Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1987 Apr;205(4):340–348. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198704000-00002

Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in the evaluation of soft tissue tumors of the extremities.

A E Chang, Y L Matory, A J Dwyer, S C Hill, M E Girton, S M Steinberg, R H Knop, J A Frank, D Hyams, J L Doppman, et al.
PMCID: PMC1492735  PMID: 3032120

Abstract

Twenty patients with extremity soft tissue tumors were prospectively evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans with subsequent anatomic correlation of surgical findings. MRI and CT had a similar percentage of accuracy in assessing tumor relationship with major neurovascular (80% and 70%, respectively) and skeletal (80% and 75%, respectively) structures. MRI was significantly better than CT in displaying contrast between tumor and muscle when using the T2 weighted spin echo (SE) (p2 less than 0.002) and inversion recovery (IR) (p2 less than 0.005) pulse sequences. MRI and CT were comparable in demonstrating contrast between tumor and fat. The contrast between tumor and vessel was better displayed by MRI compared with CT when using the T1 weighted SE (p2 less than 0.001) and T2 weighted SE (p2 less than 0.001) pulse sequences. T1 and T2 values were measured on fresh tumor and normal tissue samples and were used to predict relative contrast on different MRI pulse sequences using isosignal contour plots. MRI appears to offer several advantages over CT in the evaluation of extremity soft tissue tumors.

Full text

PDF
340

Images in this article

343Figs. 1A-F.
on p.343
344Figs. 2A-C.
on p.344

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brady T. J., Rosen B. R., Pykett I. L., McGuire M. H., Mankin H. J., Rosenthal D. I. NMR imaging of leg tumors. Radiology. 1983 Oct;149(1):181–187. doi: 10.1148/radiology.149.1.6577518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron I. L., Ord V. A., Fullerton G. D. Characterization of proton NMR relaxation times in normal and pathological tissues by correlation with other tissue parameters. Magn Reson Imaging. 1984;2(2):97–106. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(84)90063-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Costa J., Wesley R. A., Glatstein E., Rosenberg S. A. The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinicohistopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases. Cancer. 1984 Feb 1;53(3):530–541. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3<530::aid-cncr2820530327>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Damadian R. Tumor detection by nuclear magnetic resonance. Science. 1971 Mar 19;171(3976):1151–1153. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3976.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Damadian R., Zaner K., Hor D., DiMaio T. Human tumors detected by nuclear magnetic resonance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1471–1473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eggleston J. C., Saryan L. A., Hollis D. P. Nuclear magnetic resonance investigations of human neoplastic and abnormal nonneoplastic tissues. Cancer Res. 1975 May;35(5):1326–1332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hollis D. P., Economou J. S., Parks L. C., Eggleston J. C., Saryan L. A., Czeister J. L. Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of several experimental and human malignant tumors. Cancer Res. 1973 Sep;33(9):2156–2160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hudson T. M., Hamlin D. J., Enneking W. F., Pettersson H. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors: early experience in 31 patients compared with computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol. 1985;13(2):134–146. doi: 10.1007/BF00352084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kurtz D., Dwyer A. Isosignal contours and signal gradients as an aid to choosing MR imaging techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984 Oct;8(5):819–828. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198410000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moon K. L., Jr, Genant H. K., Helms C. A., Chafetz N. I., Crooks L. E., Kaufman L. Musculoskeletal applications of nuclear magnetic resonance. Radiology. 1983 Apr;147(1):161–171. doi: 10.1148/radiology.147.1.6828722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Petasnick J. P., Turner D. A., Charters J. R., Gitelis S., Zacharias C. E. Soft-tissue masses of the locomotor system: comparison of MR imaging with CT. Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):125–133. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3715023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pettersson H., Hamlin D. J., Mancuso A., Scott K. N. Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1985 May-Jun;26(3):225–234. doi: 10.1177/028418518502600301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Richardson M. L., Amparo E. G., Gillespy T., 3rd, Helms C. A., Demas B. E., Genant H. K. Theoretical considerations for optimizing intensity differences between primary musculoskeletal tumors and normal tissue with spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 1985 Aug;20(5):492–497. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198508000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenthal D. I., Scott J. A., Brady T. J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the extremities. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1986;8(5-6):377–381. doi: 10.1007/BF02552374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scott J. A., Rosenthal D. I., Brady T. J. The evaluation of musculoskeletal disease with magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 1984 Dec;22(4):917–924. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Totty W. G., Murphy W. A., Lee J. K. Soft-tissue tumors: MR imaging. Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):135–141. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3715024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES