Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1986 Apr 15;134(8):889–895.

Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials.

G H Guyatt, C Bombardier, P X Tugwell
PMCID: PMC1490966  PMID: 3955482

Abstract

While measurement of quality of life is a vital part of assessing the effect of treatment in many clinical trials, a measure that is responsive to clinically important change is often unavailable. Investigators are therefore faced with the challenge of constructing an index for a specific condition or even for a single trial. There are several stages in the development and testing of a quality-of-life measure: selecting an initial item pool, choosing the "best" items from that pool, deciding on questionnaire format, pretesting the instrument, and demonstrating the responsiveness and validity of the instrument. At each stage the investigator must choose between a rigorous, time-consuming approach to questionnaire construction that will establish the clinical relevance, responsiveness and validity of the instrument and a more efficient, less costly strategy that leaves reproducibility, responsiveness and validity untested. This article describes these options and outlines a pragmatic approach that yields consistently satisfactory disease-specific measures of quality of life.

Full text

PDF
889

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexander M. R., Dull W. L., Kasik J. E. Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with orally administered theophylline. A double-blind, controlled study. JAMA. 1980 Nov 21;244(20):2286–2290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Carter W. B., Gilson B. S. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):787–805. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bombardier C., Tugwell P. A methodological framework to develop and select indices for clinical trials: statistical and judgmental approaches. J Rheumatol. 1982 Sep-Oct;9(5):753–757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deyo R. A. Measuring functional outcomes in therapeutic trials for chronic disease. Control Clin Trials. 1984 Sep;5(3):223–240. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(84)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Downie W. W., Leatham P. A., Rhind V. M., Wright V., Branco J. A., Anderson J. A. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Aug;37(4):378–381. doi: 10.1136/ard.37.4.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eaton M. L., MacDonald F. M., Church T. R., Niewoehner D. E. Effects of theophylline on breathlessness and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. Chest. 1982 Nov;82(5):538–542. doi: 10.1378/chest.82.5.538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fries J. F., Spitz P. W., Young D. Y. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol. 1982 Sep-Oct;9(5):789–793. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldman L., Hashimoto B., Cook E. F., Loscalzo A. Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation. 1981 Dec;64(6):1227–1234. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.6.1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guyatt G. H., Berman L. B., Townsend M., Taylor D. W. Should study subjects see their previous responses? J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(12):1003–1007. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90098-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunt S. M., McKenna S. P., McEwen J., Backett E. M., Williams J., Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Dec;34(4):281–286. doi: 10.1136/jech.34.4.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huskisson E. C. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127–1131. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaplan R. M., Bush J. W., Berry C. C. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res. 1976 Winter;11(4):478–507. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kirshner B., Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27–36. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kramer M. S., Feinstein A. R. Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Jan;29(1):111–123. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mor V., Laliberte L., Morris J. N., Wiemann M. The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting. Cancer. 1984 May 1;53(9):2002–2007. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840501)53:9<2002::aid-cncr2820530933>3.0.co;2-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Priestman T. J., Baum M. Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer. Lancet. 1976 Apr 24;1(7965):899–900. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92112-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scott J., Huskisson E. C. Accuracy of subjective measurements made with or without previous scores: an important source of error in serial measurement of subjective states. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979 Dec;38(6):558–559. doi: 10.1136/ard.38.6.558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Scott P. J., Huskisson E. C. Measurement of functional capacity with visual analogue scales. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977 Nov;16(4):257–259. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/16.4.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Spitzer W. O., Dobson A. J., Hall J., Chesterman E., Levi J., Shepherd R., Battista R. N., Catchlove B. R. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34(12):585–597. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(81)90058-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES