Abstract
Although the midclavicular line (MCL) is the usual reference point for clinical assessment of liver size and localization of the cardiac apex beat, we found substantial interobserver variation in locating the MCL. The distance from the midline to the MCL as estimated by 20 clinicians in three subjects varied by up to 10 cm. More variation was found for estimates in the obese subject than for those in the two subjects of normal build (p = 0.004). No difference in variation was found between consultants and house staff. The limitations of the MCL as a reference point are discussed in light of these findings.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Blendis L. M., McNeilly W. J., Sheppard L., Williams R., Laws J. W. Observer variation in the clinical and radiological assessment of hepatosplenomegaly. Br Med J. 1970 Mar 21;1(5698):727–730. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5698.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castell D. O., O'Brien K. D., Muench H., Chalmers T. C. Eastimation of liver size by percussion in normal individuals. Ann Intern Med. 1969 Jun;70(6):1183–1189. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-70-6-1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malchow-Møller A., Rasmussen S. N., Jensen A. M., Keiding N., Skovgaard L. T., Juhl E. Clinical estimation of liver size. Dan Med Bull. 1984 Feb;31(1):63–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peternel W. W., Schaefer J. W., Schiff L. Clinical evaluation of liver size and hepatic scintiscan. Am J Dig Dis. 1966 May;11(5):346–350. doi: 10.1007/BF02233628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rytand D. A. The midclavicular line: where is it? Ann Intern Med. 1968 Aug;69(2):329–330. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-69-2-329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sapira J. D., Williamson D. L. How big is the normal liver? Arch Intern Med. 1979 Sep;139(9):971–973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan S., Krasner N., Williams R. The clinical estimation of liver size: a comparison of techniques and an analysis of the source of error. Br Med J. 1976 Oct 30;2(6043):1042–1043. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6043.1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]