Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1987 May 15;136(10):1045–1049.

Changes in the management of labour: 2. Perineal management.

J L Reynolds, P L Yudkin
PMCID: PMC1492550  PMID: 3567764

Abstract

An analysis of 24,439 deliveries between 1980 and 1984 in a large British obstetric unit showed a striking decline in the rate of episiotomy. The rates of first- and second-degree perineal tears increased during the study period, but overall there was a significant rise in the proportion of women who gave birth with an intact perineum (p less than 0.001). There was no increase in the rate of third-degree tears or of other perineal complications. Delivery with an intact perineum was more likely among younger women, those with a short second stage of labour and those with a small baby (p less than 0.001). These findings confirm the short-term safety of lowering episiotomy rates and should be helpful to all obstetric professionals in reducing unnecessary perineal morbidity among childbearing women.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Banta H. D., Thacker S. B. Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1979 Aug;34(8):627–642. doi: 10.1097/00006254-197908000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchan P. C., Nicholls J. A. Pain after episiotomy--a comparison of two methods of repair. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 May;30(214):297–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buekens P., Lagasse R., Dramaix M., Wollast E. Episiotomy and third-degree tears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Aug;92(8):820–823. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb03052.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chalmers I. Commentaries: British debate on obstetric practice. Pediatrics. 1976 Sep;58(3):308–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon H., Logue M. Perineal muscle function after childbirth. Lancet. 1985 Jul 20;2(8447):123–125. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90227-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harrison R. F., Brennan M., North P. M., Reed J. V., Wickham E. A. Is routine episiotomy necessary? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Jun 30;288(6435):1971–1975. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6435.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jackson M. B., Dunster G. D. Episiotomy: who gets one and why. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Nov;34(268):603–605. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Light H. K., Solheim J. S., Hunter G. W. Satisfaction with medical care during pregnancy and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Jul 15;125(6):827–831. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90858-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Reading A. E., Sledmere C. M., Cox D. N., Campbell S. How women view postepisiotomy pain. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Jan 23;284(6311):243–246. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6311.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sleep J., Grant A., Garcia J., Elbourne D., Spencer J., Chalmers I. West Berkshire perineal management trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 8;289(6445):587–590. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6445.587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Snooks S. J., Setchell M., Swash M., Henry M. M. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet. 1984 Sep 8;2(8402):546–550. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90766-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Thacker S. B., Banta H. D. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983 Jun;38(6):322–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES