pulmonary TB, a population-based study from Vietnam. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 57:398-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.van Soolingen, D., P. E. de Haas, H. R. van Doorn, E. Kuijper, H. Rinder, and M. W. Borgdorff. 2000. Mutations at amino acid position 315 of the katG gene are associated with high-level resistance to isoniazid, other drug resistance, and successful transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the Netherlands. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1788-1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ward, H. A., D. D. Marciniuk, V. H. Hoeppner, and W. Jones. 2005. Treatment outcome of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among Vietnamese immigrants. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 9:164-169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wengenack, N. L., J. R. Uhl, A. L. St Amand, A. J. Tomlinson, L. M. Benson, S. Naylor, B. C. Kline, F. R. Cockerill III, and F. Rusnak. 1997. Recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis KatG(S315T) is a competent catalase-peroxidase with reduced activity toward isoniazid. J. Infect. Dis. 176:722-727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wilson, T. M., G. W. de Lisle, and D. M. Collins. 1995. Effect of inhA and katG on isoniazid resistance and virulence of Mycobacterium bovis. Mol. Microbiol. 15:1009-1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.World Health Organization. 1997. Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world: the WHO/IUATLD global project on drug resistance surveillance, 1994-1997. WHO/tb/97.229. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 36.World Health Organization. 2002. Global TB control: surveillance, planning, financing, 2002. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES