Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of recommendations to reduce the cesarean section rate issued by the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth in 1986 on obstetric practices and to identify current patient factors that predict cesarean section. DESIGN: Descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: A tertiary care perinatal referral centre and a general teaching hospital with a level 2 nursery in Hamilton, Ont. PATIENTS: All patients who gave birth at the two hospitals in 1982 (4121 women) and 1990 (4431). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cesarean section rates and indications and predictors of cesarean section. RESULTS: Although a trial of vaginal delivery after cesarean section was offered 93% more often in 1990 than in 1982 (p = 0.0002), the rate of vaginal delivery increased only 2.6%, for a reduction of 8.7% in the total cesarean section rate and of 15% in the repeat cesarean section rate. The incidence rate and treatment of dystocia did not change. The rate of cesarean section for breech presentation remained unchanged, and fetal distress was rarely confirmed with pH measurement in scalp blood before cesarean section. The most important predictors of cesarean section in 1990 were previous cesarean section and labour induction. For the nulliparous women and the multiparous women with no previous cesarean section labour induction was the most important predictor. CONCLUSIONS: The rate at which patients with previous cesarean section are offered a trial of vaginal delivery has increased significantly since 1982; however, the total and repeat cesarean section rates have not decreased proportionally. Induction of labour is currently the most important correctable predictor of cesarean section. The active management of dystocia, efforts to increase the rate of vaginal breech delivery and appropriate methods to diagnose fetal distress need to be improved; such improvements should reduce the cesarean section rate further.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson G. M., Lomas J. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982. N Engl J Med. 1984 Oct 4;311(14):887–892. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198410043111405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson G. M., Lomas J. Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontario. CMAJ. 1989 Nov 15;141(10):1049–1053. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banta H. D., Thacker S. B. Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1979 Aug;34(8):627–642. doi: 10.1097/00006254-197908000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bottoms S. F., Rosen M. G., Sokol R. J. The increase in the cesarean birth rate. N Engl J Med. 1980 Mar 6;302(10):559–563. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198003063021006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myers S. A., Gleicher N. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates. N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 8;319(23):1511–1516. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812083192304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nair C. Trends in cesarean section deliveries in Canada. Health Rep. 1991;3(3):203–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders L. D., Flowerdew G. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988. CMAJ. 1991 May 15;144(10):1243-9, 1252. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stafford R. S. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section. JAMA. 1991 Jan 2;265(1):59–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taffel S. M., Placek P. J., Liss T. Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise. Am J Public Health. 1987 Aug;77(8):955–959. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.8.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wadhera S., Nair C. Trends in cesarean section deliveries, Canada, 1968-1977. Can J Public Health. 1982 Jan-Feb;73(1):47–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]